Cases

Filed 10/30/19 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (El Dorado) ---- COUNTY OF EL DORADO et al., C088409 Petitioners, (Super. Ct. No.

Filed 11/26/19 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (El Dorado) ---- COUNTY OF EL DORADO et al., C088409 Petitioners, (Super. Ct. No.

KELLY, Circuit Judge. El Dorado Chemical Company (EDCC) operates a chemical manufacturing plant in El Dorado, Arkansas. As a byproduct of its operation, the plant discharges dissolved minerals, including sulfate and chloride, into two unnamed tributaries (UTA and UTB); these tributaries reach downstream to Flat Creek and Haynes Creek. In 2004, Arkansas imposed more stringent lim

ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. (ECF No’s 21 & 40). Both parties ask the Court to grant judgment as matter of law upon review of an administrative decision by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). Each party has responded to the other’s motion, and each has filed a reply. (ECF No’s 38, 42, 46,

283 S.W.3d 191 (2008) INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, A New Jersey Corporation, DR Holding Corporation, and Glen Whitworth, Appellants, v. EL DORADO CHEMICAL COMPANY, An Oklahoma Corporation, Appellee. No. 07-606. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 17, 2008. *192 Friday, Eldredge & Clark, LLP, by: Donald H. Bacon and Robert S. Shafer,

Opinion WERDEGAR, J. Does the Director of the Department of Conservation (Director) have standing to file a petition for a writ of mandate challenging reclamation plans and financial assurances for surface mining operations approved by defendant El Dorado County (County) under the Surface Mining *981and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA) (Pub. Resources

245 Kan. 250 (1989) 777 P.2d 821 WILDA FRANCES YOUNG CONNER, Appellant, v. KOCH OIL COMPANY, a division of KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC.; DARREL PATTESON; FRANK PATTESON; and PATTESON BROTHERS, INC., Appellees. No. 62,658 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed July 14, 1989. Robert Hall, of Wichita, argued the cause and John W. Wall, of

429 So.2d 561 (1983) ODELL VINSON OIL FIELD CONTRACTORS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EL DORADO GAS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 82-608. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 29, 1983. Showers & Guidry, Randall L. Guidry, Lafayette, for defendant-appellant. Robert W. Levy, Ruston, for plaintiff-appellee. Before STOKER, DOUCET and YELVER

133 Cal.Rptr.2d 780 (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 672 The PEOPLE EX REL. DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. EL DORADO COUNTY et al., Defendants and Respondents, Loring Brunius, Real Party in Interest and Respondent, California Mining Association et al., Interveners and Respondents. No. C039428. Court of Appeal, Third District.

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. This is an interlocutory appeal brought by Deltic Farm and Timber Company (“Deltic”), seeking review of a partial summary judgment rendered below in favor of Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (“Great Lakes”). This ease, in which Deltic alleges that Great Lakes wrongfully removed minerals from its property, is here under our

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1140 ___________________________ Murphy Oil Corporation Plaintiff Appellant v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company Defendan

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI-ESPECIAL PEERLESS OIL & Certiorari CHEMICALS, INC. procedente del Tribunal de Recurrida Primera Instancia, S

TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Currently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by *793Plaintiff Murphy Oil Corporation ("Murphy") and Defendant Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company ("Liberty").1 For the reasons given below, Murphy's motion is DENIED, Liberty

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 11, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-00289-CV SHELL TRADING (US) COMPANY, Appellant V. LION OIL TRADING & TRANSPORTATION, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas

225 Cal.App.3d 872 (1990) 274 Cal. Rptr. 720 ORO FINO GOLD MINING CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF EL DORADO et al., Defendants and Respondents; MOTHERLODE ALLIANCE, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Docket No. C007190. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. November 5, 1990. *875<

(2008) SUNGARD ENERGY SYSTEMS INC., Complainant, v. GAS TRANSMISSION NORTHWEST CORP., Respondent. Civil Action No. H-07-2205. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 29, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIM LAKE, District Judge. Pending before the court is complainant SunGard Energy System Inc.'s ("Sun-Ga

The opinion of the court was delivered by Fontron, J.: This action is brought to recover damages for breach of a contract to drill an oil well. Essential facts are not in dispute. On August 16, '1971, the Union Gas System, Inc., and Field C. Benton, hereafter collectively referred to as Union Gas, oifaned oil and gas leases known as the Glasscock leases which covered two quarter sections of 'land in Elk County.

ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice. | Appellants Carroll W. Smith and Lorene R. Smith appeal from a White County Circuit Court order finding that Appellee Arkansas Midstream Gas Services Corporation (Midstream) had the authority to exercise the power of eminent domain over the Smiths’ land in order to construct and maintain a natural gas pipeline. The Smiths present several issues on appeal. We affirm the order

ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice. liAppellants Perry L. Linder and Kathy A. Linder appeal from a Cleburne County Circuit Court order finding that appellee Arkansas Midstream Gas Services Corporation (Midstream) had the authority to exercise the power of eminent domain over appellants’ land to construct and maintain a natural gas pipeline. Authority for the circuit judge’s order was Arkansas Code A

196 B.R. 818 (1996) In re L.D. McMULLAN and Nila McMullan, Debtors. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE OF EL DORADO, Plaintiff, v. L.D. McMULLAN and Nila Owens McMullan, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 94-11228M. Adv. No. 94-1516. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas, El Dorado Division. April 18, 1996. *819