⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Edward H English and Joyce M English”

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2005-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
Kentucky Supreme Court · 1996-05-23 · Published · cited 27× · 926 S.W.2d 449; 1996 Ky. LEXIS 43; 1996 WL 277906
926 S.W.2d 449 (1996) Hon. John W. POTTER, Judge, Jefferson Circuit Court, Appellant, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Dista Products Company, Joyce Fentress, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Kenneth Fentress, Roma Jean Barger, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Richard Owen Barger, Sr., Angela Bowman, Douglas Bowman, Michael P. Campbell, Forrest Conrad, Saundra Conrad, Linda Ganote, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009-07-30 · Published · cited 6× · 655 F. Supp. 2d 1270; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70491; 2009 WL 2355747
655 F.Supp.2d 1270 (2009) SOUTHEAST LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BAYER CORPORATION, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical, Inc., Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Bayer Healthcare, A.G., Defendants. This Order relates to Case No. 08-80873. Case No. 08-1928-MD. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. July 30, 2009
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023-08-08 · Published · cited 4× · 77 F.4th 391
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0168p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ M. KATHLEEN MCKINNEY, Regional Director of │ Region 15 of the Natio
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013-09-24 · Published · cited 6× · 974 F. Supp. 2d 879; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136726; 2013 WL 5356880
ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment (DE 21). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), United States Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. entered a memorandum and recommendation (“M & R”) wherein it is recommended that the court grant defendants’ motion. Plaintiff filed objecti
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-02-13 · Published · cited 72× · 742 F.3d 1144; 2014 WL 555862; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 2786
OPINION O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We are called upon to decide whether a responsible, law-abiding citizen has a right under the Second Amendment to carry a firearm in public for self-defense. I A California generally prohibits the open or concealed carriage of a handgun, whether loaded or unloaded, in public locations.1
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-10-26 · Published · cited 9× · 227 N.E.3d 389; 2023 Ohio 3908
[Cite as Francisco A. Mateo M.D., Inc. v. Proia, 2023-Ohio-3908.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY FRANCISCO A. MATEO MD, INC. et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees/ Cross-Appellant, v. NICHOL
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEPHEN M. SCIANNELLA, individually ) and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0125-PAF ) ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, ) ASTRAZ
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEPHEN M. SCIANNELLA, individually ) and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0125-PAF ) ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, ) ASTRAZ
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023-04-19 · Published · cited 0× · 325 Or. App. 381; 528 P.3d 1180
381 Argued and submitted September 26, 2022, appeal dismissed as moot April 19, 2023 James R. HARGREAVES, in behalf of Angelica Cece Maki, Ruth Diane Lewis, Charles Edward Evans, Marissa Pugh, and Anthony Carey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dolores MATTEUCCI, in her official capa
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-09-28 · Published · cited 0× · 342 F. Supp. 3d 32
B. Alleging Fraud Complaints brought under the False Claims Act must comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b). United States ex rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp. , 286 F.3d 542, 551-52 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Rule 9(b) requires that a "party state with particularity the circumst
Texas Supreme Court · 2016-05-13 · Published · cited 54× · 490 S.W.3d 826; 59 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 771; 2016 WL 2853868; 2016 Tex. LEXIS 374
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 14-0776 444444444444 MIKE MORATH, COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; GLENN HEGAR, TEXAS COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY ; THE TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ; AND THE TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, APPELLANTS,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-01-11 · Published · cited 4× · 90 F.4th 975
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS; No. 23-15087 TORO CASTANO; SARAH CRONK; JOSHUA DONOHOE; MOLIQUE D.C. No. FRANK; DAVID MARTINEZ; 4:22-cv-05502- TERESA SANDOVAL; DMR NATHANIEL VAUGHN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCI
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-08-11 · Published · cited 65× · 271 F.R.D. 13; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83247; 2010 WL 3322639
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MICHAEL H. DOLINGER, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff R.F.M.A.S., Inc. (“RFMAS” or “plaintiff’) commenced this action against Ms. Mimi So and Mimi So International, Ine. (collectively, “the Mimi So defendants” or “Mimi So”) and Richemont SA, Compag-nie Financiere Richemont SA, Richemont North America, Inc., Richemont Holdings I, Inc., and Richemont International, Ltd.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2016-02-11 · Published · cited 2× · 546 B.R. 549; 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 497
MEMORANDUM2 BY: KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE On January 23, 2012, Evergreen Energy, Inc. (“Evergreen”) and related entities filed chapter 7 bankruptcy petitions in this Court. The chapter 7 trustee, Charles A. Stanziale, Jr., (the “Trustee”) filed a 15 count adversary complaint against former director Ilyas Tariq Khan (“Khan”) and entities that he owned or contr
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2020-07-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT AARON M. MALIN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) WD83322 ) MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF ) Opinion filed: July 21, 2020 COMMUNITY TASK FORCES, d/b/a ) ACT MISSOURI,
Gutierrez v. Noothpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015-12-09 · Published · cited 0× · 275 Or. App. 171; 364 P.3d 725; 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 1488
ARMSTRONG, P. J. Petitioner was convicted of attempted first-degree rape, three counts of first-degree sexual abuse, and two counts of attempted aggravated murder. He subsequently sought post-conviction relief, contending that his trial counsel in the criminal case had provided him with constitutionally inadequate representation by failing to move to suppress evidence that he asserts that the state had obtained in violation of
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999-08-02 · Published · cited 3× · 736 A.2d 612; 1999 Pa. Super. 192; 1999 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2350
736 A.2d 612 (1999) Delores EDWARDS, Appellant, v. GERMANTOWN HOSPITAL and Meena v. Phatak, M.D. Appellees. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 19, 1999. Filed August 2, 1999. *613 Rudolph J. Di Massa, Philadelphia, for appellant. Lynn F. Reutelhuber, Harrisburg, for Germantown Hospital, appellee. Pau
Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-05-26 · Published · cited 316× · 179 L. Ed. 2d 1118; 131 S. Ct. 2020; 563 U.S. 692; 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4016
Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Breyer joins, concurring in the judgment. I agree with the Court’s conclusion that this case is moot and that vacatur is the appropriate disposition; unlike the majority, however, I would go no further. As the exchange *715between the majority and Justice Kennedy demonstrates, the question whether Camreta, as a pre
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972-10-05 · Published · cited 146× · 466 F.2d 1059
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge: Bursey and Presley, who are members of the staff of The Black Panther newspaper, were held in contempt when they refused to answer certain questions propounded by a federal grand jury. Throughout the grand jury proceedings and the proceedings before the district court, the witnesses consistently asserted the First and Fifth Amendments as the