Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Elaine S. Byrne”
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-24-00498-CV David Lynn Johnson, Appellant v. Matthew David Skaggs and Cheyenne Elaine Skaggs, Appellees FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF SAN SABA COUNTY NO. 10,244, THE HONORABLE EVAN C. STUBBS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Alim v. Byrnepublic domain
521 F.Supp. 1039 (1980) Malik Abdul ALIM, Plaintiff, v. Brendan T. BYRNE, et al., Defendants. Malik Abdul ALIM, Plaintiff, v. Brendan T. BYRNE, Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 76-0499, 76-1661. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. July 8, 1980. Richard A. Levao, Shanley & Fisher, Newark, N. J., for plaintiffs. Elaine W. Ballai, Deputy Atty. Ge
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00820-CV St. David’s Healthcare Partnership, LP; St. David’s Healthcare Partnership, LP, LLP; Round Rock Hospital, Inc.; St. David’s Healthcare System, Inc.; St. David’s Partnership, LP, LLP; and St. David’s Medical Center, Appellants v. Kristi Elaine Fuller f/k/a Kristi Elaine Baezetero, Appellee
Kevin Marilley v. Charlton Bonhampublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KEVIN MARILLEY; SALVATORE No. 13-17358 PAPETTI; SAVIOR PAPETTI, on behalf of themselves and D.C. No. similarly situated, 4:11-cv-02418-DMR Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OPINION CHARLTON H. BONHAM, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Fish and Game, Defendant-Ap
Kevin Marilley v. Charlton Bonhampublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KEVIN MARILLEY; SALVATORE No. 13-17358 PAPETTI; SAVIOR PAPETTI, individually and on behalf of all D.C. No. others similarly situated, 4:11-cv-02418- Plaintiffs-Appellees, DMR v. OPINION CHARLTON H. BONHAM, in his official capacity as
In Re Dickinsonpublic domain
185 B.R. 76 (1995) In re Elaine Margaret DICKINSON, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 95-11160 RJB. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. August 14, 1995. *77 Barton S. Balis, Boulder, CO, for debtor. Helen R. Stone, Stone, Sheehy, Rosen & Byrne, P.C., Boulder, CO, for Jerry Dickinson. John T. Sullivan, Boulder, CO, pro se.
Byrne v. Statepublic domain
OPINION BRETT, Judge: The crux of this decision turns on this Court’s interpretation of the latitude granted the prosecutor both in conducting cross-examination and delivering closing argument. The alleged misconduct occurred in both stages of this bifurcated trial. Appellant, James Clinton Byrne, was convicted of Knowingly Concealing Stolen Property, After Former Conviction of a F
Allco Fin. Ltd. v. Robert J. Kleepublic domain
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Allco Finance Limited (“Allco” or “Plaintiff’) appeals from a final judgment entered by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Haight, /.), which dismissed two of Allco’s related, but not formally consolidated, Complaints (“the Complaints”). The Complaints focus
Lundberg Stratton, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. {¶ 25} I concur in the clarification of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 95 Ohio St.3d 512, 2002-Ohio-2842, 769 N.E.2d 835, in this case. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s legal conclusion that the appellants were
United States v. Manuel Larry Jacksonpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Manuel Larry Jackson appeals his 210-month sentence imposed following his jury conviction for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (1988). Jackson contends the district court erred by enhancing his sentence under the career offender provision of United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 4B1.1 (1990) because a prior California conviction for
Kennedy v. Dermatology Associates of Knoxville, P.C.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MURRIAN, United States Magistrate Judge. The plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel and Notice to Defendants and Tennessee Psychiatry and Psychopharmacology Clinic, P.C. has been referred to the undersigned pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and the Rules of this Court [Docs. 82, 84]. A response has been filed by the Tennessee' Psychiatry and Psy-chopharmacology Clinic, P.C. (“TPP Clinic
Ainsworth v. First Bank of South Dakotapublic domain
Lincoln and Elaine Ainsworth appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for all defendants. Ainsworths argue that the trial court erred in the admission of hearsay testimony and in instructing the jury. We affirm. FACTS This controversy centers around Larry Byrne's attempt to develop a commercial coal-pelleting process, which he sought to patent. Byrne was financed by First Bank of South Dakota (Bank) and one of its officers, Bruce Walker.
Trax International Corporation v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims BID PROTEST No. 19-685C (Filed Under Seal: August 12, 2019 | Reissued: August 27, 2019)* ) Keywords: Standing; Prejudice; Pre- TRAX INTERNATIONAL ) Award Protest; FAR 15.206(a); CORPORATION, ) Procurement Integrity Act;
Dremak v. Iovate Health Sciences Group, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 9(b), defendants Iovate Health Sciences, Inc. and Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc., (“Manufacturer Defendants” or “Iovate”) and GNC Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walgreens Company, CV
Arabaitzis v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am.public domain
TREVOR N. McFADDEN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Elaine Arabaitzis seeks to recover benefits under the Employee Retirement Insurance Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. The Court granted summary judgment for Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America, the claims administrator
Winkler v. Halmar Intl., LLCpublic domain
Winkler v Halmar Intl., LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 03984) Winkler v Halmar Intl., LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 03984 Decided on June 16, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
Winkler v. Halmar Intl., LLCpublic domain
Winkler v Halmar Intl., LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 03984) Winkler v Halmar Intl., LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 03984 Decided on June 16, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
Duca v. Raymark Industriespublic domain
663 F.Supp. 184 (1986) Joseph J. DUCA, Sr. and Elaine Duca v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, et al. Civ. A. No. 84-0587. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. September 12, 1986. *185 Norman Perlberger, Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley, Philadelphia, Pa., Mitchell S. Cohen, Thomas E. Kopil, for plaintiffs. Arthur Makado
Dennehy v. Robertspublic domain
798 P.2d 663 (1990) 310 Or. 394 Thomas P. DENNEHY and Martin L. Buchanan, Respondents, v. Barbara ROBERTS, Secretary of State, Anthony Meeker, Fred D. Miller and Richard A. Munn, and Dick Sohrt, Appellants, and Mark Nelson, Gregory Kafoury, Elaine Kelley and Lloyd K. Marbet, Intervenor-Appellants. Lon T. Mabon, Respondent, v. Barbara Roberts, Secretary of State, Anthony Meeker, Fred D. Miller and Richard A. Mun
Ainsworth v. First Bank of South Dakotapublic domain
MILLER, Justice (on reassignment). This is an appeal from the dismissal of a party on the grounds of failure to assert a compulsory counterclaim in a prior action. We reverse. FACTS ' Appellant Lincoln Ainsworth (Ainsworth) and his wife Elaine, commenced this action seeking damages against First Bank of South Dakota (Bank), Bruce Walker (Walker) an officer of Bank, and Larr