Cases

RYAN, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, Edward G. Alien, appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Allen challenges the sufficiency of the evidence of his sanity and the jury instructions regarding the sanity issue. The district court held, and we agree, that Allen is precluded from challenging the sufficiency

LANSING, Judge. Mark Edward Allen, III, appeals from the denial of a motion filed in his criminal case five months after the judgment of conviction was entered. Allen asserts that the district court erred by not treating the motion as a petition for post-conviction relief. I. BACKGROUND Allen pleaded guil

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

GILMAN, Circuit Judge: *731 Almus Taylor died from internal bleeding after being kept in a jail holding cell overnight. Bonny Edward Taylor, Almus's father and the Administrator of Almus's estate, sued the jail guards under

C. Johnson, J. ¶1 Petitioner Bryan Allen challenges his felony harassment conviction, raising three issues. The primary issue involves whether the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the potential fallibility of cross-racial eyewitness identification. Based on the facts of this case, Allen cannot show the trial court violated his constitutional rights by refusing to give the cautionary instruction. A second issue in

SECTION: “H”(D ORDER AND REASONS JANE TRICHE MILAZZO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment on the issue of the classification of Plaintiffs (Docs. 67, 78), on the issue of the application of the fluctuating work week method (Docs. 68, 80), and on the issue of bonus offsets (Docs. 66, 73). In addition, this Court considers Plaintiffs Motion in Li

Houghton, J. ¶35 (concurring) — I concur but write separately to explain my departure from my agreement with State v. Madrid, 145 Wn. App. 106, 192 P.3d 909 (2008) . As the majority notes, “[D]ifferent panels of our court have held that former RCW 26.50.110(1) [(2006)] is unambiguous and that a no-contact order violation is not a criminal offense unless the violation was one for which an arrest is required under RCW

•, ' RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMIN.A.L APPEAl S NOV 09 2015

319 F.3d 878 Leonard J. TREJO, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Edward J. SHOBEN, Jessie G. Delia, Larry R. Faulkner, Louis F. Fitzgerald, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-3341. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 26, 2002. Decided January 30, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Robert

OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: In October of 2010, officers with the San Diego Police Department responded to a *1228 report that two armed black males had been seen in the parking lot of an apartment complex. When they arrived, the officers, armed with assault rifles

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS November 14, 2014 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS EDWARD G. SMITH,

RICH, Circuit Judge, with whom: as to Part I (Jurisdiction): PAULINE NEWMAN, LOURIE and RADER, Circuit Judges, join; ARCHER, Chief Judge, NIES and PLAGER, Circuit Judges, concur in conclusion; and MAYER, MICHEL, CLEVENGER and SCHALL, Circuit Judges, dissent; and as to Part II (Merits): PAULINE NEWMAN, LOURIE, MICHEL, PLAGER and RADER, Circuit Judges, join; ARCHER, Chief Judge, and NIES, Circuit Judge, dissent; and MAYER, CLEVENGER and SCHALL, Circui

ORDER LEGROME D. DAVIS, District Judge. AND NOW, this 5th day of November 2007, upon consideration of Plaintiff Allen’s Motion for Consolidation and Appointment of Interim Class Counsel (Civil Action 06-cv-2426, Doc. No. 32) and Plaintiff Heath’s Renewed Motion for Appointment of Interim Class Counsel (Civil Action 06-cv-4534, Doc. No. 28), it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff Allen’s Motion is

NO. 12-14-00129-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JEFFREY EDWARD ALLEN, § APPEAL FROM THE 3RD APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

PER CURIAM. Edward Allen Covington appeals his convictions and death sentences for the first-degree murders of Lisa, Zachary, and Heather Savannah Freiberg. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons we explain, we affirm the convictions and sentences. I. BACKGROUND In May 2008, Lisa Freiberg lived i

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Jun 16 2016, 10:29 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals court except for the

69 S.W.3d 181 (2002) STATE of Tennessee v. Walter Lee ALLEN. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville. February 22, 2002. *184 Edward C. Miller and Helen Susanne Bales, Dandridge, Tennessee, for the appellant, Walter Lee Allen. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; Elizabeth T. Ryan, Assistant

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed as to National Union Insurance Company and Federal Insurance Company on the authority of Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003-Ohio-5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court in favor of Consolidated Insurance Company and Indiana Insurance Company is reinstated on the authority of

ORDER RALPH G. THOMPSON, Chief Judge. Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment filed May 18, 1987, by defendant James E. Frick, Inc. (Frick). This case is one of several filed by employees of T. G. & Y. Stores, Co. (TG & Y) following an investigation of theft and illegal substance use at TG & Y’s Oklahoma warehouses. Frick is a Missouri corporation which, on April 1,

285 S.W.3d 777 (2009) Phillip J. BEHNEN, Appellant, v. A.G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC., Respondent. No. ED 91683. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. May 5, 2009. *778 Joe D. Jacobson, Allen P. Press, James Simeri, Clayton, MO, for appellant. Jeffrey J. Kalinowski, Carrie J. Bechtold, Eric D. Martin,