Cases

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Beales, Athey and Callins Argued at Arlington, Virginia EDUARDO UGARTE, II OPINION BY v. Record No. 1096-23-4 JUDGE RANDOLPH A. BEALES MARCH 11, 2025

Motion for En Banc Reconsideration Failed and Dissenting Opinion from Failure of Motion for En Banc Reconsideration filed June 27, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00338-CV OSCAR PARDO AND RICARDO EDUARDO PEREZ, Appellants V. RAFAEL IGLESIAS III, Appellee On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Affirmed; Opinion Filed June 23, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01140-CR No. 05-14-01141-CR GABRIEL EDUARDO RAMIREZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Ap

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EDUARDO ALVARADO § CHAVERRI, et al., § No. 519, 2019 § Plaintiffs Below, § Court Below: Superior Court of Appellants, § the State of Delaware § v. § C.A. No. N12C-06-017 § DOLE FOOD

MEMORANDUM OPINION Sue L. Robinson, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (“IV”) filed suit against Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba Corporation (“Toshiba”) on March 20, 2013 alleging that various Toshiba products (collecti

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS EDUARDO LERMA, Appellant, v. STEWART FORBES, Appellee. <

469 F.Supp.2d 793 (2006) Douglas E. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. CV-06-53-PHX-DGC. United States District Court, D. Arizona. December 11, 2006. *794 Eric Glenn Slepian, Slepian Law Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff. Michael A. Johns, U.S. A

FEINBERG, Senior Circuit Judge: Lazaro Perez Redondo (Perez) and Eduardo Robinson Munoz (Robinson) appeal from judgments of conviction for aiding and abetting the possession, with intent to distribute, of marijuana aboard a vessel, 46 U.S.C.App. § 1903(a), (c)(1)(A) & 18 U.S.C. § 2, after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, Jose

NUMBER 13-09-00195-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG CHARLES ANTHONY CUEVA II, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Circuit Judge: Appellant Eduardo Ortez appeals from the District Court’s ruling sentencing him to 27 months of imprisonment followed by three years of supervised release after his conviction on two counts of unlawful possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §

819 F.Supp. 1136 (1993) Eduardo ROBINSON-MUÑOZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. Civ. No. 92-2696 (JAF). Crim. No. 90-377. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 30, 1993. *1137 *1138 Eduardo Robinson-Muñoz, petitioner pro se. Daniel López-Romo, U.S. Att

ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6708789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 4450891 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

MOTION TO VACATE 28 U.S.C § 2255 ORDER HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE After pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit racketeering (see doc. 155),1 Eduardo Garibo moves under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his conviction and sentence. Doe. 184. Review of the parties’ briefing shows that his motion must be denied. I. BAC

108 Cal.App.3d 745 (1980) 166 Cal. Rptr. 873 In re EDUARDO G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EDUARDO G., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 36844. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One. July 30, 1980. *749 COUNSEL

*1499 HOBBS, Senior District Judge: Appellants are three defendants who raise an assortment of challenges to their convictions for their roles in a conspiracy to purify contaminated cocaine. Defendants Orestes Miguel Diaz-Gonzalez, Eufemio Ruben Llerena-Acosta, and Rafael Eduardo Freyre-Lazaro were eac

NUMBER 13-24-00035-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 278, EDUARDO RODRIGUEZ, ESTEBAN J. CAVAZOS, JERRY CASTILLO, DAVID L. MAYS JR., AVERY SANTOS, ANDREW SITTERLY JR., MIGUEL F. CARRANCO, MICHAEL DE LA CRUZ, HECTOR CARRILLO, DAVID ROBERTS, RONNIE FLORES, CONNOR HAMILTON, ISRAEL LOPEZ, CHRIS HERNANDEZ, CHRISTIAN SANCHEZ, AND JOSE A. MARTIN

PROCEEDINGS (in chambers): ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT [Docket No. 10] PRESENT: THE HONORABLE S. JAMES OTERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendants Law Offices of Allen Robert King (“LOAK”) and Allen Robert King’s (“King”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil

OPINION Sweet, District Judge. Defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Citi” or “Defendant”) has moved pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a), 9(b) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the amended complaint (the “First Amended Complaint” or “FAC”) filed by Eduardo Negrete and Gervasio Negrete (the “Negretes” or “Plaintiffs”). The Plaintiffs have cross-moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for partial summary