Cases

Fischer, J., dissents.

80 So.3d 713 (2011) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee v. Garrett John BARTON, Appellant. No. 46,792-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. December 14, 2011. *714 James Edward Beal, Louisiana Appellate Project, Jonesboro, LA, for Appellant. Charles R. Scott, II, District Attorney, R. Bennett Langford, III, Catherine

632 F.3d 9 (2011) Gordon BARTON, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Edward J. CLANCY, Jr., individually and in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Lynn, Massachusetts, Defendant, Appellee. No. 08-2479. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard October 7, 2009. Decided January 14, 2011. *11 Harold L. Lichten, wi

COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Justice. |,Appellants Barton Land Services, Inc., and the heirs, successors, and assigns of grantors of a mineral deed appeal the Van Burén County Circuit Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees, SEECO, Inc., and the heirs, successors, and assigns of the deed’s grantee. |?For reversal, appellants argue that the circuit court erred in granting summary judgment a

OPINION SUE WALKER, Justice. I. Introduction The sole issue we address is whether we possess jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying Appellants Judy A. Jennings and Rebecca E. Bell-Metereau’s motion to dismiss filed pursuant to the Texas Citizens’ Participation Act (TCPA)1 set forth in chapter 27 of the Texas Civil P

Greaney, J. A single justice of this court has reported the question whether the Commonwealth is barred by the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Federal Constitution from retrying Edward R. Barton, Jr. (hereinafter the defendant), on two felony indictments after his initial trial terminated in a mistrial. We conclude that there was no “manifest necessity” for the declaration of a mistrial and,

385 Mass. 517 (1982) 432 N.E.2d 524 EDWARD R. BARTON, JR. vs. COMMONWEALTH. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. December 7, 1981. March 5, 1982. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., WILKINS, LIACOS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, LYNCH, & O'CONNOR, JJ. Walter B. Prince for the defendant. David B. Mark, Legal Assistant to th

817 A.2d 834 (2003) C. Peyton BARTON, Jr., Appellant v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee. No. 00-CV-869. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued June 5, 2002. Decided March 6, 2003. *836 C. Michael Tarone, with whom John F. Karl, Jr., Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appellant. Edward E. Schwab, A

262 B.R. 26 (2000) Peter BARTON; J. Anthony Boeckh; Robert Campbell; Dale W. Church; Tom Curran; Edward A Dohring; Sharon Duker; Brian Enright; John Fedele; Walter M. Fiederowicz; Goldberg Charitable Trust; Alan P. Goldberg; Libby Goldberg; Robert J. Higgins; Dan Hogan; Hugh A. Johnson, Jr.; Ken Leichman; Michael Lindburg; Michael Lounsberry; Louise Lounsberry; Michael D. Marvin; Martin J. Mastroianni; Patricia Mastroianni; Daniel V. McNamee, III; George

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER HURD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs filed this action on September 9, 1998, alleging securities fraud, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a). They filed an amended complaint on December 18, 1998. On July 15, 1999, upon stipulation of the parties, reference to the Bankruptcy Court was withdrawn and the adversary proceeding cases, 99-MC-58, 99-MC-59, 9

[Cite as Barton v. Barton, 2017-Ohio-980.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT GREENE COUNTY DOUGLAS C. BARTON : : Plaintiff-Appellant : Appellate Case No. 2016-CA-12 : v.

14 B.R. 272 (1981) In re Mary C. PAINE, Bankrupt. Edward Reed BARTON, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Joseph CHRYSLER, Trustee. No. K80-907 CA. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D. August 4, 1981. Edward R. Barton, Allegan, Mich., pro se. Robert J. Barnard, Kalamazoo, Mich., for petitioner/appellant. David Davidoff, Kalamazoo, Mich., for trus

ORDER BURRAGE, District Judge. On June 2, 2000, United States Magistrate Judge Sam A. Joyner issued a Report and Recommendation, wherein he recommended that Third-Party Defendant, The Holmes Organisation, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment be denied. On June 20, 2000, Third-Party Defendant, The Holmes Organisation, Inc., filed a motion requesting Magistrate Judge Joyner to reconsider his Report

ORDER BURRAGE, District Judge. On June 2, 2000, United States Magistrate Judge Sam A. Joyner issued a Report and Recommendation, wherein he recommended that Third-Party Defendant, The Holmes Organisation, Inc.’s motion to dismiss Counts III and IV of the Second Amended Third-Party Complaint be denied. Presently before the Court is the objection of Third-Party Defendant,

CRIST, Judge. Appellant (Business Invitee) appeals the granting of summary judgment in favor of Respondent (Landlord) in a personal injury action. Business Invitee sustained injuries when she fell through a hole in a floor of the premises owned by Landlord. Landlord had rented the premises to Mark Hoelscher (Tenant) by an oral lease. We reverse and remand. We view the evidence in the light most favorable t

Case: 23-11237 Document: 115-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit _____________ United States Court of Appeals No. 23-11237 Fifth Circuit consolidated with FILED

715 S.E.2d 529 (2011) Denise H. BARTON, Plaintiff v. John S. BARTON, Defendant. No. COA10-1160. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 6, 2011. *530 Tharrington Smith, LLP, Raleigh, by Alice C. Stubbs, H. Suzanne Buckley, and Steve Mansbery, for plaintiff-appellee. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, L.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO . 02-2259 BARNEY O. PADGETT , APPELLANT , V. R. JAMES NICHOLSON , SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING EN BANC Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on Rehearing En Banc (FRAP and Local Rule 35), the Suggestion for Rehearing En

[Cite as In re Resignation of Barton, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-1232.] IN RE RESIGNATION OF BARTON. [Cite as In re Resignation of Barton, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-1232.] Attorneys at law—Resignation with disciplinary action pending—Gov.Bar R. VI(11)(C). (No. 2019-0386—Submitted March 27, 2019—Decided April 4, 2019.) ON APPLICATION FOR RETIREMENT OR RESIGNATION PURSUANT TO GOV.BAR R. VI(11).