⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Edwards v. Vo”

California Supreme Court · 2014-05-05 · Published · cited 410× · 58 Cal. 4th 1144; 171 Cal. Rptr. 3d 234; 324 P.3d 88; 2014 WL 3630750; 2014 Cal. LEXIS 3133
KENNARD, J.,* Concurring and Dissenting.—I concur in the majority opinion except in one respect: As to defendant Loi Tan Vo, the evidence is, in *1259my view, insufficient to support the jury’s torture findings. I would therefore reverse, as to Vo, the jury’s true finding on the torture-murder special-circums
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-06-27 · Published · cited 81× · 413 F.3d 1010; 67 Fed. R. Serv. 702; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 12695; 2005 WL 1523207
BYBEE, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Rick Vo (“Vo”) and his wife Brenda (“Brenda”) were indicted for conspiring to possess more than fifty grams of methamphetamine with intent to distribute and for aiding and abetting each other in the possession of more than fifty grams of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); 21 U.S.C. § 846. T
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 236 F. App'x 322
MEMORANDUM * The Social Security Commissioner denied Appellant Ahn Vo’s application for disability benefits. Vo seeks review alleging that the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) finding of “not disabled” is not supported by substantial evidence because the ALJ erred in discrediting Vo’s pain testimony. We now reverse and remand for an award of benefits. We hold that the ALJ did not prov
Vo v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993-05-28 · Published · cited 0× · 625 So. 2d 1178; 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 900; 1993 WL 179881
ON RETURN TO REMAND The appellant, Ky Van Vo, was convicted of murder and of assault in the first degree. We remanded this cause to the Circuit Court for Mobile County because the evidence presented at trial did not bring the offense under the statute defining assault in the first degree but did prove that the offense constituted assault in the second degree. We instructed the court to set aside the appellant's conviction for assault in the first degree and t
Vo v. Gorskipublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-06-10 · Published · cited 3× · 175 N.E.3d 594; 2021 Ohio 1957
[Cite as Vo v. Gorski, 2021-Ohio-1957.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA CHRIS VO, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 109962 v. : RICK GORSKI, ET AL., : Defendants-Appellees. :
Vo v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992-09-30 · Published · cited 14× · 612 So. 2d 1323; 1992 WL 241124
The appellant, Ky Van Vo, was convicted of murder, a violation of § 13A-6-2, Code of Alabama 1975, and of assault in the first degree, a violation of § 13A-6-20, Code of Alabama 1975. He was sentenced to life in prison on the murder conviction and 20 years in prison on the assault conviction. The state's evidence tended to show that the appellant shot and killed Thuy Nang Nguyen and that he shot Thong Nang Nguyen in
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997-04-02 · Published · cited 0× · 692 So. 2d 1306; 96 La.App. 3 Cir. 1495; 1997 La. App. LEXIS 824; 1997 WL 149972
11 SAUNDERS, Judge. An insured appeals the decision of the trial court dismissing its lawsuit against its fire insurer, Colony Insurance Company, to recover proceeds under a fire insurance policy. The trial court found that the insurer met its burden of proving an arson defense, and thus, dismissed plaintiffs claim finding that it was not entitled to the proceeds under the policy. For the following reasons, we affirm the j
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991-11-19 · Published · cited 140× · 935 F.2d 308; 290 U.S. App. D.C. 142
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: This case arises from the claim of the appellants, Thanh Vong Hoai, David He-menway and John Hemenway, that they were deprived of their civil rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (1988) during the course of prior litigation involvin
California Supreme Court · 2014-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 7/23/14 Unmodified opinion attached IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S049626 v. ) ) Santa Clara County STEPHEN EDWARD HAJEK ) Super. Ct. No. 148113 AN
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2014-09-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 3, 2014 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TAN VO Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 1107054 Honorable Paula L. Skahan, Judge No. W2013-02118-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 9, 2014 The Defendant, Tan Vo, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury of sexual batte
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998-03-23 · Published · cited 24× · 139 F.3d 980; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5610; 1998 WL 131263
SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge: We must decide whether the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Koeltl, J.) erred in confirming two international arbitration awards rendered by an allegedly corrupt tribunal where the losing party, knowing the relevant facts, chose to participate fully in the proceedings without disclosing those facts until after the adverse
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995-01-06 · Published · cited 199× · 652 A.2d 797; 539 Pa. 322; 1995 Pa. LEXIS 14
539 Pa. 322 (1995) 652 A.2d 797 LEHIGH COUNTY VO-TECH SCHOOL v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (WOLFE). Appeal of Robert C. WOLFE. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted March 2, 1994. Decided January 6, 1995. Reargument Denied March 15, 1995. *324 Edward R. Eidelman, Thomas Cal
United States v. Vopublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-10699 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-02-00411-ACK RICK K. VO, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023-10-04 · Published · cited 16× · 82 F.4th 1306
USCA11 Case: 22-10858 Document: 38-1 Date Filed: 10/04/2023 Page: 1 of 16 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10858 ____________________ PHYLLIS EDWARDS,
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County · 1985-07-31 · Published · cited 0× · 42 Pa. D. & C.3d 14; 1985 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 49
SHEELY, P.J., HISTORY This is an action to recover damages for an allegedly defective roof installed on the plaintiff’s school building in 1969-1970. Under provisions of the contract between plaintiff and the architect (Bogar and Bink) and plaintiff and the general contractor (H. B. Alexander and Son), the claims against both parties were referred to arbitration. The arbitrators found in favor of defendan
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2019-08-27 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued August 27, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00100-CR ——————————— EX PARTE MAURICE EDWARDS, Appellant On Appeal from the 209th District Court
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
PD-0224-15 V^\\k\ Edwards. Pvarme>/-\ UrV\\ Woo m Id5^ Ro5harooTxTte83 " FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS C_ourV c& (jf\m\ra\ Kppeate feb 27 :::j ^uprexne: (LoarV 6u\\^\aq Abel Acosta, Clerk P.O.Box \150B Au^Vva, Texas n>1\\ R£\ Endowed
Edwards v. Uricepublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008-07-17 · Published · cited 1× · 2009 OK CIV APP 20; 220 P.3d 1145; 2008 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 108; 2008 WL 6825747
CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge. T1 Defendant/Appellants, Rex Urice (Ur-ice) and BaneFirst, seek review of the trial court's judgment in favor of Plaintiff/Appel-lee, Patricia Bowers Edwards (Edwards), individually and as next friend of her son, Robert Drew Bowers (Drew), on Edwards claims to set aside for undue influence amendments her mother, Eloise Cooper Bowers (Bowers), made to The Eloise Cooper Bowers 1991 Trust (Bowers 1991 Tr
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2012-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered November 19, 2012 In The No. 05-12-00998-CR KEVIN DEWAYNE EDWARDS, Appellant VO THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 28935-422
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2023-10-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-0267 Filed October 11, 2023 SUSAN J. WALLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. KIMBERLY HURTIG, SHERRI LARKIN, KATHY EDWARDS, JEFF HURTIG, INC., and the ESTATE OF JANE BJORK, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for O’Brien County, Shayne Mayer, Judge. Susan Wallin a