Cases

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Several classes of plaintiffs brought suit against their former employer, R.R. Don-nelley & Sons (“Donnelley”), for race discrimination pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Before the court is a single certified question: “[W]hether in a 1996 lawsuit brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 alleging race discrimination in termination of employment, and maintenance of a

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: CERTIFICATE FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, PURSUANT TO MISSISSIPPI RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 20. TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI AND THE HONORABLE JUSTICES THEREOF: The above-styled diversity case involves outcome-determinativ

652 F.3d 577 (2011) Rhonda DANOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edith JONES, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, individually and in her official capacity as presiding officer of the Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit; Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit, an entity created by Congress pursuant to 28 United States Code 332 composed entirely of Article III Judges; Carolyn Dineen King, Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the F

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge, dissenting: With due respect, I dissent from Part III of the majority opiniqn, which upholds the district court’s decision to “equitably subordinate” Augustine’s claim as a creditor to those of Great White’s shareholders. In my view, the district court’s findings justifying subordination are contradictory of earlier proceedings in the case and cannot be upheld. I would vacate a

OPINION OF THE COURT Sullivan, J. P. At issue is a tenant shareholder’s challenge to the fairness of a cooperative corporation’s exercise, upon termination of her tenancy, of an option contained in the corporation’s by-laws to repurchase the tenant’s shares at book value. Plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant cooperative corporation the market value of the 198 shares allocated to the apartment and a sat

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: * This appeal arises out of the litigation surrounding shortfalls in the Singing River Health System (SRHS) pension plan (the Plan) and KPMG’s role as auditor of that plan. On appeal, KPMG asserts that the gateway issue of arbitrability must itself be submitted to an arbitrator and the district court erred in failing to compel the Lowe class to arbitrate its claims. Because KPMG waived the first

*1144 ISHEE, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. ' Wilkinson County Senior Care (WCSC) appeals the judgment of the Wilkinson County Circuit Court denying WCSC’s motion to compel a binding arbitration pursuant to terms in its admission agreement with its patient Maggie Glide-well. Finding error

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 01-3271 EDITH JONES, EUNICE YOUNG, VIRGINIA CLARK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. R.R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. ____________

Case: 24-60371 Document: 73-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 11, 2010 Session SHEMAIN SHERILLE RILEY, ET AL. v. EDITH SWIFT Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 08C-2053 Amanda Jane McClendon, Judge No. M2009-01717-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 29, 2010 The General Sessions Court awarded the plaintiffs an $8,500 judgment for damages arising fr

PER CURIAM: We rehear this matter en banc, see Hernandez v. United States, 771 F.3d 818 (5th Cir.2014) (per curiam) (on petitions for rehearing en banc), to resolve whether, under facts unique to this or any other circuit, the individual defendants in these consolidated appeals are entitled to qualified immunity. Unanimously concluding that the plaintiffs fail to allege a violation of the Fourth Amendment, and that t

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants (“Appellants”) purchased tickets to Super Bowl XLV, but were either displaced from their seats, relocated, or had an obstructed view of the field. The majority of affected tiekethold-ers settled with the National Football League (the “NFL”). Appellants, however, elected to sue, alleging various claims relating to breach of con

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Christopher Guerra pled guilty to illegally transporting an undocumented alien within the United States and was sentenced, within the guidelines, to 41 months of imprisonment followed by three years of supervised release. As a special condition of his supervised release, the district court ordered Guerra to participate in mental

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and integrity of this

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge, joined by SMITH and OWEN, Circuit Judges, dissenting from en banc rehearing: I fully concur in Judge Jolly’s fine dissent from the evenly divided vote to deny rehearing in this important case. I write separately only to observe the uniqueness, at least in this court, of Judge Higginbotham’s full throated “response” to Judge Jolly’s writing. Lest there be any mistake, the panel’s “

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. Judge Dennis dissents from the court’s denial of rehearing en banc and his dissent is attached. The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having vo

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge dissenting. Although I agree with the majority opinion’s careful restatement of applicable law In this intervention-of-right appeal, I cordially disagree with the conclusion that Sierra Club may intervene. As Sierra Club acknowledged in its brief, it seeks the same “ultimate result” as EPA, disclosure of all documents relevant to the Club’s FOIA request that are not statutorily prote

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JULY 20, 2011 Session EDITH NELL ALLEN SHAW v. JERRY EMERSON SHAW Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 62964 James F. Butler, Chancellor No. W2010-02369-COA-R3-CV - Filed September 21, 2011 Mother and Father were divorced in 2006, and Father was ordered to pay child support for the

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion June 30, 2014, 756 F.3d 801) EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: The court having been polled on the modified opinion attached hereto at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the

EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge: * The court has carefully reviewed this appeal through the record of its tortuous and lengthy procedural career. We conclude that Appellants’ arguments are mer-itless, as the carefully wrought opinions of the bankruptcy and district courts patiently explain. There is no justification for prolonging this litigation, nor can we fruitfully add to the decisions already re