Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Edwards v. US Department of Education”
Edwards v. Department of Educationpublic domain
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Edwards v. Department of Educationpublic domain
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Edwards v. Department of Educationpublic domain
544 U.S. 1034 EDWARDSv.DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. No. 04-1290. Supreme Court of United States. May 16, 2005. 1 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Petit v. United States Department of Educationpublic domain
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: While I join my colleagues in the judgment affirming the district court, I write separately to set out why I find the result troubling. The principal question before us is whether cochlear implant mapping — i.e., calibrating a cochlear implant so that an individual with profound hearing loss can receive and interpret auditory signals — is
Gard v. United States Department of Educationpublic domain
789 F.Supp.2d 96 (2011) John GARD, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 00-1096(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 9, 2011. *98 Ari Taragin, James Lawrence Fuchs, Snider & Associates, LLC, Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiff. Edward J. Martin, United Stat
Edwards v. Navient Solutions, Inc. (In re Edwards)public domain
Memorandum and Opinion Discharging Non-Stafford Portion of Navient Solutions, Inc. Student Loans Janice Miller Karlin, United States Chief Bankruptcy Judge This adversary proceeding is before the Court on Plaintiff/Debtor Paula Maxine Edwards’ complaint to discharge a portion of the student loans she owes Navient Solutions, Inc. (Navient) under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8).1 That stat
387 B.R. 182 (2008) In Re Donna GREGORY, Debtor. Donna Gregory, Plaintiff v. U.S. Department of Education, Defendant. Nos. 07-3018, 06-32819. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. April 1, 2008. *184 Edward Lee Schimmel, Hizer, Mahaffey & Schimmel, LLC, Northwood, OH, for Plaintiff. William J. Edwards, United
Hammer v. U.S. Department of Educationpublic domain
85 F.Supp.2d 191 (2000) Edward T. HAMMER, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Suffolk University, Marist College, and Suny Brockport, Defendants. No. CV 99-2973. United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 3, 2000. Edward T. Hammer, Garden City, NY, for Plaintiff Pro Se. Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New Y
315 B.R. 161 (2004) In re Nancy J. FOLSOM, Debtor. Nancy J. Folsom, Plaintiff, v. United States Department of Education, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 02-718-3F7. Adversary No. 02-238. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. July 21, 2004. *163 Edward P. Jackson, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff. <
Husbands v. Department of Educationpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EDWARD SCOT HUSBANDS § § No. 349, 2019 Appellant Below, § Appellant § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No.: N18A-0
City of Providence v. US Department of Justicepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1802 CITY OF PROVIDENCE and CITY OF CENTRAL FALLS, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, and the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendants, Appellants. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
Thomsen v. Department of Education (In Re Thomsen)public domain
234 B.R. 506 (1999) In re Raymond Edward THOMSEN and Kim Jonette Thomsen, Debtors. Raymond Edward Thomsen and Kim Jonette Thomsen, Plaintiffs, v. Department of Education, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 98-33578-7, Adversary No. 98/00171. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana, Butte Division. June 7, 1999. *507 Raymond E. Thom
Bronx Household of Faith v. Board of Educationpublic domain
650 F.3d 30 (2011) The BRONX HOUSEHOLD OF FAITH, Robert Hall, and Jack Roberts, Plaintiff-Appellees, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK and Community School District No. 10, Defendant-Appellants. Docket No. 07-5291-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: October 6, 2009. Decided: June 2, 2011.
CANADY, C.J., concurring. The manifest goal of the Petitioners and the dissenting justices is to put educational funding and educational policy firmly under the control of the judiciary. That is the only possible path forward once a judicial decision is made that "the State has failed to ensure that its allocations are the best use of funding," that "the State is not funding schools in an efficient manner," and that the State
Husbands v. Delaware Department of Educationpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY Edward Scot Husbands, Appellant, V. C.A. No.: N18A-04-009 JRJ Delaware Department of REDACTED Education and Delaware Professional Standards Board, Appellees. Date Submitted: April 10, 2019 Date Decided: July 8, 2019 Date Redacted: July 19, 2019 OPINION Upon Appeal from the Professional Standards Board: AFFIRMED. Anthony N. Delcollo, Esq., G. Kevin Fasic, Esq., Katherine Witherspoon Fry, Esq., Offit Kurman, P
Coleman-Edwards v. Simpsonpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Appellant Violet Coleman-Edwards, the former principal of Concord Baptist Elementary School in Brooklyn, New York, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Irizarry, J.). The district court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on her claims that Concord Baptist Church of Christ failed to (1) pay overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act
Coleman-Edwards v. Simpsonpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Appellant Violet Coleman-Edwards, the former principal of Concord Baptist Elementary School in Brooklyn, New York, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Irizarry, J.). The district court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on her claims that Concord Baptist Church of Christ failed to (1) pay overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge, concurring. I concur in affirming dismissal. As explained below, I believe that this case should be dismissed based on justiciability grounds, rather than the merits. One of the Secretary’s longstanding positions throughout this lawsuit has been that Plaintiffs’ claims are not justiciable, and I agree. The length and complexity of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (“NCLB” or “Ac
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) STATE OF MARYLAND, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 1:17-cv-2139 (KBJ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) EDUCATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
Ramos v. Department of Educationpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER CAMILLE L. VELEZ-RIVE, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION The present case is yet another in a long line of cases that swamp the federal docket every four (4) years following gubernatorial elections held in Puerto Rico, where the incumbent party is defeated. Plaintiffs are four (4) career employees of the Puerto Rico Department of Education, Josefina Arroyo