⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

15 opinions for “Edna G Lundy”

Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998-08-12 · Published · cited 8× · 129 Ohio App. 3d 334; 717 N.E.2d 816
* Reoprter's Note: A discretionary appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio was allowed in (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1437, 702 N.E.2d 1214. However, upon application of appellant Robinson, the cause was dismissed in (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 1401, 706 N.E.2d 784. Defendant-appellant Lundy Robins
Crecelius v. Smithpublic domain
Supreme Court of Iowa · 1964-01-14 · Published · cited 7× · 125 N.W.2d 786; 255 Iowa 1249; 1964 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 718
125 N.W.2d 786 (1964) B. G. CRECELIUS et al., for themselves and all other persons composing that class of persons who are beneficiaries, or their successors, under the Last Will and Testament of Samuel Coleman Zieger, and Rhea Hensley, Harvey E. Trimble, Jack Trimble and John J. Johnson, as member of the aforesaid class, and C. O. Rubow, Administrator De Bonis Non With the Will Annexed of Samuel Coleman Zieger, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013-05-24 · Published · cited 35× · 285 Neb. 952; 831 N.W.2d 696
Nebraska Advance Sheets 952 285 NEBRASKA REPORTS Gibbs Cattle Co., a Nebraska corporation, appellee, v. Edna F. Bixler et al., appellees, and Margaret Bixler and Edward Stephen Cassells, appellants. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed May 24, 2013. No. S-12-687. 1. Equity: Appeal and Error. On appeal from an equity action, an appellate court tries factual questions de novo on the record and, as to question
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004-10-12 · Published · cited 200× · 387 F.3d 210; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 21176
387 F.3d 210 Lisa Michelle LAMBERT, Appellantv.Charlotte BLACKWELL (Administrator of the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women); The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania. No. 03-2282. No. 03-2383. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued January 12, 2004. October 12, 2004.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004-10-12 · Published · cited 459× · 387 F.3d 210
OPINION OF THE COURT CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.BACKGROUND.218 A. The Trial .219 1. The Commomoealth’s Case.220 2. Lambert’s Case.223 B. Procedural
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985-06-25 · Published · cited 0× · 764 F.2d 637
FARRIS, Circuit Judge: Monte Sanborn appeals the grant of summary judgment in the District Court of Idaho, Callister, J., in which the district court found that Sanborn’s wrongful death claim was time-barred. Sanborn had brought a Federal Tort Claims Act wrongful death and survival action against the United States and Wyeth Laboratories, the administrator and the manufacturer of the swine flu vaccine which allegedly resulted i
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985-06-25 · Published · cited 42× · 764 F.2d 637; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20182
764 F.2d 637 In re SWINE FLU PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION.Monte SANBORN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., aNew York corporation doing business in Idaho,Defendants-Appellees. No. 84-4082. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 4, 1985.Decided June 25, 1985.
Yaretsky v. Blumpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979-01-16 · Published · cited 24× · 592 F.2d 65
592 F.2d 65 William YARETSKY, Ralph Cuevas, and the Gray Panthers, NewYork Chapter, Appellees,andMary Foley, Rae Wolper, Rose Shulman, Bessie Rossoff,Pauline Ashkenazy, Sadie Birenzweig, Martha Zahl, EdnaKolman, James Lundy, and Philomena Latona Lundy, on behalfof themselves and all others similarly situated,Intervenors- Appellees,v.Barbara BLUM, Individually and as Acting Commissioner of theNew York State De
Yaretsky v. Blumpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980-08-25 · Published · cited 9× · 629 F.2d 817; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14571
629 F.2d 817 William YARETSKY, Ralph Cuevas, and The Gray Panthers, NewYork Chapter, Plaintiffs-Appellees,andMary Foley, Rae Wolper, Rose Shulman, Bessie Rossoff,Pauline Ashkenazy, Sadie Birenzweig, Martha Zahl, EdnaKolman, James Lundy, and Philomena Latona Lundy, on behalfof themselves and all others similarly situated,Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants,v.Barbara BLUM, Individually and as Acting Commissioner of t
Yaretsky v. Blumpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979-01-16 · Published · cited 24× · 26 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1082; 592 F.2d 65; 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17556
PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Constance Baker Motley, Judge,1 dated January 5, 1978, but filed January 10, 1978. The order granted appellees’ motion for a preliminary injunction against appellants to prevent them from failing to provide resident patients in health care facilities with timely and adequate writte
Yaretsky v. Blumpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980-08-25 · Published · cited 10× · 629 F.2d 817
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs, certified by the district court as that class of persons receiving New York State Medicaid assistance who are residents of nursing homes, were granted a permanent injunction by the District Court for the Southern District, Motley, J., enjoining state authorities and nursing homes from discharging or transferring patients to a different level of care without certain procedural safegu
Story v. Kindtpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997-02-07 · Published · cited 0× · 970 F. Supp. 435; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7531; 1997 WL 377654
MEMORANDUM ORDER BLOCH, District Judge. Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on February 12, 1992, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Ila Jeanne Sensenich for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The
Chester v. Chesterpublic domain
Arizona Supreme Court · 1949-10-03 · Published · cited 18× · 210 P.2d 331; 69 Ariz. 104; 1949 Ariz. LEXIS 94
The plaintiff, H. Ray Chester (hereinafter called appellee), instituted an action against defendant, Edna G. Chester (hereinafter called appellant), for divorce in Yavapai County, Arizona, in 1946, alleging excesses, cruel treatment and outrages against appellee as grounds for divorce. The action was filed September 14, 1946, at which time the appellant was residing in Fort Wayne, Indiana, but in due time she filed an answer and the cause was tried to the court without a jury, both parties be
Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953-11-17 · Published · cited 12× · 60 N.W.2d 832; 245 Iowa 407; 1953 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 465
60 N.W.2d 832 (1953) OLSEN et al. v. CORPORATION OF NEW MELLERAY et al. No. 48277. Supreme Court of Iowa. November 17, 1953. *834 Schoenthaler & Lee, Maquoketa, and Wayne G. Cook of Cook, Blair & Balluf, Davenport, for appellants. *835 Bannister, Carpenter, Ahlers & Cooney,
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997-04-28 · Published · cited 19× · 962 F. Supp. 1521; 1997 WL 219989
962 F.Supp. 1521 (1997) Lisa Michelle LAMBERT v. Mrs. Charlotte BLACKWELL, Supt., et al. Civ. A. No. 96-6244. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 28, 1997. *1522 Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, and Christina Rainville, Peter S. Greenberg, Philadelphia, PA, for Lambert. MEMORANDUM</