Cases

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________

Affirmed.

*1269 GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Defendants-appellants William Stewart, Sr. (Stewart, Sr.), Mario Hennington (Hen-nington), and Eddie Walker (Walker) appeal their convictions and/or sentences arising from their roles in a conspiracy to distribute cocaine and

PER CURIAM: Nelson Eddy Walker, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by *269the district court. Wa

PER CURIAM. Nelson Eddy Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of a magistrate judge to construe his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion as a successive motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and denying it. The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent

OPINION ANNE GARDNER, JUSTICE Eddie Kent sued K.B. Alexander Co. of Texas, Inc. (KBA) and Keith B. Alexander (Alexander), individually, for breach of contract and fraud in the course of performance by KBA of a contract for construction of a car lot. Kent alleged KBA and Alexander obtained progress payments. from Kent based upon false payment .applications m

LEE, C.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. In this case, we must determine whether the chancellor erred in voiding a tax sale and in finding that the tax-sale purchaser did not acquire the subject property by adverse possession. Additionally, we must determine if statutory damages were properly awarded to the tax-sale purchaser. Finding error regarding the chancellor's calculation of the statutory damages, we affirm in part and rever

WILLIAMS, J. _[xjhe plaintiffs, Milton Lee and Mary Lee, on behalf of Sheila Lee, appeal the trial court’s award of damages. The trial court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (“JNOV”) and awarded plaintiffs the amount of $17,000 in general damages. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS On July 27, 2009, Carolyn Martin was involved in a traffi

611 F.3d 322 (2010) Daryl MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDDIE MURPHY PRODUCTIONS, INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-3267. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 12, 2010. Decided July 1, 2010. *323 Andjelko Galic (argued), Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Mark

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 8, 2012 Session Heard at Memphis EDDIE C. PRATCHER, JR. v. METHODIST HEALTHCARE MEMPHIS HOSPITALS ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-0070011-00 Donna M. Fields, Judge No. W2011-01576-SC-S09-CV - Filed June 28, 2013 The primary issue in this interlocut

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

ORDER PER CURIAM. Eddie Walker (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing after he pleaded guilty to sale of a controlled substance (cocaine) in violation of Section 195.211, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the *821record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly err

ORDER PER CURIAM. Eddie Walker, Defendant, appeals from the judgment and sentence after his jury conviction for sale or delivery of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.211, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years of imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of l

IRVING, P.J., DISSENTING: ¶ 21. The majority finds that the dismissal of Walker's complaint was proper, although a bit premature. Because I find that the circuit court apparently acted upon information not properly before it, I dissent. I would reverse and remand this case for further proceedings. I explain. ¶ 22. The majority's holding is not premised on defective service of process, because t

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: Eddie Vincent Walker appeals his conviction and 248-month sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, following a jury trial, for possession with intent to distribute cocaine within 1,000 feet of a secondary school in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 860, and carrying a firearm during the commission of a drug trafficking crime in viol

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (George M. Raus, Jr., R.), entered May 19, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition seeking visitation for lack of jurisdiction. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the petition is reinstated and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Onondaga County, for fur

In re Walker, Eddie et al.; — Plaintiffs); applying for rehearing of this court’s Order dated August 12, 1996; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW96 1391; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 74,062. Rehearing denied. JOHNSON and VICTORY, JJ., would grant the rehearing. LEMMON, J., not on panel; recused.

31 So.3d 1189 (2010) GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Martha WALKER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 44,995-WCA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. March 3, 2010. *1190 James D. "Buddy" CALDWELL Attorney General, for Appellant. Eddie David Gilmer, Assistant Attorney General, William R. Long, for Appell

JOAN BERNARD ARMSTRONG, Chief Judge. _JjOn January 7, 2005, in case number 455-092 “K”, the state filed a bill of information charging the defendant, Cynthia M. Walker, with solicitation of crime against nature, a violation of La. R.S. 14:89(2). The defendant pleaded not guilty at her arraignment on January 12, 2005. The defendant’s bond was reduced to $5000.00 and she filed a bond on February 3, 2005. Trial and a hearing on

In re Liaison Committee; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW96 1391; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 74,062. Writ granted. The ruling of the appellate court dissolving the plaintiffs liaison committee is reversed and the trial court order establishing the committee prior to certification is reinstated. VI