Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Edwin Martin Martinez”
United States v. Hernandez-Martinezpublic domain
BERZON, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals were brought by defendants seeking to reduce their sentences for drug-related crimes. They invoke 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows a court to reduce in certain circumstances a previously imposed sentence, and contend that the Supreme Court's recent interpretat
BEAM, Circuit Judge. Edwin Martinez, Jr. appeals his conviction, following a jury verdict, and sentence for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. sections 2113(a) and (d). We affirm. I. BACKGROUND The Liberty Savings Bank in St. Cloud, Minnesota was robbed on July 23, 2004, at approximately 9:20 a.m. The robber entered the bank, approached a teller, placed a gun on the counter in front of
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00868-CV FORT DUNCAN MEDICAL CENTER INC., Appellant v. Edwin Martin and Esther Martin, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Robert Edwin MARTIN and Esth
United States v. Edwin Martinez, Jr.public domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-4275 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the v. * United States District Court
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-13-00868-CV FORT DUNCAN MEDICAL CENTER INC., Appellant v. Edwin Martin and Esther Martin, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Robert Edwin MARTIN and Esther Martin, Individually
Carl Edwin Martin, II v. Statepublic domain
Carl Edwin Martin, II v. Statepublic domain
MARTIN V. STATE COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-04-233-CR CARL EDWIN MARTIN, II APPELLANT V. <
Edwin Antonio Osorio-Lopez v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-18-00197-CR EDWIN ANTONIO OSORIO-LOPEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 115th District Court Upshur County, Texas Trial Court No. 17914 Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion on Remand by Chief Justi
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 3, 2016 No. 04-15-00534-CV Patricia Jo KARDELL, Martin Murphy Snowden, Mickey Darrell Snowden, and Mary Delilla Snowden, Appellants v. Edwin V. ACKER, Jr., Stephen Adolph Acker,
Estate of Walter v. Corr. Healthcare Cos.public domain
William J. Martinez, United States District Judge By way of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, this lawsuit addresses whether John Patrick Walter *1203("Walter") received unconstitutionally deficient medical care while in pretrial detention
Pedro Elizondo Martinez, Jr. v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00802-CR 6433464 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS William J. Martinez, United States District Judge By way of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, this lawsuit alleges that John Patrick Walter (“Walter”) received unconstitutionally deficient medical care while in pretrial detention in Fremont County, Colorado, eventually causing his death. The Estate of Walter through its personal representative (“the Walter Estate”) therefore sues numerou
United States v. Jose Hernandez-Martinezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30309 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:98-cr-00572- MO-8 JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ, AKA Efigenio Aispuro-Aispuro, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30310
Kardell v. Ackerpublic domain
OPINION Opinion by: Patricia 0. Alvarez, Justice Patricia Jo Kardell, Martin Murphy Snowden, Mickey Darrell Snowden, and Mary Delilla Snowden (Snowden Heirs) appeal the trial court’s judgment declaring that Edwin V. Acker Jr,, Stephen Adolph Acker, Elaine Acker George, Sheila Acker (Reinke) Bonner, and Edwin Scott Acker (Acker Heirs) “own an undivided non-participating one-fifth of the who
Dimas-Martinez v. Statepublic domain
DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice. | Appellant Erickson Dimas-Martinez appeals an order of the Benton County Circuit Court convicting him of capital murder and aggravated robbery and sentencing him to death and life imprisonment, respectively.1 On appeal, he alleges that the circuit court erred in (1) denying his motion for a mistrial after informing the jury that thi
Edwin Peter Jimenez, Sr. v. Statepublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
State Of Iowa Vs. Edwin Bello Paredespublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 07–0237 Filed September 18, 2009 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. EDWIN BELLO PAREDES, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Douglas S. Russell, Judge. Defendant challenges conviction based on the district court’s exclusion of statements against penal interest made by another suspect
Martin v. Statepublic domain
176 S.W.3d 887 (2005) Carl Edwin MARTIN, II, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-04-233-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. October 13, 2005. *892 Mark Pilard, Granbury, for appellant. Robert T. Christian, Dist. Atty., Granbury, for appellee. PANEL B: DAUPHINOT, WALKER, and McCOY, JJ. <
Sierra-Pascual v. Pina Records, Inc.public domain
660 F.Supp.2d 196 (2009) Rafael SIERRA-PASCUAL, a/k/a Lito MC Cassidy, Plaintiff, v. PINA RECORDS, INC. et al., Defendants. Civil No. 08-1114 (GAG/BJM). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 24, 2009. *198 Francis A. Marquez-San Martin, Monique Guillemard-Noble, Nachman & Guillemard, San Juan, PR, for Plaint
State v. Martinpublic domain
SCHALLER, J., dissenting. “A conviction of the crime of conspiracy can be based on circumstantial evidence, for conspiracies, by their very nature, are formed in secret and only rarely can be proved otherwise than by circumstantial evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Leggett, 94 Conn. App. 392, 400, 892 A.2d 1000, cert. denied, 278 Conn. 911, 899 A.2d 39 (2006). I respectfully dissent from the