Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “Eduardo Zepeda Flores”
Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolfpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CRISTA RAMOS; CRISTINA MORALES; No. 18-16981 BENJAMIN ZEPEDA; ORLANDO ZEPEDA; JUAN EDUA
Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolfpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CRISTA RAMOS; CRISTINA MORALES; No. 18-16981 BENJAMIN ZEPEDA; ORLANDO ZEPEDA; JUAN EDUARDO AYALA D.C. No. FLORES; ELSY YOLANDA FLORES DE 3:18-cv-01554- AYALA; MARIA JOSE AYALA FLORES; EMC HNAIDA CENEMAT; WILNA DESTIN; RILYA SALARY; SHERIKA BLANC; IMARA AMPIE; MAZIN AHMED; OPINION HIWAIDA ELARABI, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolfpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CRISTA RAMOS; CRISTINA MORALES; No. 18-16981 BENJAMIN ZEPEDA; ORLANDO ZEPEDA; JUAN EDUARDO AYALA D.C. No. FLORES; ELSY YOLANDA FLORES DE 3:18-cv-01554- AYALA; MARIA JOSE AYALA FLORES; EMC HNAIDA CENEMAT; WILNA DESTIN; RILYA SALARY; SHERIKA BLANC; IMARA AMPIE; MAZIN AHMED; OPINION HIWAIDA ELARABI, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Diaz v. Immigration & Naturalization Servicepublic domain
648 F.Supp. 638 (1986) Jose Fernando DIAZ, et al., and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Department of Justice, United States of America, David Ilchert, District Director of the San Francisco District of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Alan Nelson, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, and Edwin Meese, Attorney General, Defendants.
Wieland v. Assaf (In re Briones-Coroy)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIDNEY B. BROOKS, Bankruptcy Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .690 II. Summary.691 A. A Summary of this Opinion.691 B. The Enactment of 11 U.S.C. § 110 in the Reform Act of 1994 .692 C. The 2005 Amendments .693 D. The Unintended Consequences of 11 U.S.C. § 110.694
Anderson v. United Statespublic domain
MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a putative class of over 300 former sailors, appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of their challenges to the Navy’s implementation of an Enlisted Retention Board (ERB) that resulted in their honorable discharges. We affirm. Background In a March 20
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Orantes-Hernandez v. Smithpublic domain
541 F.Supp. 351 (1982) Crosby Wilfredo ORANTES-HERNANDEZ; Organizacion De Profesionales Y Tecnicos Salvadorenos, Casa El Salvador-Farabundo Marti; Salvadoran American Professional Association; Concilio Manzo; Central American Refugee Program; El Rescate; Marta Ester Paniagua-Vides; Jose Sanchez Flores; Dora Alicia Ayala De Castillo; Adelso Salome Flores; Uvaldo Aguilar; Dora Elia Estrada; Juan Francisco Perez-Cruz; Jose Adilman Barahona; Ana Estela Gueva