Cases

The opinion of the court was delivered by FALL, J.A.D. In this easement dispute action plaintiffs appeal from entry of summary judgment dismissing their complaint. The issues posed in the appeal are whether a valid, enforceable access easement to the Shrewsbury River running in favor of plaintiffs exists across property owned by defendants Herbert and Ruth Cahn by virtue of a deed of easement executed on

709 F.Supp. 582 (1989) CABLE ASSOCIATES, INC., et al. v. The TOWN & COUNTRY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION t/a Superior Cable Company (Two Cases). Civ. A. Nos. 88-5224, 88-5225. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 15, 1989. *583 Edward M. Foley, Brutscher, Brutscher & Foley, Kennett Square, Pa., for plaintif

Sammy Cahn, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent; Gloria Cahn, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentCahn v. CommissionerDockets Nos. 84038, 84039United States Tax Court

597 F.Supp.2d 123 (2009) Falen GHEREBI, Petitioner, v. Barack H. OBAMA, President of the United States, and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, Respondents. Taj Mohammad, Petitioner, v. Barack H. OBAMA, President of the United States, et al., Respondents. Karin Bostan, Petitioner, v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al., Respondents. Nasrullah, Petitioner, v. Barack H. Obama, President of

OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting judgment for the Secretary of Health and Human Services, thereby affirming the Secretary’s order denying Social Security disability benefits and supplemental security income to appellant Edward L. Caff

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge. This action was initiated by the Township of Piscataway and a group of homeowners to prevent Duke Energy Operating Company, LLC (“Duke”) and Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (“Texas Eastern”) from removing fifty shade trees planted along a public street in Piscataway, New Jersey. The companies claimed that it was nece

OPINION OF THE COURT ON RECONSIDERATION ARQUILLA, Judge: At a general court-martial, the appellant was ultimately tried on four specifications of larceny in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1988).1 He pleaded guilty by exceptions and substitutions to a lesser offense of wrongful appropriation as to each specification. A court of officer

757 F.Supp. 1434 (1991) Edwin KOTROSITS, Julius Ruggeri, and Marvyn Souders, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. GATX CORPORATION NON-CONTRIBUTORY PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES. Civ. A. No. 88-1835. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 25, 1991. *1435

510 F.Supp. 292 (1980) Robert L. GOLDBERG et al. v. Curtis TARR et al. Civ. A. No. 71-1480. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. February 19, 1980. Donald L. Weinberg, Kohn, Savett, Marion & Graf, P. C., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. William Z. Elliott, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants. MEMORANDUM

488 F.3d 203 TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY; Allen Howard; Peggy Friedman; Robert Heseltine; Gail Heseltine; Edwin Markano; William Mallek; Guy Suabedissen; Timothy Simmonds; Patricia Simmonds; Judith Payne; Michael Matuch; Donna Matuch; Theresa Fleming; Angelo Bariso; Charlene Bariso; Kyllene Cox; Norman Herman; Libby Herman; Naomi Shapiro; Joel Shapirov.DUKE ENERGY; Texas Eastern Transmission, Corp., Appellants. No. 05-4

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM In this case involving the validity of certain acts and resolutions of the Virgin Islands Legislature, plaintiff legislators Virdin C. Brown and Adelbert M. Bryan appeal from an order of the appellate division of the District Court of the Virgin Islands dismissing their complaint as presenting nonjusticiable political questions and reversing the territorial court's entry of a dec

973 F.2d 1118 Virdin C. BROWN, Adelbert M. Bryan, Almando Liburd, Elmo D.Roebuck, Stephanie Scott-Williams, ArturoWatlington, Jr., Celestino Whitev.Alicia HANSEN, Lorraine L. Berry, Malcolm C. Callender, BentLawaetz, Lilliana Belardo de O'Neal, Holland L. Redfield,II, John F. Tutein, St. Clair N. Williams, AlexanderFarrelly, Government of the Virgin IslandsVirdin C. Brown and Adelbert M. Bryan, Appellants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, District Judge. Defendants Zimmer, Inc. and its affiliates (“Defendants” or “Zimmer”) are manufacturers of the Zimmer NexGen knee implant devices that are the subject of this multidistrict litigation (“MDL”). In this motion, Defendants seek authority under certain conditions to contact prospective expert witnesses who also happen to be treating physician

OPINION OF THE COURT Edward J. Greenfield, J. Motions numbered 108 of January 11, 1982 and 174 of November 10, 1981 are consolidated for disposition. In each, defendant City of New York moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) to dismiss the complaint upon the grounds plaintiffs have failed to state a cause of action for counsel fees and expenses in connection with prior Heart Bill

ESCHBACH, District Judge. Plaintiffs have appealed from an order dismissing their civil rights action arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, jurisdiction having been alleged pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343 and 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Plaintiffs below sought a mandatory injunction to require the City of Kokomo, Indiana, to issue a license for the operation of certain film viewing machines. Plaintiffs further sought a judgment declaring the lic

465 F.2d 169 Larry DEVLIN and Jimmie Joe Floyd. t/a J & J Book Store,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Charles SOSBE, Chief of Police of the City of Kokomo,Indiana, Harold Scott, Jr., Mayor of the City ofKokomo, Indiana, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 71-1676. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued June 9, 1972.D

ORDER ANN ALDRICH, District Judge. On September 22, 1994, the plaintiffs filed a motion (Doc. # 117) that this action be maintained as a class action. For the reasons stated below, this Court hereby denies plaintiffs’ motion. I. This action is brought by a number of women who claim they have suffered damage to their reproductive systems due to their expos

Defendant-appellant, USX Corporation, appeals the order of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas entered March 24, 1997, wherein the court granted plaintiffs-appellees' motion for the establishment of a Voluntary Registry for Unimpaired Asbestos Claims, thereby establishing such a registry. For the reasons stated below, we dismiss the appeal. *Page 363 The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows. In 1997 there were approximately 5,400 a

390 U.S. 629 (1968) GINSBERG v. NEW YORK. No. 47. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 16, 1968. Decided April 22, 1968. APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. *630 Emanuel Redfield argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state