Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Eggers v. Cole”
Cole-Hatchard v. Eggerspublic domain
In two related actions to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Loehr, J.), dated August 14, 2013, as granted those branches of the motion of William Sherwood, a defendant in action No. 2, which were to consolidate the actions, in effect, to vacate an order dated August 3, 2011, granting the plaintiff’s motion
Cole v. Bensonpublic domain
760 F.2d 226 Frankie Levi COLE, Appellant,v.Charles L. BENSON, Frank O. Gunter, Charles Black, LynnWright, Adelbert W. Knight, Mario Peart, John T.Eggers, Steven L. Phillips, Appellees. No. 85-1051. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted March 28, 1985.Decided April 26, 1985. Fran
Cole v. Bensonpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Frankie Levi Cole, an inmate of the Nebraska State Penitentiary, filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking temporary and preliminary injunctive relief as well as damages for the failure or refusal of prison management to place Cole in a cell in which he will be free from harassment and annoyance by other prisoners. From a denial of such injunctive relief, Cole appeals.1 We affirm
State v. Colepublic domain
67 Wn.2d 522 (1965) 408 P.2d 387 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. FRED HOWARD COLE, Appellant. In the Matter of FRED HOWARD COLE, Petitioner, v. JACK D. PORTER, Respondent.[*] Nos. 37710, 37919. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. December 2, 1965. Bill Lanning and Robert S. Egger, for appella
Stephen C. Cole and Robert Strack v. Michael McWillie, Wanda Juanita Phillips, and Delvonne Burkepublic domain
OPINION JIM R. WRIGHT, CHIEF JUSTICE This court’s former opinion and judgment dated January 15, 2015, are withdrawn. This court’s opinion and judgment dated May 29, 2015, are substituted therefor. The motion for rehearing filed by Stephen C. Cole and Robert Strack is granted, and the motion for rehearing filed by Michael McWillie, Wanda Juanita Phillips,
Stephen C. Cole and Robert Strack v. Michael McWillie, Wanda Juanita Phillips, and Delvonne Burkepublic domain
Opinion filed January 15, 2015 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-12-00265-CV __________ STEPHEN C. COLE AND ROBERT STRACK, Appellants V. MICHAEL MCWILLIE, WANDA JUANITA PHILLIPS, AND
Stephen C. Cole and Robert Strack v. Michael McWillie, Wanda Juanita Phillips, and Delvonne Burkepublic domain
Opinion filed August 29, 2014 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-12-00265-CV __________ STEPHEN C. COLE AND ROBERT STRACK, Appellants V. MICHAEL MCWILLIE, WANDA JUANITA PHILLIPS, AND DELVONNE BURKE, Appellees On Appeal from the 238th Judicial Distri
Ashley v. Eggerspublic domain
Cole, 0. <1. In the Eevision of 1878 it is provided that the county court shall appoint convenient times and places when and where the court or commissioners will receive, examine, and adjust claims against an estate; and within sixty days after granting letters testamentary, or of administration, shall give notice of the times and places fixed for that purpose. Sec. 3839. It is said the statute contemplates, or requires, tha
United States v. Colepublic domain
Opinion of the Court PERRY, Judge: The appellant was convicted of murder and of sodomy, in contravention of Articles 118 and 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 918 and 925, respectively. He was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for life, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved the sentence, except he redu
993 F.2d 1337 Mitchell SHANDS, Don Key, Forrest Busch, Appellants,v.CITY OF KENNETT, Warren Karsten, John Mallott, Jerry Talley,John Vardell, Jingo Cole, individually and intheir official capacities, Appellees.Mitchell SHANDS, Don Key, Forrest Busch, Appellees,v.CITY OF KENNETT, Warren Karsten, John Mallott, Jerry Talley,John Vardell, Jingo Cole, individually and intheir official capacities, Appellants. <
Eggers v. Klussmannpublic domain
Lewis, J. It does not appear by the complaint what the wager was, where it was made, where the money was deposited with defendant, or whether the •demand was made before the money was paid over by the stakeholder to the winner. All wagers are not illegal at common law (1 Whart. on Contr. § 449). If illegal, it is, because they are made *229so by
Eggers v. Reemelinpublic domain
Smith, J.; Dempsey, J., and Murphy J., concur. The plaintiff is now and long prior to 1894 was the owner of real estate on the west side of Elm street in this city, and the defendant is now and during the same period of that time has been the owner of the real estate next adjoining that of plaintiff on the north side. The house of plaintiff was built up to the north line, and the house of defendant was built
State ex rel. Kendall v. Colepublic domain
By the Court, Coleman, J.: [1] The legislature, in 1913, passed an act providing for exhibits at the San Diego and San Francisco expositions (Stats. 1913, c. 128, p. 169), sections 1 and 2 of which read as follows: "Section 1. On or before the first Monday in May, 1913, the governor of the State of Nevada shall appoint a citizen of the State of Nevada to be known as
Parker v. Webster County Coal, LLCpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE KELLER In separate appeals, Marshall Parker challenges the constitutionality of Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) 342.730(4) and Webster County Coal (Webster County) challenges the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) award of benefits to Parker for a back injury. The Board affirmed the ALJ’s award of benefits but, because it lacks the jurisdiction to do so, the Board did not address
Hill v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.public domain
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Various residents of Scottsbluff, Nebraska (Plaintiffs) appeal from rulings by the district court1 adverse to their tort claims against the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) and Montana Rail Link (MRL). - We affirm. I. On November 4, 2000, 18 cars from an 84-car freight train operated by BNSF derailed in Scottsbluff. B
Youngja Lee v. Hong Kong Supermarketpublic domain
Youngja Lee v Hong Kong Supermarket (2023 NY Slip Op 01668) Youngja Lee v Hong Kong Supermarket 2023 NY Slip Op 01668 Decided on March 29, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Hinds v. 33rd St. Astoria, Inc.public domain
Hinds v 33rd St. Astoria, Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 04749) Hinds v 33rd St. Astoria, Inc. 2021 NY Slip Op 04749 Decided on August 25, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure
Hersko v. Herskopublic domain
Hersko v Hersko (2024 NY Slip Op 00894) Hersko v Hersko 2024 NY Slip Op 00894 Decided on February 21, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Arluck v. Brezinskapublic domain
Arluck v Brezinska (2020 NY Slip Op 00839) Arluck v Brezinska 2020 NY Slip Op 00839 Decided on February 5, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciar
Levine v. Singalpublic domain
Levine v Singal (2019 NY Slip Op 03438) Levine v Singal 2019 NY Slip Op 03438 Decided on May 2, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.