Cases

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ANEW VENTURES II, LLC, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. 2025-0774 MAA v. ) ) ) TERRA GLOBAL

*908 ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION ■ ■ TO DISMISS DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Michael J. Tracey (“Defendant”). (Dkt. # 12.) On April 9, 2015, the Court heard oral argument on the Motion. Andrew J. Moon, Esq., and Nathaniel C. Corb

*543 OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: This is the second opinion stemming from the restructuring of the debt of Education Management Corporation, Education Management L.L.C., and Education Management Finance Corporation (collectively, “EDMC” or “Defendants”). Defendants, in negotiations with the Steering Committee fo

STRAUB, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The question before this Court is whether Section 316(b) of the Trust Indenture Act (the “TIA”) prohibits Defendant-appellant Education Management Corporation (“EDMC”) from engaging in an out-of-court restructuring that is collusively engineered to ensure that certain minority bondholders receive no payment on their notes, despite the fact that the terms of the indenture governin

March 31, 2023 Supreme Court Petrolex II LLC, as assignee of : Jesmac, Inc. v. : No. 2022-10-Appeal. (PM 19-10036) The Bailey Group LLC et al. : Petrolex II LLC, as assignee of : Commercial Painting, Inc. v. : No. 2022-11-Appeal.

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT GFS, II, LLC, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) WD86185 ) JANELLE CARSON, ) Filed: December 12, 2023 ) Resp

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: Plaintiffs Marblegate Asset Management, LLC, Marblegate Special Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. (together “Mar-blegate”), Magnolia Road Capital LP, and Magnolia Road Global Credit Master Fund L.P. (together “Magnolia,” and with Mar-blegate “Plaintiffs”) hold unsecured debt in Defendant Education Management LLC, which along with De

JERRY C. OLDSHUE, JR., U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE *66This matter came before the Court for a hearing on June 28, 2019, on Creditor BGVM Finance III, LLC's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Relief from Stay (collectively "the Motions") (Docs. 35, 36) and Debtor's Response in Opposition thereto. (Docs. 45, 46). Appearances were as noted on the record.

HELEN ZIEGLER BENJAMIN, TRUSTEE v. ISLAND MANAGEMENT, LLC (SC 20501) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to the provision (§ 34-255i (b) (2)) of the Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Company Act describing the conditions under which a member of a manager-managed limited liability company is permitted to inspect the

CENTRIX MANAGEMENT CO., LLC v. DONALD W. FOSBERG (SC 20927) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Alexander and Dannehy, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to statute (§ 42-150bb), when a consumer contract or lease includes a unilateral attorney’s fees provision benefiting the commercial party, a prevailing consumer is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees, the size

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1788 Filed February 19, 2025 JACOB M. ROSE, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Jack F. Rose and JEREMY P. ROSE, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. OAKLAND HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLC, d/b/a OAKLAND MANOR, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Pott

Weston, J. (dissenting and voting to affirm the order in the following memorandum). After multiple, unsuccessful attempts to resuscitate her argument that the subject apartment was rent stabilized, and after entering into a binding stipulation of settlement with the benefit of counsel, tenant sought to vacate the stipulation, claiming that landlord’s prepayment of the mortgage did not subject tenant’s apartment to the Housing Assis

OPINION CONTI, Chief Judge. I. Introduction On October 8, 2013, plaintiff Jennifer Masoner (“plaintiff” or “Masoner”) filed a three-count complaint against her employer, Education Management Corporation (“defendant” or “EDMC”), alleging sex discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (count I), retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3 (count II), and retaliation in

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2024 ME 27 Docket: Cum-23-249 Argued: February 7, 2024 Decided: April 18, 2024 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. TIFFANY VARGAS et al. v. RIVERBEND MANAGEMENT LLC HORTON, J. [¶1] We are called to consider the standard gov

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On February 19, 2014, the Plaintiffs Schwartzco Enterprises, LLC (“Schwartzco”), a New York limited liability company; the Meat House — Roslyn LLC (“TMH Roslyn”), a New York limited liability company; and Arnold M. Schwartz, an individual resident of New *338York (collectively the “Plaintiffs”

*982 In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Elliot, J.), entered April 25, 2014, as granted those branches of the defendants’ cross motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action alle

HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR., Chief Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Sherielee Figueroa brings this action for sexual harassment and retaliation against Defendants KK Sub II, LLC, John Pharo, and Jennifer Hammel1 pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1784 FORTY SIX HUNDRED LLC, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. CADENCE EDUCATION, LLC, d/b/a NEXT GENERATION CHILDREN'S CENTERS, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Tim

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and