Cases

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge. | Appellant, Tom Clowers, challenges both the trial court’s finding that his motion to modify his divorce decree is barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel and its award of travel expenses and attorney’s fees to his ex-wife, appellee Linda Stickel.1 We affirm the trial court’s decision that Tom’s motion to modify is barred by res judicata; re

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Clifton Clowers has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 *752(5th Cir. 2011). Glowers has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the r

STROUD, Judge. David Wayne Clowers (“defendant”) appeals from a conviction for driving while impaired. For the following reasons, we find no error in defendant’s trial. I. Background On 21 September 2008, defendant was charged by a uniform citation in Raleigh, North Carolina with driving while “subject to an impairing substance.” Following his conviction in District Court, Wake County,

532 S.E.2d 98 (2000) 272 Ga. 463 CLOWERS v. SIKES. No. S00A0234. Supreme Court of Georgia. June 12, 2000. *99 Craig L. Cascio, Alpharetta, for appellant. Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne K. Strickland, Wesley S. Wood, Assistant Attorneys

522 So.2d 762 (1988) Robert Earl CLOWERS v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 57403. Supreme Court of Mississippi. April 6, 1988. *763 Merrida P. Coxwell, Jr., Stanfield, Carmody & Coxwell, Jackson, for appellant. Edwin Lloyd Pittman and Mike Moore, Attys. Gen. by Leyser Q. Morris, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.<

401 S.E.2d 662 (1991) Brandon A. CARTER, By and Through his Guardian Ad Litem, Alvin Carter, Plaintiff, v. John William CLOWERS and Joseph Alexander Deeney, Defendants. No. 9010SC698. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 19, 1991. *663 Kirby, Wallace, Creech, Sarda, Zaytoun & Cashwell by Peter J. Sarda and Richard P. Nor

OPINION OF THE COURT KATHLEEN A. KEARNEY, County Judge. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and the Court, having reviewed the court file and heard arguments of counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant, makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Chief Judge. The defendant has filed a plea to the jurisdiction, a motion to quash service of process, and a motion to dismiss. At the hearing on December 23, 1964, attended by the official reporter, the Court advised counsel that it would treat the motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment and would consider the pleadings and exhibits, including a transcript of the proceedings before the Deputy

131 F.3d 951 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 891 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Calvin Maurice BOYD, a.k.a., "Mee Tee"; Pinkney Clowers,III, a.k.a. "Boo Boo", a.k.a. "Dog", a.k.a"Cameiko", Defendants-Appellants.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Calvin M. BOYD, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Pinkney CLOWERS, III, a.k.a. Dog

ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge: These two appeals have a common issue : whether an employee injured aboard his employer’s ship on navigable waters may, on the allegation that he is a seaman, sue his employer for damages upon the Jones Act 1 or the genera

980 F.2d 1213 J.E. ALLISON; Patricia Allison; E.C. Benton; Phyllis M.Bertsch; Jane Calloway; William R. Canino; Cecil JeanChamness; Jessie Chamness; Terry Clowers; Charles Donham;Riley Donica; David Elms; Henry Ginger; Jimmy D. Hannah;Don Howard; Dorothy Landry; Billy Lenderman; McNeillAgency Inc.; Dennis McNeill; James McNeill; PatsyMcNeill; Eudox Patterson; Bill D. Plunkett; CatherinePlunkett; And

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-23-00013-CR No. 10-23-00014-CR CHASE ANDREW CLOWER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the County Court at Law Navarro County, Texas Trial

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 3, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ Nos. 3D25-0865, 3D25-0869 Lower Tribunal No. 23-20769-CA-01 ________________ Dorilton Capital Management LLC, Appellant/Petit

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 3, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ Nos. 3D25-0865, 3D25-0869 Lower Tribunal No. 23-20769-CA-01 ________________ Dorilton Capital Management LLC, Appellant/Petit

[Cite as State v. Franklin, 2025-Ohio-4510.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2025-03-017 : OPINION AND - vs - J

Karen R. Baker, Justice, concurring. I agree with the majority's disposition; however, I write separately for the reasons stated in my dissent in Board of Trustees of University of Arkansas v. Andrews , 2018 Ark. 12,

213 S.W.3d 607 (2005) John ROSE; Stephen Rose; Tom Burnham; Oliver Coppedge; John Starnes; John McCord; Glenda Lee Coppedge; Billy Crosskno; Chris Crosskno; Judy Crosskno; Roy A. Gaines; R.D. Jackson; Kenny Jackson; Charles Richard Haynes; W.T. Moody; Greg Alexander; George A. Hale III; Margery Hale; Bill Griggs; John R. Taylor; Kent Gipson; Shannon Sanders; Jerry Lyn Sanders; Jerry D. Qualls; Leon Brothers; Ronnie Burks; Jerry Nall; Bob Nall; Wesley Dav

[Cite as State v. Flack, 2024-Ohio-4622.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NOS. CA2024-01-010 CA2024-01-012 :

COLIN S. BRUCE, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background Plaintiff's Complaint (# 1) was filed November 13, 2015, alleging three counts. Count I alleged unlawful First Amendment retaliation and prior restraint, Count II alleged a violation of Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law, and Count III alleged a state law pendent claim. Defe