⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Edward J. Gehl”

Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992-06-17 · Published · cited 8× · 486 N.W.2d 284; 1992 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 263; 1992 WL 133276
486 N.W.2d 284 (1992) In re the MARRIAGE OF Linda Susan GEHL and Edward Vincent Gehl Upon the Petition of Linda Susan Gehl, n/k/a Linda Susan Bickel, Appellee, And Concerning Edward Vincent Gehl, Appellant. No. 91-429. Supreme Court of Iowa. June 17, 1992. *285 Robert C. Nelson, Cedar Rapids, for appellant. Hugh G. Albrech
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002-06-20 · Published · cited 4× · 293 F.3d 895; 170 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2359; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 12158; 2002 WL 1209922
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Rene Minjares, John F. Perry, Gerald S. Ross, William E. Twyman, and Bruce Forrest (collectively, the “Phots”), appeal from the district court’s ruling that the proposed merger of the Phots’ union, the Independent Association of Continental Phots (“Independent”), with another union, the Air Line Phots Association International (“Air Lin
Koeppel v. Clementspublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950-01-12 · Published · cited 0× · 41 N.W.2d 198; 256 Wis. 388; 1950 Wisc. LEXIS 323
Separate actions were commenced by Koeppel Kar Ko and Dennis Koeppel against Donald G. Clements to recover damages for personal injury sustained by Dennis Koeppel, and *Page 389 the damage to an automobile owned by the Koeppel Kar Ko and operated by Dennis Koeppel, upon colliding with Clements' automobile. Plaintiffs alleged in their complaints that Clements was causally negligent in several respects, and in his answer those allegations were denied. Upon
Alsteen v. Gehlpublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963-11-01 · Published · cited 118× · 21 Wis. 2d 349; 124 N.W.2d 312; 1963 Wisc. LEXIS 372
21 Wis.2d 349 (1963) ALSTEEN, Appellant, v. GEHL and another, Respondents. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 30, 1963. November 1, 1963. *355 For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Edward P. Rudolph of Milwaukee. For the respondents there was a brief by Miles Laubenheimer of Menomonee Fa
Biever v. Szultekpublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948-05-28 · Published · cited 4× · 33 N.W.2d 246; 253 Wis. 134; 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 368
There are two actions by Edward Biever and Esther Biever, plaintiffs, respectively, against John P. Szultek, Olive Hoffman Johnson, and Milwaukee Automobile Insurance Company, Limited Mutual, an insurance corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision. The action was tried to a jury and a special verdict returned on damages only, defendants' liability being conceded. Edward Biever was awarded $1,495.45 damages of which $750 was for pain, suffering,
Wenzel v. Werchpublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949-10-13 · Published · cited 4× · 39 N.W.2d 721; 256 Wis. 47
Five separate actions and numerous cross complaints arising from an automobile accident involving three automobiles were consolidated for trial. Separate judgments were entered. Henry Wenzel and Clarence Wenzel appeal from those parts of the separate judgments dismissing their complaints against the defendants William J. Christman and Milwaukee Auto Insurance Company, Ltd., Mutual. Dwain Werch, by his guardian ad litem, appeals from that part of a judgment dismissing his complaint
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949-06-09 · Published · cited 0× · 38 N.W.2d 492; 255 Wis. 316
Two complaints were filed with the respondent, Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, by the complainant, United Automobile Workers of America, Region No. 9, in July, 1948, charging Gilson Brothers with unfair labor practices. Hereinafter the appellant, Gilson Brothers, will be referred to as the "company" and the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board as the "board." The company filed answers to the *Page 317 complaints and on August 10, 1948, the board c
Schultz v. Broganpublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947-10-13 · Published · cited 19× · 29 N.W.2d 719; 251 Wis. 390; 1947 Wisc. LEXIS 408
These were two actions, each commenced on December 27, 1945. The first action was by Fred B. Schultz, plaintiff, against Charles T. Brogan and AEtna Casualty Surety Company, defendants, to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of a collision between the car of Brogan and a parked automobile owned by Leo Anton Wiedmeyer. Upon motion of defendants, Leo Anton Wiedmeyer and Andrew N. Marx were made parties defendant. The second action was by Lillian Schultz, wife of Fred B.
Roberts v. Robertspublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948-09-15 · Published · cited 0× · 34 N.W.2d 130; 253 Wis. 305; 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 396
* Motion for rehearing denied, with $25 costs, on December 15, 1948. *Page 306 Plaintiff commenced an action for divorce. Upon the defendant's counterclaim the trial court entered judgment of final divorce to the defendant and awarded her the homestead, furnishings, and $75,000 in lieu of alimony out of assets of the plaintiff aggregating $286,697. From that portion of the judgmen
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948-10-12 · Published · cited 5× · 34 N.W.2d 783; 253 Wis. 452; 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 427
The action was brought to determine the value of property of the plaintiff taken by the city of Waukesha after a jury finding that the necessity therefor existed. The jury found such value to be $25,500. From a judgment on the verdict plaintiff appeals. The property of the plaintiff was in the principal business. section of the city of Waukesha. It was plaintiff's contention that immediately prior to the condemnation proceedings, its agent, Mr. Polacheck, had entered into negotiatio
Berlowitz v. Roachpublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947-11-21 · Published · cited 21× · 30 N.W.2d 256; 252 Wis. 61; 1947 Wisc. LEXIS 449
Action commenced July 31, 1947, by Robert D. Berlowitz, an individual doing business under the name and style of Hartford Liquor, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, plaintiff and respondent, against John M. Smith, individually and as state treasurer of the state of Wisconsin, John W. Roach, individually and as chief of the beverage and cigarette tax division of the state treasurer, John E. Martin, individually and as attorney general of the state of Wisconsin, and A.C. Snyder
Mandella v. Statepublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947-10-17 · Published · cited 14× · 29 N.W.2d 723; 251 Wis. 502; 1947 Wisc. LEXIS 409
Prosecutions of John Mandella, Jerome Mandella, Louis M. Fazio, and Dominic Lampone on informations charging each of them on the first count with the crime of murder in the first degree and on a second count with assault with intent to murder. The informations were issued, after their arrest upon complaint made against them, pursuant to which there was a preliminary hearing in the municipal court of Kenosha county, which resulted in each of them being bound over to the circuit court for said
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2008-01-30 · Published · cited 32× · 255 S.W.3d 174; 169 Oil & Gas Rep. 158; 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 614; 2008 WL 227970
255 S.W.3d 174 (2008) Romeo LONGORIA, David Longoria, Roberto Longoria, Miguel Angel Vera, Sylvia Codina Longoria, Humberto Alvarez, Romeo O. Hinojosa, Thelma Longoria Lopez, Alicia M. Longoria McFarlin, Arnaldo Joel Hinojosa, Gloria Lee Vera, Maria L. Segina, José Maria Longoria, Jr., Homero Arturo Longoria, Belia V. Rock, Edna Nora Alvarez Rothwell, Sylvia S. Guerra, Henry J. Longoria, Jesus J. Vera, Rita Sue V. Barrera, Dora Codina Dovalina, Arnoldo L
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1946-09-10 · Published · cited 0× · 24 N.W.2d 624; 249 Wis. 268; 1946 Wisc. LEXIS 323
Action commenced July 30, 1945, by Otto H. Zander and Alyce Zander, husband and wife, plaintiffs and respondents, against Columbus Foods Corporation, a Wisconsin corporation, defendant and appellant, to abate a nuisance and recover damages suffered by the plaintiffs by reason thereof. Defendant answered the complaint and set up two separate counterclaims. Plaintiffs then filed an amended complaint and replied to the counterclaims. Defendant demurred to the amended complaint on several groun
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943-10-12 · Published · cited 8× · 11 N.W.2d 627; 244 Wis. 91; 1943 Wisc. LEXIS 284
This was an action commenced on February 18, 1938, by Ace Engineering Company, plaintiff, against West Bend Malting Company, defendant, to recover a balance due upon the sale of oil burners. Defendant counterclaimed for breach of warranty. The trial was to the court which made and filed findings of fact and conclusions of law and ordered judgment for defendant upon its counterclaim in the sum of $1,127.62. Judgment was entered on February 24, 1943. Plaintiff appeals. The material facts wil
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014-07-16 · Published · cited 55× · 759 F.3d 653; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 1361; 2014 WL 3455308; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13692
SYKES, Circuit Judge. Martin Jonassen kidnapped his 21-year-old daughter E.J. 1 from her home in Missouri and took her to a motel in Indiana, where he held her against her will and sexually assaulted her. On the third day of her captivity, E.J. managed to escape and was seen fleeing naked from the motel, rope still tied
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948-09-15 · Published · cited 8× · 34 N.W.2d 116; 253 Wis. 362; 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 390
The action involves, property damage caused by the collision of two motor-transport trucks. The case was tried to a jury and a verdict rendered in favor of plaintiff. From a judgment entered thereon, the defendant and its insurance carrier appeal. The collision occurred between the automobile-transport truck of the respondent, Magdalene Nimits, and the parked motor transport of the appellant Motor Transport Company. Appellant contends, first, that the trial court erred in refusing to set a
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949-03-09 · Published · cited 0× · 36 N.W.2d 695; 254 Wis. 500; 1949 Wisc. LEXIS 270
Plaintiff commenced an action to recover $931.54 paid to the town of Oconomowoc under an alleged illegal assessment. From an order denying its motion for summary judgment, defendant appeals. Plaintiff is a property owner in Oakdale plat in the defendant township. Oakdale plat is accessible by a private road "J" which connects with County Trunk K. In 1946 the town repaired and resurfaced this private road in response to a petition signed by more than two thirds of the owners of
Herro v. Steidlpublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949-05-04 · Published · cited 11× · 37 N.W.2d 874; 255 Wis. 65; 1949 Wisc. LEXIS 316
Action commenced July 6, 1948, by Alfred A. Herro, as administrator with will annexed of the estate of Abdulla W. Herro, deceased, plaintiff and appellant, against Willard M. Steidl and American Casualty Company, a foreign insurance corporation, defendants and respondents, to recover damages resulting from the death of Abdulla W. Herro on October 12, 1947, from injuries received in an automobile accident. His *Page 66 widow died May 13, 1948. Defendants d
Welch v. Corriganpublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949-05-04 · Published · cited 4× · 38 N.W.2d 148; 255 Wis. 58
The following memorandum was filed September 13, 1949: This case is remanded for a trial de novo. No issue is foreclosed by the decision of the circuit court or by the decision of this court. *Page 65