Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-3232 ___________________________ Oakley Bernard Engesser Plaintiff – Appellant v. Trooper Edward Fox, of the South Dakota Highway Patrol, in his individual capacity; Micha

AMY, Judge. liThe defendant was charged with second degree murder in connection with the death of Mychel Cleaver. A jury found the defendant guilty of manslaughter, and the trial court sentenced the defendant to forty years at hard labor with credit for time served. The defendant appeals. For the following reasons, we affirm, with instructions. Factual and Procedural Background The body

Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. B, No, 7277-13; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 15-692 [ tDenied.

Stegall, J.: Edward and Veronia Fox were married in Germany on December 22,1979. At that time, Edward Fox was a serviceman with the United States Army stationed in Germany and Veronia Fox was a German citizen. Approximately 17 years into the marriage, Edward Fox retired from the United States Army and began employment with the United States Civil Service. During the entirety of the m

DREW, J. liDr. and Mrs. Fox had an unhappy marriage.1 Dr. Fox (“Michael”) was caught concealing assets, i.e., trying to hide $47,000 cash -with his parents and their corporations. But for a random traffic stop in South Carolina, he would have probably succeeded in defrauding Mrs. Fox (“Harriet”). Michael’s sly plan boomeranged, as the cash was seized by a South Carolina state trooper.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 32.

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW UPON THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR ABUSE ROBERT A. GORDON, Bankruptcy Judge. Upon consideration of the evidence and arguments presented in support of and in opposition to the United States Trustee’s Motion to Dismiss for Abuse, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: PROCEDURAL HIS

CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendants, Loews Corporation; Loews Hotels Holding Corporation ("LHHC"); MB Redevelopment, LLC ("MB"); and Loews Miami Beach Hotel Operating Company, Inc.'s ("LMBHOC['s]") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [ECF No. 34], filed February 23, 2018. Defendants move to dismiss the Amended Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12

COMBS, Y.C.J.: FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 1 The focus of this appeal concerns the validity of HB 2630; 2014 Okla. Sess. Laws c. 375 (effective November 1, 2014). 1 HB 2630 created the Retirement Freedom Act (74 O.S. Supp. 2014, § 935.1 et seq.). The main purpose of HB 2630 was to create a new

HILL, Justice. [¶1] A jury convicted James Rogers of first-degree sexual assault and two counts of third-degree sexual abuse of a minor. Mr. Rogers qualified as a habitual criminal and was thus sentenced to life in prison on the first-degree sexual assault conviction. He received thirteen- to fifteen-year sentences on the remaining two charges to be served concurrently to each oth

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Court The question presented is whether employee-participants in a multiemployer, de-fíned-benefít, pension plan have standing to sue plan trustees for breach of their fiduciary duty to collect contributions from long-delinquent employers. Plaintiff-employees here contend that collection of allegedly overdue

274 B.R. 909 (2002) In re Bruce Edward FOX and Karin Miller Fox, Debtors. No. 02-00966-3P3. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. March 6, 2002. J. Herbert Williams, Ocala, FL, for debtors. Mamie L. Davis, Jacksonville, FL, trustee. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Bankruptcy Judg

CHARLES C. LOVELL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties. Having examined the entire record, the Court is prepared to rule. I. BACKGROUND This is a declaratory judgment action claiming violation of Plaintiffs' civil rights, 42 U

28 So.3d 1143 (2009) Peggy T. GEREIGHTY Wife of/and Tavis Domingue v. Carla FOX, Syndistar, Inc., Educational Publishers and General Insurance Company of America. No. 09-CA-395. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. November 24, 2009. *1144 Andrew W. Eversberg, Attorney at Law, Baton Rouge, LA, for Appellants, Carla Fox an

MUKASEY, District Judge. Edward King appeals from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment to his former attorney Lawrence Pox in a dispute over Fox’s fees. See King v. Fox, No. 97 Civ. 4134, 2004 WL 68397, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 462 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2004). King argues that the District Court erroneously dismissed his collateral estop-pel claim, that t

Rovner, Circuit Judge. *639 One man's extradition is another man's "kidnapping." Edward Tobey, the plaintiff here, has three state-court convictions (one in Illinois and two in Florida) for possession of child pornography. Tobey also has a penchant for resisting the conditions of probation p

DAVIS, Justice. [¶1] Appellant Edward Barrowes challenges his conviction of aggravated vehicular homicide as defined by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-106(b)(ii) (LexisNexis 2015). He claims the evidence presented by the State was insufficient to establish that he drove in a reckless manner. We affirm. ISSUES [¶2] Was the evidence suf

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: These consolidated bankruptcy appeals arise out of the multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme orchestrated by Bernard L. Ma-doff (“Madoff’), and the subsequent bankruptcy of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”) in the wake of the public revelation of that scheme. The appellants Adele Fox and Susanne Stone Marshall (collectively, the “

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 5, 2012 Decided June 12, 2012 No. 11-5010 KENNETH R. FOX, APPELLANT v. HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, SECRETARY OF STATE, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:10-cv-0