⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Edward J. Fox”

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2024-03-01 · Published · cited 0×
Dismissed and Opinion Filed March 1, 2024 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00243-CV FIFTEENFORTYSEVEN CRITICAL SYSTEMS REALTY, LLC AND COREY WELP, Appellants V. ARISTA INVESTMENTS, LLC; ARISTA INVESTMENTS 401K TRUST; F. AARON EDWARD; J. MARK EARLEY; AND BRIAN FOX, Appellees
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004-12-22 · Published · cited 7× · 393 F.3d 52; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26796; 2004 WL 2955246
STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge. On the evening of December 21, 2002, during a routine traffic stop, Eric Bergquist (“Bergquist”), a Maine State Trooper, discovered that Appellant Edward J. Fox (“Fox”) possessed, among other things, a shotgun. Fox was arrested and ultimately charged with possession of an unregistered shotgun in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5845(a), 5845(d), 5861(d), and 5871. After the district court denied Fox
Fox v. Hinderliterpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2006-12-27 · Published · cited 15× · 222 S.W.3d 154; 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 11022; 2006 WL 3779819
222 S.W.3d 154 (2006) Edward J. FOX, M.D., Appellant, v. Andrew HINDERLITER and Olga Hinderliter, Appellees. No. 04-06-00430-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. December 27, 2006. *155 Patricia S. Allen, Terri S. Harris, Ewbank & Byrom, P.C., Austin, for appellant. Stephen F. White, Law Office of Stephen F. Whi
Fox v. Foxpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013-04-10 · Published · cited 0× · 113 So. 3d 457; 2013 WL 1442199; 2013 La. App. LEXIS 723
DREW, J. liDr. and Mrs. Fox had an unhappy marriage.1 Dr. Fox (“Michael”) was caught concealing assets, i.e., trying to hide $47,000 cash -with his parents and their corporations. But for a random traffic stop in South Carolina, he would have probably succeeded in defrauding Mrs. Fox (“Harriet”). Michael’s sly plan boomeranged, as the cash was seized by a South Carolina state trooper.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005-11-16 · Published · cited 3× · 429 F.3d 316; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 24599; 2005 WL 3061959
STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendant Edward Fox was convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the District of Maine of possessing an unregistered shotgun. When he originally appeared before us, he challenged that conviction on multiple grounds, alleging police misconduct in conducting the search that revealed his possession of the weapon, complaining of impro
Fox v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-12-04 · Published · cited 0× · 259 So. 3d 109
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Fox v. Loews Corp.public domain
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018-04-13 · Published · cited 8× · 309 F. Supp. 3d 1241
CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendants, Loews Corporation; Loews Hotels Holding Corporation ("LHHC"); MB Redevelopment, LLC ("MB"); and Loews Miami Beach Hotel Operating Company, Inc.'s ("LMBHOC['s]") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [ECF No. 34], filed February 23, 2018. Defendants move to dismiss the Amended Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12
Fox v. McCormickpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-12-09 · Published · cited 4× · 20 F. Supp. 3d 133; 58 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1174; 2013 WL 6439128; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172557
OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Court The question presented is whether employee-participants in a multiemployer, de-fíned-benefít, pension plan have standing to sue plan trustees for breach of their fiduciary duty to collect contributions from long-delinquent employers. Plaintiff-employees here contend that collection of allegedly overdue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-05-15 · Published · cited 651× · 890 F.3d 634
Rovner, Circuit Judge. *639 One man's extradition is another man's "kidnapping." Edward Tobey, the plaintiff here, has three state-court convictions (one in Illinois and two in Florida) for possession of child pornography. Tobey also has a penchant for resisting the conditions of probation p
Fox v. Picardpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-03-26 · Published · cited 36× · 848 F. Supp. 2d 469
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: These consolidated bankruptcy appeals arise out of the multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme orchestrated by Bernard L. Ma-doff (“Madoff’), and the subsequent bankruptcy of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”) in the wake of the public revelation of that scheme. The appellants Adele Fox and Susanne Stone Marshall (collectively, the “
Fox v. Patersonpublic domain
District Court, W.D. New York · 2010-06-04 · Published · cited 5× · 715 F. Supp. 2d 431; 62 A.L.R. 6th 661; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55263; 2010 WL 2222446
715 F.Supp.2d 431 (2010) Larry S. FOX, Cynthia Alford, Carl Edwards, Plaintiffs, v. David A. PATERSON, Governor of New York, Defendant. No. 10-CV-6240L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. June 4, 2010. *432 John A. Cirando, D.J. & J.A. Cirando, Esqs., Syracuse, NY, for Plaintiffs. Debra A. Martin, Gary M. Lev
Fox v. Hayespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010-04-07 · Published · cited 182× · 600 F.3d 819; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7154; 2010 WL 1337738
600 F.3d 819 (2010) Kevin FOX and Melissa Fox, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Edward HAYES, Michael Guilfoyle, Scott Swearengen, Brad Wachtl, and Will County, Defendants-Appellants, v. American Alternative Insurance Corporation and Essex Insurance Company, Intervenors-Appellants. No. 08-3736. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 9, 2009.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000-01-13 · Published · cited 28× · 201 F.3d 526; 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 828; 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2257; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 425
201 F.3d 526 (4th Cir. 2000) EDWARD F. FOX; THOMAS L. GRIMES; JAMES HORNER; EDWARD KOLUCH; JOSEPH KUNDRAT; VINCENT C. MOULTER; GARY RAUB; CHARLES RUMMEL; HERBERT HEWLETT; BARRY WOOD; WILLIAM HELMICK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and LAWRENCE AMES; THOMAS BULL; TERRY CAUDELL; JOSEPH CONWAY; FREDERICK J. DILLON; RONALD EKLUND; RONALD KENNEDY; JAMES KIRKPATRICK; GEORGE LEICHLING; MARK LINDSAY; JOHN F. X.O'BRIEN; JOSEPH WASHINGTON PETERS; DAVID PHIPPS;
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016-12-06 · Published · cited 0× · 505 S.W.3d 414; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1256
*415Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge Introduction Vicki Lynn Street (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Edward and Mary Lou Harris (Respondents) on Appellant’s suit for premises liability and negligence stemming from an incident in which Respondents’ dog knocked Appellant over, causing injuries. Because we find that Responde
In Re Foxpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2002-03-06 · Published · cited 1× · 274 B.R. 909; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 151; 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 270; 2002 WL 452106
274 B.R. 909 (2002) In re Bruce Edward FOX and Karin Miller Fox, Debtors. No. 02-00966-3P3. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. March 6, 2002. J. Herbert Williams, Ocala, FL, for debtors. Mamie L. Davis, Jacksonville, FL, trustee. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Bankruptcy Judg
Vega v. Foxpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2006-02-21 · Published · cited 13× · 457 F. Supp. 2d 172; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6747; 2006 WL 397941
457 F.Supp.2d 172 (2006) Felix VEGA, Plaintiff, v. Larry FOX, individually, and as a caseworker with YASL (Young Adult Supportive Living Program) of August Aichhorn Center for Adult Residential Care, Inc.; Paul Green, individually, and as Site Supervisor with YASL of the August Aichhorn Center for Adult Residential Care, Inc.; Mr. "John" Washington, individually, and as caseworker with YASL of the August Aichhorn Center for Adult Residential Care
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017-09-19 · Published · cited 28× · 277 F. Supp. 3d 1301
ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAG4, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendants, Confederación Sudamericana de Fútbol (“Conmebol”), Fuji Play Group, S.A., and Alejandro Burzaco’s Consolidated Jurisdictional Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 203] Plaintiffs, GolTV, Inc. and Global Sports Partners LLP’s Amended Complaint [ECF No. 78]. The Court has carefully considered the Amended Complaint,
King v. Foxpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002-01-29 · Published · cited 5× · 28 F. App'x 95
SUMMARY ORDER AFTER ARGUMENT AND UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is VACATED and REMANDED for further proceedings. Plaintiff Edward C. King appeals from the District Court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant Lawrence A. Fox dated March 9, 1999. Judgment was entered March 11, 1999, and this appeal followed.
District Court, D. Maryland · 2002-10-21 · Published · cited 0× · 224 F. Supp. 2d 1039; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20434; 2002 WL 31395267
224 F.Supp.2d 1039 (2002) Robert W. FOX and Jane L. Fox, Plaintiffs v. BALTIMORE COUNTY, MD, Defendant No. CIV. AMD 02-3074. United States District Court, D. Maryland. October 21, 2002. Guy M. Craig, Rollins Smalkin Richards and Mackie LLC, Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiffs. Robert W. Fox, Towson, MD, Pro se. Edward J. Gilliss, Baltimore County Office of L
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986-06-20 · Published · cited 32× · 794 F.2d 34; 5 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 228; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26441
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: An action instituted by John J. Fox, an attorney, against Alfred G. Boucher, a layman, was dismissed on June 11, 1985 by an order in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sweet, J.) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 sanctions in the amount of $4,000 were assessed against the plaintiff. The