Cases

POEEBNBARGER, PRESIDENT: On a demurrer to the evidence in this case, the jury rendered! a conditional verdict of $2,000.00 for the plaintiff, and, the court having sustained the demurrer and dismissed the action,, the plaintiff obtained a writ of error to the judgment. The action has for its purpose recovery of damages for the' wrongful death of the plaintiff’s decedent, occasioned by the' breaking and fall

PER CURIAM:1 The appellant in this proceeding, Jo Ellen Karr, claims that the Circuit Court of Jackson County erred in refusing to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Board of Education of Jackson County to provide her with relief for its improper refusal to place her in a teaching position in the Jackson County schools.2 She argues that she was the most qualified

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2202 ROB STAR, Derivatively and on behalf of all Nominal Defendants, Oldfield Community Association, LLC, and Oldfield Club, LLC, and on behalf and for Oldfield Community Association, LLC’s and Oldfield Club, LLC’s respective members, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TI OLDFIELD DEVELO

662 F.Supp.2d 562 (2009) Vernon MERCIER, derivatively on behalf of Massey Energy Company, Plaintiff, v. Don L. BLANKENSHIP, Baxter Phillips, Jr., Dan Moore, E. Gordon Gee, Richard M. Gabrys, James Crawford, Bobby R. Inman, Robert H. Foglesong, H. Drexel Short, Jr., J. Christopher Adkins, Jeffrey M. Jarosinski, Lady Barbara Thomas Judge, Stanley C. Suboleski, Elizabeth Chamberlin, and Thomas Cook, Defendants, and Massey Energy Company, a Delaw

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Freddie Eugene Owens, Brad Keith Sigmon, Gary DuBose Terry, and Richard Bernard Moore, Respondents-Appellants, v. Bryan P. Stirling, in his official capacity as the Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections; South Carolina Department of Corrections; and Henry McMaster, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of South Carolina, Appellants-Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2022-001280 A

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2023 Term FILED _______________ November 8, 2023 No. 22-848 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAI

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Myra Anthony is an adult woman with Down Syndrome. Plaintiff-appellant Magdalene Wright is Anthony’s half-sister and legal guardian. On March 7, 2000, officers from the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) responded to a 911 call that originated from Wright’s apartment, in which a female caller reported that she was being attacked by a man with a knife and gun. The police ent

PER CURIAM: This case is before the court on appellant PaineWebber’s petition for reconsideration of our order of December 28, 1988, in which we dismissed its appeal for lack of jurisdiction. On the basis of newly enacted legislation, we vacate our prior order and reinstate the appeal. DISCUSSION On November 19, 1988, the President s

426 F.Supp.2d 356 (2006) Gene B. ADAMS and George Hashman and Howard Leon Powell, Jr. and James F. Kowcheck and John Weaver and Gerald C. Barlow and Teresa M. Barlow and Edsel W. Pack, Executor of the Estate of William A. Pack and Sally Silbernagel, Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael Grubryn, and Robert Lyle Copeland, Sr. and William J. Zuleski, Personal Representative for the Estate of William Zuleski, Individually and as representatives o

307 S.E.2d 620 (1983) The CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF WEST VIRGINIA v. Herschel H. ROSE, III, Tax Commissioner of the State of West Virginia. No. 15704. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. July 7, 1983. Rehearing Denied October 20, 1983. *621 David B. Frost, Charleston, John W. Plaatje, Was

483 F.Supp.2d 425 (2007) ASTENJOHNSON, Plaintiff v. COLUMBIA CASUALTY CO., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 03-1552. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 30, 2007. *426 *427 *428 *429 John N. Elliso

SWYGERT, Chief Circuit Judge. This case consolidates two actions, each of which attacks the constitutionality of sections 7-43(a), (d), and 7-44 of Chapter 46, Ill.Rev.Stat. Sections 7-43(a) and 7-44 condition voting in any primary upon a public declaration of party affiliation. Section 7-44 prohibits voting in the primary of one party if the voter has voted in the primary of another party within the preceding twenty-three m

283 S.E.2d 589 (1980) CITY OF FAIRMONT, a municipal corporation, doing business as Fairmont General Hospital v. RETAIL, WHOLESALE, AND DEPARTMENT STORE UNION, AFL-CIO, et al. No. CC911. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. October 21, 1980. Concurring Opinion June 18, 1981. *590 Furbee, Amos, Webb & Cri

339 F.3d 129 Myra ANTHONY and Magdalene Wright, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Richard Collegio, Gerald Migliaro, and John Does 1, 2, and 3, both individually and in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-7978(L). No. 02-7648(CON). United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

72 F.Supp. 843 (1947) COLUMBIAN FUEL CORPORATION v. UNITED FUEL GAS CO. UNITED CARBON CO. v. SAME. Civil Actions Nos. 694 and 695. District Court, S. D. West Virginia. July 29, 1947 Hodges & Revercomb, of Charleston, W. Va. (Arthur B. Hodges, of Charleston, W. Va., of counsel), for plaintiff Columbian Fuel Corporation. Osman E. Swartz, of Char

*782OPINION. Littleton: In this appeal there are four issues to be considered, as follows: (1) The market value of 225 shares of stock of the Kanawha Land Co. (2) The correctness of a claimed deduction of $10,000 charged by the Kanawha Banking & Trust Co. for a loan of $90,000. (3) Whether th

Emile C. deStubner filed his notice of motion for judgment in the amount of $37,111.61, with interest thereon, in the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, against the corporate defendants, United Carbon Company, Inc., and Microid Process, Inc. The circuit court heard the case on pleadings and proof in lieu of a jury, and rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff against both defendants in the total amount sought, to which judgment these writs of error are prosecuted. For convenience defe

269 U.S. 514 (1926) METCALF & EDDY v. MITCHELL, ADMINISTRATRIX. MITCHELL, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. METCALF & EDDY. Nos. 183 and 376. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted November 30, 1925. Decided January 11, 1926. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. *51

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter

304 U.S. 405 (1938) HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. GERHARDT.[*] No. 779. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 7, 8, 1938. Decided May 23, 1938. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *407 Assistant Solicitor General Bell, with whom Solicito