⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “El v. U.S. Department of State”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017-02-27 · Published · cited 0× · 678 F. App'x 99
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Aubrey J. El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action related to termination of his federal employment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. El v. U.S. Dep’t of Commerce, No. 2:15-cv-00532-RGD-DEM (E.D. Va. July 19, 2016).
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-05-08 · Published · cited 3× · 786 F.3d 688; 45 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20088; 80 ERC (BNA) 1457; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7631
OPINION SCHROEDER, Senior Circuit Judge: We deal with another phase of California’s efforts to create a “Pesticide Element” for its State Implementation Plan (“SIP”) that meets the requirements of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. This is a challenge by several community organizations to the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2010-09-23 · Published · cited 1× · 759 F. Supp. 2d 867; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139143; 2010 WL 5542028
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, District Judge. On this day, the Court considered Defendants U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs; Joan Ricard, Director, El Paso VA Medical Center; and Dr. Loren Wilkenfeld, Chief of Mental Health’s (Defendants) “Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-01-15 · Published · cited 59× · 351 F. Supp. 3d 502
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: *513TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND A. History and Purposes of the Census...519 B. The Secretary's Authority Over the Census...521 C. The History of a Citizenship Question on the Census...524 D. Test
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019-03-01 · Published · cited 3× · 916 F.3d 1068
Silberman, Senior Circuit Judge: A number of applicants sought Stafford Act economic relief from FEMA because of storm damage. They, accompanied by La Union del Pueblo Entero, appeal the district court's dismissal. We, however, agree with the district court. We lack jurisdiction over their claims because of a statutory preclusion of judicial review. I.
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-10-26 · Published · cited 9× · 345 F. Supp. 3d 444
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: *446In these consolidated cases, Plaintiffs bring claims under the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment challenging the decision of Secretary of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. to reinstate a question concerning citizenship status on the 2020 census qu
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-12-13 · Published · cited 19× · 843 F.3d 886; 46 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20197; 83 ERC (BNA) 1797; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 22084; 2016 WL 7210054
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, a group of entities and individuals that own businesses or real property located on Central Avenue in Albuquerque, New Mexico, filed this action seeking to enjoin the City of Albuquerque (the City) from proceeding with construction of a rapid transit bus system along Central Avenue. Plaintiffs claim, in pertinent part, that the City and the Fede
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018-06-15 · Published · cited 28× · 892 F.3d 1340
Dyk, Circuit Judge. *1342 Silfab Solar Inc., Heliene Inc., Canadian Solar (USA) Inc., and Canadian Solar Solutions Inc. ("appellants") sought a preliminary injunction to bar the enforcement of presidentially imposed tariffs on solar products. The Court of International Trade ("CIT") den
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-05-19 · Published · cited 31× · 767 F.3d 781; 2014 WL 3766720
ORDER The opinion filed May 19, 2014, and published at 751 F.3d 1113, is amended as follows: At slip opinion page 32, in the fourth and fifth textual sentences in the second full paragraph, Change: “Imperial Irrigation, Imperial County, and the State of California, not the Secretary, will ultimately determine how to allocate the water they receive. If they so choose, they could allocate every acre
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-05-19 · Published · cited 1× · 751 F.3d 1113; 2014 WL 2038234
OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge: The Saltón Sea — the largest inland body of water in California — is a creature of accident. In 1905, water from the Colorado River breached an irrigation canal and flooded the then-dry Saltón Basin. After the initial flood, irrigation runoff from the Imperial and Coachella Valleys — supplied by the Colorado River — sus
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-12-14 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KRISTEN H. COLINDRES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 21-cv-348 (GMH) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are a long-married couple with a young daughter who lived together in th
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-02-24 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) NICK TURSE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 22-cv-2970 (APM)
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2018-10-31 · Published · cited 1× · 354 F. Supp. 3d 722
FRANK MONTALVO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case results from an appeal of an arbitration decision following an arbitration proceeding convened to address the applicability of the Randolph-Sheppard Act to a contract for supporting cafeteria services at Fort Bliss. Before the court are "Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Partial Motion for Summary Judgment, and Partial Motion to Remand Plaintiff's Ame
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2014-10-16 · Published · cited 15× · 60 F. Supp. 3d 1156; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164782; 2014 WL 6476125
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JUDITH C. HERRERA, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner M.S.P.C.’s Emergency Motion for Stay of Removal (ECF No. 2). The Court held a telephonic hearing on the motion on September 4, 2014, and ordered supplemental briefing. The Court, having considered the motion, briefs, arguments of the parties, applicable law, and otherwise being ful
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-06-09 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) PRINCESS-CAT EL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 16-cv-1886 (KBJ) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ) AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., ) ) Defendants.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-04-23 · Published · cited 0× · 566 U.S. 964; 132 S. Ct. 1972; 182 L. Ed. 2d 822; 80 U.S.L.W. 3595; 2012 WL 568277; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 3233
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-08-12 · Published · cited 6× · 762 F.3d 971
OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: Avenal Power Center LLC (“Avenal Power”) applied to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) for a Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit (“Permit”), to build and operate the Avenal Energy Project, a 600 megawatt natural gas-fired power plant in the city of Avenal, California. Although EPA had a sta
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-05-08 · Published · cited 95× · 890 F.3d 164
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: We withdraw our prior opinion of March 13, 2018, City of El Cenizo v. Texas , 885 F.3d 332 (5th Cir. 2018), and substitute the following, the purpose of which is to eliminate reference to United States v
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-07-03 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HERITAGE FOUNDATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 23-cv-1854 (DLF) DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this case, the Heritage Foundation and Mike Howell (together, “Heritage”) seek records from the U.S. Department of Justice relat
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-09-19 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JASON LEOPOLD and BUZZFEED, INC., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 19-3192 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 34, 38 : UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF : JUSTICE,