Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Edmond H Knox”
State v. Knoxpublic domain
984 P.2d 294 (1999) 160 Or. App. 668 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. James Kenji KNOX, Appellant. (CM93-0464; CA A79581) Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc. Submitted on Remand June 26, 1998. Resubmitted November 19, 1998. Decided May 26, 1999. *295 Kathryn A. Wood for ap
State v. Knoxpublic domain
894 P.2d 1185 (1995) 134 Or. App. 154 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. James Kenji KNOX, Appellant. CM93-0464; CA A79581. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted May 25, 1994. Decided April 26, 1995. *1186 Kathryn A. Wood, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for appella
Edmond v. Clementspublic domain
ORDER R. BROOKE JACKSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendants James Meyer and Bijou Treatment & Training Institute’s (“BTTI defendants”) motion to dismiss [docket #29]; defendants Tom Clements, Jeaneene Miller, Allison Sweeney-Hoover, and Becky R. Lucero’s (“CDOC defendants”) motion to dismiss [# 34]; and the recommendation of a magistrate judge regarding these motions [# 54
Ashford v. Edmond Public School Districtpublic domain
ORDER TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, District Judge. Before the Court are three separate motions to dismiss, which will be addressed together because they raise common issues and advance common arguments through the incorporation of briefs. Defendant Edmond Public School District (the “Distriet”), and all individual defendants sued in their official capacities, seek a dismissal of the action pursuant
United States v. LaFrancepublic domain
729 F.Supp. 7 (1989) UNITED STATES of America, v. Edmond P. LaFRANCE, Peter E. Knox and Richard A. LaFrance, Defendants. Crim. No. 89-213-H. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 6, 1989. *8 Patrick Walsh, U.S. Atty., for U.S. Michael Collora and William H. Kettlewell, Boston, Mass., for Edmond P. LaFran
Steve Knox v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2010-CA-00814-SCT STEVE KNOX, MICHELLE BYROM, BLAYDE GRAYSON, BENNY JOE STEVENS, GERALD HOLLAND, JAN MICHAEL BRAWNER, RODNEY GRAY, JEFFREY HAVARD, RICHARD JORDAN, THONG LE, WILLIE MANNING, WILLIAM MITCHELL, STEPHEN POWERS, LARRY MATTHEW PUCKETT, GARY CARL SIMMONS, AND ALAN DALE WALKER v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/14/2010 TRIAL JUDGE: H
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00420-CV Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn § From the 236th District Court v. § of Tarrant County (236-261874-12) Terry Means, (so-called) Judge, John H. McBryde, (so-called) Judge, Sidney A. Fitzwater, (so-called) Judge, Karen Mitchell, Clerk of the § December 21, 20
02-12-420-CV
230 B.R. 120 (1999) In re PAYLESS CASHWAYS, INC., d/b/a Payless Cashways, d/b/a Furrow, d/b/a Lumberjack, d/b/a Hugh M. Woods, d/b/a Somerville Lumber, d/b/a Knox Lumber, Debtor. Amtech Lighting Services Company, Creditor-Appellant, v. Payless Cashways, Debtor-Appellee. International Association of Lighting Management Companies, Amicus on Behalf of Appellant. BAP Nos. 98-6044WM, 98-6075WM. Unit
Vasquez v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.public domain
192 F.Supp.2d 730 (2001) Maria Olivia VASQUEZ, et. al., Plaintiffs v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC.; General Motors Corp; Lucent Technologies, Inc.; Lucent Technologies Maquiladoras, Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A.1:01-CV-168. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. November 30, 2001. *731 George Edmond Chandler,
Joe Turner v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 21, 2016 JOE TURNER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 98504 Bob R. McGee, Judge No. E2015-00849-CCA-R3-PC – Filed March 8, 2017 The Petitioner, Joe Turner, filed a petition in the Knox County Criminal Court seeking post-conv
Hayes v. ERIE COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTHpublic domain
804 F.Supp.2d 356 (2011) Charles HAYES and Victoria L. Hayes, Administrators of the Estate of Brittany Legler, Deceased, Plaintiffs, v. ERIE COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:06-cv-234-SJM. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 29, 2011. *358 Paul J. Susko, The Gideon Ball House,
Church v. Knoxpublic domain
Swift, Ch. J. The ground taken by the plaintiff, in this ease, is, that the tangible property of tenants in common, and co-partners, can be taken, and sold on execution, for the payment of their individual debts ; that in case of a partnership, each partner is, in law, considered to be an owner, in proportion to the number of the whole ; that the purchaser of such part, becomes tenant in common with the other partners,
Hayes v. Erie County Office of Children and Youthpublic domain
497 F.Supp.2d 684 (2007) Charles HAYES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ERIE COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-234 Erie. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. June 29, 2007. *685 *686 *687 Paul J. Susko, The Gide
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1419C (Filed: December 23, 2020) ) JOHNSON LASKY KINDELIN ) ARCHITECTS, INC., ) ) Contract Disputes Act; contract damages; Plaintiff, ) tort damages; sounding in tort; joint and
United States v. Jamalpublic domain
ORDER Yaphet Jamal pleaded guilty to bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and the district court sentenced him to 96 months’ imprisonment and 3 years’ supervised release. Jamal filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed counsel moves to withdraw because he is unable to discern a nonfrivolous basis for the appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Jamal opposes counsel’s motion. Se
State v. Shannonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Shannon, 2025-Ohio-1224.] COURT OF APPEALS KNOX COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. Robert G. Montgomery, P. J. : Hon. Kevin W. Popham, J. Plaintiff-Appellee :
State v. Linvillepublic domain
78 P.3d 136 (2003) 190 Or. App. 185 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Richard Abe LINVILLE, Appellant. 01CR0188; A116335. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted June 30, 2003. Decided October 22, 2003. *137 Rankin Johnson IV, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant.
Busch v. Farmington Centers Beavertonpublic domain
LINDER., J< This is a wrongful death action brought by the personal representative of decedent’s estate against two nursing care homes. The defendant nursing care homes, by way of affirmative defense, pleaded that the estate had previously settled its claims against them. Defendants further pleaded, by way of a counterclaim, that the former personal representative had breached his good faith duty under the settlement agreem
Edmond R. Glenn and William Burman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporationpublic domain
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge. Appellee-plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, brought a declaratory judgment action to determine its liability under an automobile policy issued by it to appellant Glenn. Previously appellant Burman had sued Glenn claiming substantial damages because of injuries sustained in an accident