⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Edward Neil Moore”

Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-12-10 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 10 2019, 9:22 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1991-04-10 · Published · cited 1× · 761 F. Supp. 112; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9611; 1991 WL 58817
761 F.Supp. 112 (1991) Teresa Lynn MOORE and her father and next friend Daniel Moore, Plaintiffs, v. Neil HYCHE, individually and as Superintendent of Instruction of the Tuscaloosa County Board of Education; Bobby Walker, individually and as Principal of Tuscaloosa County High School; Faye Leavelle, individually and as the Sponsor of the Tuscaloosa County High School Beta Club, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 90-G-1057-W. <
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018-09-06 · Published · cited 127× · 903 F.3d 553
THAPAR, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. The Fourth Amendment provides, in relevant part, that "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated." U.S. Const. amend. IV. This mandate, though seemingly straightforward, has generated a morass of legal precedent that is often
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995-05-17 · Published · cited 0×
Plaintiff failed to file a Form 44 Application for Review or Brief stating grounds for this appeal or specifying errors, and defendants have moved to dismiss. It is noted that the Deputy Commissioner resolved the causation issue based on medical records and first hand evaluation of several witnesses. Consequently, the claimant's appeal should be, and hereby is, DISMISSED, and the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner remains the final decision of the Commission. I.C. Rule 701.
Moore v. Newtonpublic domain
District Court, E.D. New York · 2016-12-01 · Published · cited 7× · 220 F. Supp. 3d 275; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165972; 2016 WL 7011476
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, United States District Judge: On August 4, 2014, Plaintiff Kenneth E. Moore filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Western District of New York, seeking immediate release from Rik-ers Island and alleging that he continued to be held in custody after charges against him were dismissed. (Pet. for Writ of Ha-beas Corpus, No. 14-CV-5524 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 20
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013-03-28 · Published · cited 1× · 710 F.3d 818; 2013 WL 1235259; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 6186
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Neil E. Havlik of receipt and possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) and (a)(4)(B). The district court 1 sentenced him to 144 months’ imprisonment, to be followed by 15 years’ supervised release. Havlik appeals the conviction on several grounds, an
Moore v. Dickhautpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016-11-22 · Published · cited 8× · 842 F.3d 97; 2016 WL 6872648; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21021
HOWARD, Chief Judge. Appellant Anthony Moore filed the instant habeas petition seeking to set aside his 2006 Massachusetts conviction for unarmed robbery. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Moore’s sole contention on appeal is that the admission of certain identification evidence at his trial violated due process. Because the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s adjudication of this issue did not con
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981-08-24 · Published · cited 70× · 658 F.2d 466; 5 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 902
PER CURIAM. This appeal concerns the interpretation of a portion of a decree dissolving a marriage in Indiana. The District Court concluded that an obligation to pay mortgage payments incorporated into the property settlement agreement was non-dischargeable in bankruptcy. We note jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. Dennis and Joyce Maitlen, b
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002-10-10 · Published · cited 256× · 306 F.3d 1247; 53 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1069; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 21144; 2002 WL 31261938
SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Keenan, J.) denying class certification under Fed. R. Civ. P 23(b)(3). Plaintiffs based their RICO and fraud claims on the oral misrepresentations made by PaineWebber’s brokers, arguing that PaineWebber engaged in a common scheme to misrepresen
Moore v. Harperpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-27 · Published · cited 49× · 600 U.S. 1
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–65 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are reque
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991-07-26 · Published · cited 84× · 938 F.2d 565; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 16706; 1991 WL 137368
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion November 6, 1990, 5th Cir., 917 F.2d 873) Before POLITZ, KING and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. KING, Circuit Judge: We grant rehearing and withdraw our prior opinion, reported at 917 F.2d 873 (5th Cir.1990), and substitute the following:
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990-11-06 · Published · cited 5× · 917 F.2d 873; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19572; 1990 WL 169324
917 F.2d 873 Jerry Lynn YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Neil B. BIGGERS, Jr., et al., Defendants,J.W. Collins, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-4116. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Nov. 6, 1990. King, Circuit Judge, filed concurring opinion. Jerry Lynn Young, Par
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999-08-20 · Published · cited 203× · 189 F.3d 165; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20180
189 F.3d 165 (2nd Cir. 1999) ROBERT L. MOORE and JEANNETTE S. PARRY, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.PAINEWEBBER, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 98-9426August Term, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSSECOND CIRCUIT Argued: May 25, 1999Decided: Aug. 20, 1999 Appeal from a judgment of the United States Dis
Freed v. Friedmanpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-10-17 · Published · cited 15× · 215 F. Supp. 3d 642; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143134; 2016 WL 6070357
Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge Eric Freed brought, then voluntarily dismissed, and then brought again this diversity suit against Neil Friedman, C.P.A., P.C., d/b/a Michael Silver & Co., an accounting firm. Doc. 25; see Freed v. Neil Friedman, C.P.A., P.C., No. 14 C 7241 (N.D. Ill. filed Sept. 17, 2014). Freed alleges that Ronald Weiss, an accountant
Traynor v. O'NEILpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2000-03-07 · Published · cited 3× · 94 F. Supp. 2d 1016; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6858; 2000 WL 356409
94 F.Supp.2d 1016 (2000) Timothy TRAYNOR and Luann Traynor, Plaintiffs, v. Richard O'NEIL, General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin, and Thomas & Betts Corporation, Defendants. No. 99-C-0773-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. March 7, 2000. *1017 Ardell W. Skow, Doar, Drill & Skow, Office Park, Baldwin, WI, for Tim
Bishop v. Bishoppublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010-10-22 · Published · cited 0× · 100 So. 3d 538; 2010 WL 4151988; 2010 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 296
THOMAS, Judge. Sharon Jaynae Bishop (“the former wife”) appeals from a judgment of the Mobile Circuit Court terminating the periodic-alimony obligation of Ervin Edward Bishop (“the former husband”) after it determined that the former wife had cohabited with a member of the opposite sex, pursuant to § 30-2-55, Ala.Code 1975.1 We reverse and remand.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-06-05 · Published · cited 0×
06/05/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 7, 2023 Session HIDDEN LAKE RESORTS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. V. CHARLES Z. MOORE ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Cheatham County No. 16577 David D. Wolfe, Chancellor No. M
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-06-09 · Published · cited 98× · 824 F.3d 919
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD PERUTA; MICHELLE No. 10-56971 LAXSON; JAMES DODD; LESLIE BUNCHER, DR.; MARK CLEARY; D.C. No. CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL 3:09-cv-02371- ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, IEG-BGS Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; WILLIAM D. GORE, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff, Defenda
State v. Moorepublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000-12-11 · Published · cited 37× · 540 S.E.2d 445; 343 S.C. 282; 2000 S.C. LEXIS 226
343 S.C. 282 (2000) 540 S.E.2d 445 The STATE, Respondent, v. Lawrence Edward MOORE, Petitioner. The State, Respondent, v. Terrance Wideman, Petitioner. No. 25217. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard October 17, 2000. Decided December 11, 2000. *284 Assistant Appellate Defend
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009-06-24 · Published · cited 8× · 15 So. 3d 334; 2009 La. App. LEXIS 1336; 2009 WL 1773209
15 So.3d 334 (2009) D'ARGENT PROPERTIES, LLC and Stratmore, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellants v. CITY OF SHREVEPORT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 44,457-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. June 24, 2009. *336 Blanchard, Walker, O'Quin & Roberts, by M. Thomas Arceneaux Jerry Edwards, Shreveport, for Appellants. Neil Er