Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Edwards v. Permobil, Inc.”
571 F.Supp.2d 825 (2008) PERMOBIL, INC., and Goran Udden, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RLATED SERVICES CO., INC., d/b/a American Express, and American Express Bank, FSB d/b/a American Express, Defendants. No. 3:08-CV-0262. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. August 6, 2008. *828 Edward A. H
Schuring v. Cottrell, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Virginia M. Kendall, United States District Court Judge Plaintiff Gregory Schuring and his spouse, Mary Schuring, brought this action against Defendant Cottrell, Inc.1 after Gregory sustained injuries in a fall from a Cottrell-manufactured trucking rig during the course of his work as a truck driver hauling cars. Plaintiffs filed state claims in Il
Koenning v. Suehspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN D. RAINEY, Senior District Judge. Bradley Koenning (“Koenning”), Brian Martin (“Martin”), and Morgan Ryals (“Ryals”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) are three disabled young adults who allege that they require custom power wheelchairs with integrated standing features (“mobile standers”) to meet their medical, functional, and mobility needs. Defendant Thomas Suehs, Executive
ACCEPTED 03-15-00325-CV 6891639 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-15-00226-CV 6056931 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-15-00226-CV 5697644 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS