Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JULY 20, 2011 Session EDITH NELL ALLEN SHAW v. JERRY EMERSON SHAW Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 62964 James F. Butler, Chancellor No. W2010-02369-COA-R3-CV - Filed September 21, 2011 Mother and Father were divorced in 2006, and Father was ordered to pay child support for the

Appeal from a judgment in a case tried to the court, that awarded damages for deceit against defendants Geis and Smith, and against defendant Intermountain Capital avoiding a mortgage against plaintiffs' realty. Affirmed with costs to Robertsons. The facts developed and reflected in more than a 1,000 page record, at times were controversial but obviously were sifted by the trial judge who analyzed them and as obviously believed those that amply supported his judgment by clear a

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D March 14, 2003 REVISED APRIL 11, 2003 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Charles R. Fulbruge III FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Cl

ORDER HERLONG, District Judge. This matter is before the court with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02 DSC.1 Several motions are pending in the case. On January 25, 2002, United States Magistrate Judge George C. Kosko issued a Report and Recommendation which recommends, inter

676 So.2d 1265 (1995) Guy E. ADAMS, et al. v. Charlie Frank ROBERTSON and Liberty National Life Insurance Company.[1] 1931603 to 1931607, 1931610 to 1931617. Supreme Court of Alabama. December 22, 1995. Rehearing Denied February 16, 1996. *1267 Norman E. Waldrop, Jr., and M. Kathleen Miller of Armbrech

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(C), Ala.R.App.P.; Hereford v.Gingo-Morgan Park, 551 So.2d 918 (Ala. 1989); Boles v. Autery,554 So.2d 959 (Ala. 1989); Auerbach v. Parker, 544 So.2d 943 (Ala. 1989); CRW, Inc. v. Twin Lakes Property Owners Ass'n, Inc.,521 So.2d 939 (Ala. 1988); Fr

FARRELL, Associate Judge: In this appeal we face once again a challenge by the putative natural father (appellant) to a final decree of adoption entered even though, as the trial judge acknowledged, “the natural father was given no notice of the adoption proceedings.” The judge concluded that the putative father’s motion to intervene in the adoption proceeding was barred by the one year statute of limitations governing attempt

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: We took this case en banc to decide whether the seaman plaintiffs in this case, both the injured seamen and the personal representative of the deceased seaman, can recover punitive damages under either the Jones Act or the general maritime law. We affirm the district court and conclude that this case is controlled by the Supreme Court’s decision in Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.,

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Cincu (2024 NY Slip Op 03406) Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Cincu 2024 NY Slip Op 03406 Decided on June 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua

ROBERTSON, Judge. The Division of Family and Children, formerly, the Indiana Department of Public Welfare, hereinafter the State, appeals a summary judgment in favor of Loren and Edith Teckenbrock on a petition for judicial review brought by Donna Owen as guardian of her parents, the Teckenbrocks. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

NEAL, Judge. This is an appeal from the Scott Circuit Court by appellant, Edith M. Munden, from a default judgment in a dissolution of marriage proceedings taken by appellee, Ronald W. Munden. We reverse. The petition for dissolution of marriage was filed by appellee on April 19, 1978, while appellant was an inpatient under a voluntary commitment at the Southern Indiana Mental Health a

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: An anesthesiologist’s clinical privileges at a public hospital were suspended with conditions after an investigation and conferences concerning the death of one of his patients, but before a formal hearing was held. This court must now decide en banc whether the doctor’s discipline followed the dictates of procedural due process. To a reasonable layman, there would be no dilemma: after

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00279-CV VICTOR J. BURGESS, APPELLANTS INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A EYDIE‘S AND APPELLEES BAIL BONDS, AND EDITH BURGESS, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A BURGESS BAIL BONDS V. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; THE APPELLEES DENTON COUNTY BAIL BOND

433 F.Supp. 164 (1977) VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC., et al. v. Mr. Willard E. ROBERTSON et al. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC., et al. v. The UNITED STATES of America. Civ. A. Nos. 75-2708 and 76-275. United States District Court, E. D. Louisiana. May 31, 1977. *165 Roger M. Denton, Metairie, La., for plaintiffs. Ar

325 F.3d 243 Mark ROBERTSON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Janie COCKRELL, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellee. No. 00-10512. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 14, 2003. Randy Schaffer (argued), The Schaffer Firm, Houston, TX, for Petitione

445 P.2d 48 (1968) Edith SPENCER, Plaintiff and appellant, v. George W. ROBERTSON, Executor of The Estate of Lela Gore, Deceased, Defendant and Respondent. No. 11382. Supreme Court of Montana. September 19, 1968. Leo J. Kottas, Sr. (argued), Helena, for appellant. Angland & Marra, Great Falls, Joseph R. Marra (argued), Great Falls, for respondent.

Case: 22-40731 Document: 00517057866 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/06/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED February 6, 2024

02-10-279-CV

81 B.R. 237 (1987) In re WEDTECH CORP., f/k/a Welbilt Electronics Die, Debtor. In re WEDTECH CORP., f/k/a Welbilt Electronics Die Corp., Debtor. WEDTECH CORP., f/k/a Welbilt Electronics Die, Corp., Plaintiff, v. R. Kent LONDON, M.D., International Financial Consulting and Investments, Inc., W. Franklyn Chinn and Financial Management International Inc., Defendants. No. 87 Civ. 4967 (LBS), Bankruptcy No. 86 B 12366 (HC

493 N.E.2d 172 (1986) PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jimmie WHEELER, Virginia Wheeler, Donald Greene, Edith Greene, Preferred Risk Insurance Company, and Celina Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-685A161. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. May 27, 1986. Rehearing Denied July 11, 1986. James R. Fisher, J