Cases

Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #057 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 19th day of October, 2016, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2016-B -0456 IN RE: EDWARD BISSAU MENDY Upon review of the findings and recommendations of the hearing committee and disciplinary board, and considering the record, the

OPINION JIM R. WRIGHT, Chief Justice. Because, in this declaratory judgment action, there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether T.N. Wells and Vicki Wells were bona fide purchasers of a mineral interest, the trial court erred when it granted the Wellses’ motion for summary judgment. For reasons stated in this opinion, the trial court did not

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT Michael G. Williamson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge To prevail on a claim under Bankruptcy Code § 523(a)(6), a creditor must prove that the debtor deliberately and intentionally injured him by a willful and malicious act. Here, Michael Perry, who had a $2.8 million claim against Wallace Clark, one of the Debtors in this case, alleges that Clark del

Opinion filed November 30, 2012 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-11-00128-CV __________ NEIL EDWARD RICHMOND, MARY RICHMOND CLARK, AND JAMES B. RICHMOND, Appellants V. T.N. WELLS AND VICKI WELLS, Appellees

558 S.E.2d 620 (2001) 210 W.Va. 621 In re EDWARD B., John David F., David Dewane F., George Franklin F., and Benny Jay J. No. 28732. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 18, 2001. Decided November 8, 2001. *624 Lisa Davis Clark, Gibson, Lefler & Associates, Princeton,

HASELTON, C. J. Defendant appeals a monetary judgment against him for the intentional torts of sexual battery of a child and intentional infliction of severe emotional distress. Defendant contends, inter alia, that (1) the trial court erred in allowing plaintiff’s two expert witnesses to provide opinion testimony regarding plaintiff’s credibility and (2) the admission of the experts’ diagnoses that plaintiff had been se

405 B.R. 457 (2009) In re John F. CLARK and Dorothy M. Clark, Debtors. No. 08-53620. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. May 20, 2009. *458 Edward J. Gudeman, Royal Oak, MI, for Debtor. Opinion and Order Regarding Application For Compensation Filed By the Debtors' Attorney STEV

KELLEY, Judge. By letter dated August 17, 1990, Sergeant Edward Clark was removed by the Department of Corrections from his employment as a Corrections Officer II at the State Correctional Institution at Graterford (SCIG) for allegedly using excessive force against an inmate. Clark appealed to the State Civil Service Commission which sustained the department’s action. In an unreported opinion filed June 17, 1992, this cour

244 P.3d 1052 (2010) 2010 WY 168 Dave T. HELM and Van E. Helm, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. Ken CLARK, Trustee, or his successor in trust, under the Ken Clark Living Trust dated March 28, 2006, Appellee (Defendant). No. S-10-0002. Supreme Court of Wyoming. December 21, 2010. *1055 Representing Appellants: J

330 B.R. 702 (2005) In Re Jerald Edward CLARK, Debtor. Lalit Sinha and Daphne Sinha, Plaintiff, v. Jerald Edward Clark, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 04-74826, Adversary No. 05-7009. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois. October 3, 2005. *703 *704 *705

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BUCKLEY. BUCKLEY, Circuit Judge. Edward Clark Jr. appeals his conviction for drug possession on the ground that the district court improperly denied his motion to suppress cocaine base discovered in his car. He argues that this evidence should have been excluded because the police did not have reasonable suspi

ERVIN, Judge. I. Factual Background On 11 May 2005, Janet Clark (Ms. Clark) was involved in a serious motor vehicle accident. Ms. Clark sustained a broken knee and a traumatic brain injury, remained comatose for two and a half weeks, spent two months as an inpatient at WakeMed Hospital, and required months of additional rehabilitation. Prior to her injury, Ms. Clark had a history of substance abuse and ment

Cornelia A. Clark, J. This direct appeal arises from a disciplinary proceeding against a Knoxville attorney. A hearing panel ("Hearing Panel") of the Board of Professional Responsibility ("Board") found that the attorney had violated Rule 8.4(b) and (c) of the Tennessee Rules of Professional Conduct ("RPC") by misappropriating funds from his law partnership in a manner intended to conce

21 So.3d 509 (2009) Nina PRICE, Individually and on Behalf of All Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Albert B. Price, Jr., Deceased v. Steven CLARK, M.D., Samuel Duff Austin, M.D., Bennie Barnette Wright, Jr., M.D., Estate of Barry Stephen Sullivan, M.D., Cleveland Medical Alliance, LLP, Cleveland Medical Clinic, PLLC, Cleveland Medical Clinic, LTD and Cleveland Clinic, P.A. No. 2007-CA-01671-SCT. Supreme

658 S.E.2d 190 (2008) CLARK v. The STATE. Clark v. The State. Nos. A07A1817, A07A2125. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 14, 2008. *191 David P. Smith, for appellant (case no. A07A1817). Frederick M. Scherma, for appellant (case no. A07A2125). Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, John R. Edwards, Ann

Dissenting Opinion of ACOBA, J. I agree with the determination of the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit (the court) that the subject Charter Amendment (Amendment) should be prospectively applied with the first term of the four-term limit to begin following the election subsequent to the adoption of the Amendment. Term limits provisions not in existence but only ratified by voters in the same general election i

737 F.Supp.2d 239 (2010) Raul CLARK, Bruce Clark, and Iraida Clark, Plaintiffs, v. Michael T. CONAHAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-2535. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. August 25, 2010. *248 Bridget E. Montgomery, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, David J. Schertz, Harrisburg, PA, Michael

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Raphael, White and Senior Judge Petty PUBLISHED Argued at Richmond, Virginia THOMAS EDWARD CLARK OPINION BY v. Record No. 0620-22-2 JUDGE WILLIAM G. PETTY OCTOBER

101 F.Supp.2d 468 (2000) Carl GARDNER, Plaintiff, v. Dick CLARK d/b/a Dick Clark Productions, Olive Enterprises, Inc., and The Robinson Property Group, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:99cv84-D-B United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division. May 30, 2000. *469 Gerard F. Dunne, New York City, for plaintiff.

OPINION JANICE M. HOLDER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., and CORNELIA A. CLARK, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ„ joined. A law firm filed suit against a former partner and a former paralegal. Both former employees filed motions to compel arbitration. The