Cases

321 F.Supp. 68 (1971) Mary Helen EDWARDS, Du Wayne Galloway, Henry Richardson, and Elizabeth Tostevin, on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Wilbur J. SCHMIDT, Secretary, State Department of Health and Social Services, State of Wisconsin, and Sanger B. Powers, Administrator, Division of Corrections, State Department of Health and Social Services, State of Wisconsin, Defendants. No. 70-C-9

CLARENCE E. McMANUS, Judge. 12This is an appeal by David Schmidt from the trial court’s judgment concerning the custody of his daughter. For the reasons which follow, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Robyn and David Schmidt obtained a judgment of divorce on April 27, 2004. The parties had one daughter during their marriage. Prior to the judgmen

EGAN, C. J. *364Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010(4)1 , and reckless driving, ORS 811.140. He assigns error to the trial court's denial of his request to exclude evidence of his prior DUII convictions in a joint trial on both charges when the prior co

Review Denied.

OPINION STOWERS, Justice. I.. INTRODUCTION Six Alaska prisoners jointly filed a pro se putative class-action complaint against various Department of Corrections officials. Their complaint detailed 18 causes of action, many of which address changes in Department policy regarding inmate purchase and possession of gaming systems and res

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their action against a bankruptcy trustee. The court held that-it was necessary to obtain leave from the bankruptcy court before bringing such a suit. We AFFIRM. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In 2005, BFG Investments, acting through its president, John Villegas, filed for bankruptcy. Mich

ORDER PER CURIAM. On September 10, 2013, we ordered Bret D. Landrith to show cause why this court should not impose filing restrictions on him. Mr. Landrith has timely responded, but he has failed to demonstrate good cause why the proposed filing restrictions should not be imposed. It is therefore ordered that the filing restrictions proposed in this court’s September 10, 2013, order, a copy of which i

The opinion of the court was delivered by Stegall, J.: Steven Wade Edwards pled guilty to two counts of felony murder, one count of aggravated burglary, and one count of aggravated *559 robbery. Edwards subsequently moved to withdraw his plea. The district court denied Edwards' motion an

812 N.E.2d 1074 (2004) Kimberly S. SCHMIDT, Appellant-Petitioner, v. David A. SCHMIDT, Appellee-Respondent. No. 17A03-0401-CV-27. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 5, 2004. *1075 Daniel J. Sigler, D.J. Sigler Jr., Bloom Gates Sigler & Whiteleather, Columbia City, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. Edward E. Beck, Benjamin

Dismissed.

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 515 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY... 515 A. The Electronic Throttle Body... 515 B. Schmidt v. Ford Motor Company... 516 C. Gill v. Ford Motor Company... 516 D. Consolidation... 517

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS I, III, AND IV OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 54) C. Kathryn Preston, United States Bankruptcy Judge This cause came on for consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts I, III, and IV of First Amended Complaint (Doc. 54) (the “Motion”), filed on November 29, 2016; Defendant Edward F. Panos’ Memorandum in O

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their action against a bankruptcy trustee. The court held that it was necessary to obtain leave from the bankruptcy court before bringing such a suit. We AFFIRM. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In 2005, BFG Investments, acting through

692 F.Supp.2d 396 (2010) Olivia ALMENGOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Benno C. SCHMIDT, etc., et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 6585(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 11, 2010. *397 Phineas Edward Leahey, Julie Ann Rosselot, Michael Jason Fluhr, Todd R. Geremia, Jones Day, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs. Anto

GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: In bankruptcy, as in life, timing can be everything. After their bankruptcy was converted from a chapter 11 reorganization to a chapter 7 liquidation, Marco and Roxanne Cantu sued their bankruptcy attorney Ellen Stone for causes of action related to her representation prior to the conversion of their case. The chapter 7 trustee, Michael Schmidt, interv

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. Ford Motor Company (Defendant) moves to dismiss various counts in the present Complaint: Count I — breach of express warranty — as to all but Jason Schmidt; Counts II, IV, and V — claims of breach of implied warranty under Pennsylvania, California, and Arkansas law, respectively; Counts VI, VII, and VIII— claims of fraud and violations of Pennsylvania, Califo

OPINION A jury convicted appellant of retaliation by threat (a third-degree felony) and sentenced him to seven years' confinement and a $7,000 fine. The indictment alleged that appellant threatened to harm the victim "by an unlawful act, to-wit: striking" the victim in retaliation for or on account *Page 355 of her services as a prospective witness.1 The

Johnson, J., concurring: I agree with the majority’s result because there was evidence from which the jury could have found that Edwards intended to take the cell phone and hammer from Zenner, i.e., the taking was not merely incidental or accidental. Accordingly, this case could have been resolved without the necessity of disapproving the holding in State v. Montgomery, 26 Kan. App. 2d 346, 988 P.2d

Standridge, J.: Bobby D. Edwards was convicted of aggravated robbery. On appeal, he raises several arguments: (1) The State presented insufficient evidence to convict him of aggravated robbery; (2) the district court erred in instructing the jury on aggravated robbery; (3) the district court erred in allowing the State’s expert witness to testify at trial; (4) the district court erred when it limited Edwards’ direct examination

Hill, J.: In our system of ordered liberty, ordinances and statutes regulate the actions of people—while constitutions regulate the actions of states. In this case, we are confronted with the question whether the State has exceeded constitutional bounds by enacting a law making sexual relations between a teacher and student a crime. Charles L. Edwards, a Wichita area high school music instructor, engaged in sexual intercou