⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Edwards v. Wendover Funding Inc”

Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003-09-30 · Published · cited 25× · 266 Conn. 12; 836 A.2d 1124; 2003 Conn. LEXIS 376
Opinion BORDEN, J. The defendant, Anthem Health Plans, Inc., appeals1 and the plaintiffs, Edward Collins, a physician, and numerous other named physicians and groups of physicians,2 cross appeal from the order of the trial court granting in part, and denying in part, the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification3 of
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994-12-06 · Published · cited 9× · 450 S.E.2d 527; 117 N.C. App. 165; 1994 N.C. App. LEXIS 1199
450 S.E.2d 527 (1994) WACHOVIA BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOB DUNN JAGUAR, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 9421SC200. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 6, 1994. *528 Davis & Harwell, P.A. by Fred R. Harwell, Jr., Winston Salem, for plaintiff-appellant. Adams Kleemeier Hagan Hannah &a;
Johnson v. Johnsonpublic domain
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010-08-01 · Published · cited 0× · 269 F.R.D. 586; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82673
ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsider the denial of Plaintiffs Motion to Certify Class Action and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a supplemental memorandum setting forth the laws of all relevant jurisdictions and a second proposed trial plan. For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave is GRANTED, bu
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009-11-13 · Published · cited 1× · 263 F.R.D. 312; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108073
ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class Action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED. INTRODUCTION Panacryl Absorbable Sutures (“Panacryl Sutures”) are synthetic, braided, undyed, absorbabl
District Court, D. Maryland · 2012-09-19 · Published · cited 23× · 891 F. Supp. 2d 757; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134190; 2012 WL 4127619
MEMORANDUM CATHERINE C. BLAKE, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Dawn Stanley’s pet, a young French bulldog named Booker, suffered an intestinal injury after ingesting a piece of a chew toy. That toy was manufactured by T.F.H. Publications, Inc. (“TFH”), a subsidiary of Central Garden and Pet Corporation (“Central Garden”), and marketed under the Nylabone trade name as the. Double Action C
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006-04-04 · Published · cited 0×
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ________ 05-6035EM ________ In re: * * Louise M. Litzinger, * * Debtor. *
Swank v. Swankpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011-12-30 · Published · cited 5× · 2011 Ohio 6920
[Cite as Swank v. Swank, 2011-Ohio-6920.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROBERT L. SWANK, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees v. FREEMAN J. SWANK, JR., et al. Defendants-Appellants JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Julie A. Edwards, J. Case No. 2011 CA 8 OPINION CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING:
District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998-07-17 · Published · cited 10× · 225 B.R. 277; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19086; 1998 WL 514701
225 B.R. 277 (1998) In re Vencenza MADDALONI, Debtor. FORD CONSUMER FINANCE COMPANY, INC., Creditor-Appellant v. Vencenza MADDALONI, Gilbert Rosenbaum, Trustee, Appellees. No. CIV. A. 3-97-CV-1548. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. July 17, 1998. *278 Edward P. Jurkiewicz, Hunt, Leibert, Chester & Jacobson, Ha
District Court, D. Maryland · 2008-03-26 · Published · cited 21× · 252 F.R.D. 275; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64323; 2008 WL 3259511
MEMORANDUM WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, Senior District Judge. Pending before the Court is the “Motion to Dismiss In Part Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint” filed by Defendants, Fountainhead Title Group Corporation (Fountainhead), Assurance Title, LLC (Assurance), Long & Foster Real Estate, Inc. (Long & Foster), and Mid-States Title Insurance Agency, Inc. (Mid-States), Paper No. 78, and the
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006-04-04 · Published · cited 10× · 340 B.R. 897; 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1144; 2006 WL 852115
340 B.R. 897 (2006) In re Louise M. LITZINGER, Debtor. Louise M. Litzinger, Debtor-Appellant, v. The Estate of Victor Litzinger, Claimant-Appellee. No. 05-6035EM. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 2, 2006. Filed: April 4, 2006. *898
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2011-05-20 · Published · cited 15× · 450 B.R. 181; 2011 WL 2135723
450 B.R. 181 (2011) In re Steven J. STANWYCK, Debtor. Steven J. Stanwyck, Plaintiff, v. Judy L. Bogen, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 2:07-bk-19183-PC. Adversary No. 2:10-ap-02982-PC. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California, Los Angeles Division. May 20, 2011. *185 Steven J. Stanwyck, Santa Monica, CA, pro se.
In re Addamspublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2017-03-09 · Published · cited 6× · 564 B.R. 458; 77 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 537; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 641
MEMORANDUM OPINION TO DISMISS CHAPTER 13 CASE Alan S. Trust, United States Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Michael and Jamie Shapiro (the “Shapiros”), seeking to dismiss Debtor’s, Mary C. Addams, chapter 13 case (the “Motion to Dismiss”). The Shapiros hold a second mortgage lien against Debtor’s two-family property used as her primary residence, and claim Debtor. cannot conf
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-06-30 · Published · cited 85× · 898 N.W.2d 140; 2017 WL 2822483; 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 81
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–0362 Filed June 30, 2017 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. CHRISTOPHER GEORGE STORM, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dallas County, Randy V. Hefner, Judge. Defendant appeals his conviction claiming automobile exception to search warrant requirement should be abandoned. DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Daniel J. Rothman of M
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–0362 Filed June 30, 2017 Amended September 18, 2017 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. CHRISTOPHER GEORGE STORM, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dallas County, Randy V. Hefner, Judge. Defendant appeals his conviction claiming automobile exception to search warrant requirement should be abandoned. DISTRICT COURT J
Texas Supreme Court · 2016-01-08 · Published · cited 41× · 478 S.W.3d 649; 59 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 214; 2016 Tex. LEXIS 4; 2016 WL 91201
JUSTICE WILLETT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, JUSTICE GREEN, JUSTICE GUZMAN, JUSTICE LEHRMÁNN, JUSTICE BOYD, JUSTICE DEVINE, and JUSTICE BROWN joined, and in Parts I, II.B, III.C, and IV of which JUSTICE JOHNSON joined. Nearly a century ago,'a Texas attorney argued that the rule at issue hi this case made it “cheaper to kill a mare in Texas than it
District Court, D. Maryland · 2011-05-03 · Published · cited 7× · 274 F.R.D. 525; 2011 WL 1675262
*529 MEMORANDUM WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is a motion to certify plaintiff classes in the above-captioned related disputes. Plaintiffs Denise Minter, Jason Alborough and Rachel Alborough have moved the Court on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals, ECF No. 185 in Minter,
District Court, D. Maryland · 2003-07-21 · Published · cited 28× · 217 F.R.D. 178; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13516; 2003 WL 21800960
MEMORANDUM OPINION CHASANOW, District Judge. Presently pending and ready for resolution in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 are the following motions: (1) Defendants’ motion to strike class action allegations; (2) Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification; (3) Defendants’ motions to exclude all testimony and evidence from Plaintiffs’ expert witnesses Venkatesh Shankar, Richard Feinberg an
In Re Bulsonpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2005-05-27 · Published · cited 28× · 327 B.R. 830; 54 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 819; 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 1049; 2005 WL 1397149
327 B.R. 830 (2005) In re: Mark A. BULSON and Judith A. Bulson, Debtors. No. HG 03-13905. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan. May 27, 2005. *831 *832 Paul B. Newman, Esq., Newaygo, Michigan, for Debtors. Kim M. Rattet, Esq., Bingham Farms, Michigan, for Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.</
In Re Springmannpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2005-08-01 · Published · cited 3× · 328 B.R. 251; 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 1453; 2005 WL 1813287
328 B.R. 251 (2005) In re J. Michael SPRINGMANN, Debtor. No. 04-1508. United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia. August 1, 2005. *252 Richard H. Gins, Gins & Greenfeld, P.C., Washington, DC, for Debtor. Darrell W. Clark, for Marc E. Albert. OPINION REGARDING OVERRULING TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO CLAIMED EXEMPT
District Court, D. Maryland · 2012-08-28 · Published · cited 28× · 284 F.R.D. 328; 2012 WL 3711890
Memorandum Opinion RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. This case concerns an alleged price-fixing conspiracy in the market for titanium dioxide. Plaintiffs Haley Paint Company and Isaac Industries, Inc., and Intervening Plaintiff East Coast Colorants, LLC d/b/a Breen Color Concentrates (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) claim that Defendants E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. (“DuPont”), Huntsman Interna