Cases

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 13-19-00295-CR James Edward Tubbs v. The State of Texas On Appeal from the 12th District Court of Walker County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 28186 JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COUR

NUMBER 13-19-00295-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JAMES EDWARD TUBBS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 12th District Court of

Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) appeals the denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict following a jury trial and judgment awarding Thomas and Dana Tubbs (the Tubbses)1 $2,598,000 in actual damages and $1,231,000 in punitive damages for BNSF's negligence in *328failing

RANDOLPH, Presiding Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Thomas Tubbs was indicted, tried, and found guilty by a Warren County jury of molestation and sentenced by the trial judge to fifteen years’ imprisonment. 1 Aggrieved, Tubbs appeals.to this Court, arguing the trial court erred in admitting- the child-vict

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Flood waters from the Missouri River heavily destroyed the family farm of Thomas and Dana Lynn Tubbs in 2011. The Tubbses attribute the total loss to BNSF Railway Company’s maintenance of a railway embankment running across their farm. The Surface Transportation Board (“Board”) concluded that the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1

[Cite as State v. Tubbs, 2024-Ohio-5042.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. QUAYSHAUN WILLIE TUBBS, Defendant-Appellant.

451 N.W.2d 177 (1990) Edward TUBBS, State Superintendent of Banking, State of Iowa, Receiver, Appellant, v. UNITED CENTRAL BANK, N.A., DES MOINES, Iowa n/k/a First Interstate Bank of Des Moines, N.A., Appellee. No. 87-1691. Supreme Court of Iowa. January 24, 1990. As Corrected January 25 and January 29, 1990. *178

OPINION OGG, Judge. The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court erred by revoking defendant’s probation where there was never a written petition for revocation filed or served upon the defendant. This is a consolidated appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant/defendant Arlie Gene Tubbs for the crime of robbery with a deadly weapon i

Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (Farm Bureau), the appellant, filed this suit against the two appellees, H. C. Tubbs and Roy E. Corder, under the Declaratory Judgment Act, Code of Ala., Tit. 7, § 156 et seq. to have determined by the equity court the rights, status, and other legal relations of the parties under an automobile liability policy of insurance which Farm Bureau issued to Tubbs as the named insured and which was in full force and effect when the accide

McCOMB, J. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal in favor of defendant following her failure to amend her second amended complaint after the sustaining of a general demurrer. Facts: On May 25, 1964, plaintiff filed a complaint for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by her on May 27, 1963, while she was a passenger on one of defendant's busses that collided with another bus operate

OPINION OF THE COURT JOHNSON, Senior Judge: The appellant was tried by a general court-martial consisting of officers. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon and two specifications each of simple assault and conduct unbecoming an officer, in violation of Articles 128 and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 928 and 933 (1982), respectively [hereinafter

Larson, J.: Bert B. Lewis III and Tonya Lewis May, the residuary takers under the will of Esther Tubbs, appeal the total deple*397tion of the estate’s residuary by fhe payment therefrom of fhe Generation Skipping Transfer Tax (GSTT) imposed by the Internal Revenue Code § 2601 et seq. (1988). The residuary takers contend: (1) The GSTT should hav

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 06-3376 L YNNE B LOCH, H ELEN B LOCH and N ATHAN B LOCH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. E DWARD F RISCHHOLZ and S HORELINE T OWERS C ONDOMINIUM A SSOCIATION, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Distri

PER CURIAM. Appellant, serving a ten-year sentence imposed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas at the United States Penitentiary in Leavenworth, Kansas, sought a hearing in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas upon his petition for habeas corpus. The court denied the petition wi

OPINION OF THE COURT John L. DeMabco, J. The People appeal from an order of the Town of East Rochester Justice Court (41 Misc 3d 185 [2013, Brown-Steiner, J.]) granting defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment of conviction entered against him February 11, 2013, following defendant’s guilty plea to one count of driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]). The plea also satisfied transact

PER CURIAM: Jamie Byrd was convicted of armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d); the use of a firearm during the commission of a bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c); and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Byrd appeals his convictions on all three coun

53 Wn.2d 35 (1958) 330 P.2d 718 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Clarence A. Tubbs et al., Petitioners, v. THE CITY OF SPOKANE et al., Respondents and Relators, THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, Thomas G. Jordan, Judge, Respondent.[1] No. 34878. The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One. October 15, 1958.

73 So.3d 1169 (2011) Scott HARRISON and Mona Harrison, Appellants v. MAYOR & BOARD OF ALDERMAN OF the CITY OF BATESVILLE and Memphis Stone & Gravel Company, Appellees. No. 2009-CA-00981-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. October 26, 2010. Rehearing Denied March 22, 2011. Paul Bowie Watkins Jr., Pope Shannon Mallette, Oxford, attorneys for

Harrington, J., delivering the opinion of the Court: With certain exceptions that need not be considered, Section 17 of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 (11 USCA § 35) provides that, “A discharge in bankruptcy shall release a bankrupt from all of his provable debts”; and it is not denied that the plaintiffs’ judgment was duly scheduled or that it was in that class of debts covered by the <

Appellant, Douglas Edwards, a minor, appeals from the "revocation of his probation" by the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, Juvenile Division. Appellant submits that procedural errors committed by the trial court warrant a reversal of the "revocation." Appellant's mother, Judy Edwards, filed a complaint in the trial court on October 23, 1992, alleging that appellant committed a theft in violation of R.C. 2913.02(A)(1). Appellant admitted the