Cases

WAITE, J. {¶ 1} This oil and gas case involves the ownership of mineral interests that lie beneath approximately 153 acres of land located in Springfield Township, Jefferson County. Appellants/Cross-Appellees Jeffrey H. Sharp, Bradley W. Sharp, Gregory C. Smith, J. Kent Smith, Jeffrey S. Smith, Lelah Cline Smith, and Scott Johnson (collectively referred to as "Appellants") appeal a ju

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM

FILED Jun 29 2023, 2:58 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court

ACCEPTED 04-14-00807-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 6/19/2015 3:55:18

*639VAN HOOMISSEN, J. Defendant appeals his conviction for manslaughter in the first degree. ORS 163.118. The case, was tried to the court on stipulated facts following the partial denial of defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence. The issue is whether the trial court erred in denying part of defendant’s motion. We affirm. Shortly before midn

ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 5038192 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-01-00168-CV

46 N.W.2d 618 (1951) 153 Neb. 890 MILLER v. MILLER. No. 32921. Supreme Court of Nebraska. March 2, 1951. *621 Kirkpatrick & Dougherty, York, for appellant. Littrell & Patz, Lincoln, for appellee. Heard before SIMMONS, C. J., and CARTER, MESSMORE, YEAGER, CHAPPELL, WENKE, and BOSLAUGH,

Tom S. Lee, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The case is before the court on separate motions by defendants Tracy Tullos and *558Rob Heflin for summary judgment based on qualified immunity pursuant to Rules 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c). Plaintiff Alan Atwood has responded in opp

MEMORANDUM ** These appeals 1 arise out of the misiden-tification and wrongful arrest and incarceration of Darryl Titus. Detective Rodney Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. Titus appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of complaining witnesses, Edna An-dujo and Jose Delgado, and their employers,

MEMORANDUM ** These appeals 1 arise out of the misiden-tification and wrongful arrest and incarceration of Darryl Titus. Detective Rodney Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. Titus appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of complaining witnesses, Edna An-dujo and Jose Delgado, and their employers,

Kenneth M. Hoyt, United States District Judge Ker'sean Olajuwa Ramey, a Texas inmate incarcerated under a capital conviction and death sentence, filed a federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus on November 13, 2013. (Dkt. No. 7). Ramey alleges that constitutional error infected his trial with unfairness. Having considered Ramey's claims, the state court record, the pleadings, the evidence, and the applicable law, the Court now f

[Cite as Cain Ridge Beef Farm, L.L.C. v. Fisher, 2020-Ohio-4727.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MONROE COUNTY CAIN RIDGE BEEF FARM, LLC ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EDNA LYDIA FISHER ET AL., Defe

400 F.Supp.2d 134 (2005) Besseye NEAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTOR, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-2420 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2005. *135 Ted Justice Williams, Avis E. Buchanan, DC, Public Defender Service, Jeffrey Fred Liss, Mary Elizab

Opinion by Judge MURGUIA; Dissent by Judge PAEZ. *1214OPINION MURGUIA, Circuit Judge: Patrick Sogbein ran a conspiracy to defraud Medicare by providing power wheelchairs to people who did not need them. Sogbein’s wife, Adebola Adebimpe, participated in the cdnspiracy by supplying many of the wheelchairs through a medical equip

ORDER SAM SPARKS, District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Defendants Jonathan Whitted and the City of Austin’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Rule 7(a) Reply and Rule 12(e) More Definite- Statement [# 7], Plaintiff John Stephens Schaefer’s Response thereto [# 12], Defendants’ Reply in support [# 13], Pl

OPINION GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes on before this Court on an appeal in a case in which a former inmate in the custody of the New Jersey Department of Corrections (“NJDOC”), now the appellant, Alexandra Chavarriaga, claims that correctional officers violated her constitutional rights when, without

[Cite as Foulk v. Upper Arlington, 2017-Ohio-4249.] ROBERT C. FOULK Case No. 2017-00132-PQ Requester Special Master Jeffery W. Clark v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON, OHIO Respondent {¶1} On January 10, 2017, the Upper Arlington City Council held a special meeting (the Council meeting) pursuant to public notice. (Request