Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Edwards v. Hecht”
Bachman v. Hechtpublic domain
659 F.Supp. 308 (1986) Margot M. BACHMAN, J. Henry and Mary Esther Dasenbrock, Robert L. Duncan, Audrey K. Levy, Bruce E. Long, Robert B. and Caryl L. Wolf, Plaintiffs, Estate Chocolate Hole Landowners Association, William B. and Theresa A. Nelligan, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. Edward HECHT, Arsene Massac, Kurt A. Morcher, Heidi K. Morcher, and all Record Owners of Real Estate in Area of St. John, U.S.V.I., known as Estate Chocolate Hole, Defe
Edwards v. Statepublic domain
31 Kan.App. 2d 778 (2003) 73 P.3d 772 JEROME EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee. No. 89,647 Court of Appeals of Kansas Opinion filed July 25, 2003. *779 Gary C. West, of Topeka, for appellant. Deborah L. Hughes, assistant district attorney, Robert D. Hecht, distric
State v. Hechtpublic domain
Verellen, J. ¶ 1 A prosecutor improperly appeals to the passion and prejudice of a jury by using graphics in closing argument that show the defendant’s face with the word “GUILTY” superimposed in red.1 Michael Hecht was convicted of felony harassment and patronizing a prostitute. During closing argument, the prosecutor used multiple slides showing Hecht’s photograph with a large red “GUILTY” superimp
Edwards Aquifer Authority v. Chemical Lime, Ltd.public domain
Justice HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice O’NEILL, Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice BRISTER, Justice MEDINA, Justice GREEN, Justice JOHNSON and Justice WILLETT joined. Whether, as a general matter, an appellate court’s decision takes effect the moment the court issues its opinion, order, or judgment, or later when rehearing is denied or th
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1375 OPINION Plaintiffs Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, General Star Indemnity Company, and North Star Reinsurance Corporation (together Insurers) appeal a judgment of dismissal entered after the superior court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer of defendants McDonald, Hecht Solberg
Benton-Hecht Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Callpublic domain
782 S.W.2d 668 (1989) BENTON-HECHT MOVING & STORAGE, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Larry C. CALL, substituted for Lewis R. Crist, Director of the Missouri Division of Insurance, Respondent, and National Council on Compensation Insurance, Intervenor-Respondent. No. WD 41549. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. November 7, 1989. Motion to Modify o
Opinion issued April 11, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00215-CV ——————————— IN RE RONALD HECHT AND RAH CONTRACTORS, INC., Relators Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
In Re Hechtpublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justices FITZGERALD and MAZZANT. I. This case focuses on whether the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct, the judicial “rules of the road,” so to speak, prohibit a Texas state judge from speaking out favorably in behalf of a close friend nominated to the United States Supreme Court. This case hinges on the meaning of words in this Code and what words were
State Of Washington, V Michael A. Hechtpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 71059-1- C23 t*8 jr- -rj
Antanitis v. Hechtpublic domain
Opinion Pee Curiam, This is an appeal by defendant after a jury verdict for plaintiffs in claims arising from an automobile collision. The evidence as to negligence was conflicting, the verdicts were not excessive, and there was no error of law or abuse of discretion in the lower Court’s refusal to grant a new trial or a judgment n.o.v. Judgment affirmed. Mr. Justice Musma
Bachman v. Hechtpublic domain
849 F.2d 599 Bachman (Margot M.), Dasenbrock (J. Henry, Mary Esther)v.Hecht (Edward), Massac (Arsene), Estate Chocolate HoleLandowners Association, Nelligan (William B., Theresa A.) NO. 87-3494 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. MAY 04, 1988 Appeal From: D.V.I., Brotman, J.,
Fiore v. Hechtpublic domain
Edward M. O’Gorman, J. This is an application brought by the petitioners seeking to have this court declare invalid a nominating petition filed on behalf of the respondent Jack Economou, which designates him as a Democratic candidate for the office of Mayor of the City of Poughkeepsie, New York. The grounds of the application are based on the fact that the candidate Economou was not an enrolled Democrat at the time the petition w
Justice HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court. We decide in this case whether land ownership includes an interest in groundwater in place that cannot be taken for public use without adequate compensation guaranteed by article I, section 17(a) of the Texas Constitution. 1 We hold that it does. We
Hecht v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Launer v. Hechtpublic domain
*966[In each action] Appeals dismissed, without costs, unless appellants shall file and serve record, brief and note of issue on or before December 11, 1961 and be ready for argument at the January 1962 Term of this court, in which event motion denied.
Edwards Aquifer Authority v. Braggpublic domain
OPINION Opinion by: SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice. In an opinion and judgment dated August 28, 2013, we reversed the trial court’s judgment and remanded for further proceedings consistent with our opinion. On September 26, 2013, appellees filed a motion for rehearing. We deny the motion; however, we withdraw our opinion and judgment of August 28, 2013, and issue this opinion and judgment i
Edwards Transfer Co., Inc. v. Brownpublic domain
740 S.W.2d 47 (1987) EDWARDS TRANSFER COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. Glenn Ray BROWN, Ricky Brown, Kay King, and Mary Jenkins, Appellees. No. 05-86-00775-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. October 16, 1987. Rehearing Denied November 18, 1987. *48 Jack Pew, Michael L. Knapek, Dallas, for appellant. Robert
EDWARDS TRANSFER CO., INC. v. Brownpublic domain
764 S.W.2d 249 (1987) EDWARDS TRANSFER COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. Glenn Ray BROWN, Ricky Brown, Kay King, and Mary Jenkins, Appellees. No. 05-86-00775-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. October 16, 1987. Rehearing Denied December 1, 1987. *250 Michael L. Knapek, Terry Hyatt, Dallas, for appellant. To
246 B.R. 185 (1999) In re LiTENDA MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Debtor. Barbara A. Edwards, Chapter 7 Trustee for Debtor, LiTenda Mortgage Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation d/b/a Freddie Mac, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 96-40632 (NLW). Adversary No. 98-2881. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. March 29, 1999.
Montgomery Engineering Company, a New Jersey Corporation, and William Hecht and May Belle Hecht v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM: This case involves the tax treatment of $50,000 paid out of the funds of a closely held corporation, controlled by its president and principal stockholder William Hecht, upon the' death of Oscar Nicholson, a corporate officer and director, to the widow of the decedent-who had been bitterly estranged from her husband fo