Cases

FAHY, Circuit Judge. Appellant, tried with Tommie A. Johnson, whose appeal in Johnson v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. —, 369 F.2d 949, is also decided this day, was convicted of robbery in violation of D.C. Code § 22-2901 (1961 ed.). The evidence was conflicting and confusing. Indeed, appellant’s charact

SCOTT, J., dissenting: I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion because it extends the one-year professional services statute of limitations set forth in KRS 413.245 to acts of common theft at the expense of Kentucky citizens. Given that Appellee Austin provided only nominal services to Appellants, and considering the limited extent and non-legal nature of those services, I believe the five-year

COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS GEORGE SNYDER, ELMA A. SNYDER ) GREENLEE, and MARTHA G. SNYDER, )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1355 Filed June 5, 2024 IN THE MATTER OF THE TRUST OF DUANE M. PAGEL, RICHARD PAGEL, Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Fayette County, Richard D. Stochl, Judge. A former trustee appeals the ruling denying his application for fees, costs, and expenses. AFFIRMED IN

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-0260 Filed February 19, 2020 SHAWN SHELTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. THE TRUST CREATED BY THE JOINT TRUST AGREEMENT OF LARRY E. SHELTON and KATHERINE SHELTON, MARY JOLEEN PAVELKA, ANN JETORA MUELLER f/k/a JETORA ANN MUELLER, and JAN MARIE GWINN, Defendants-Appellants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa

02/05/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICHARD SHANE FRAZIER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 17-326 Donald H. Allen, Judge No. W2018-00225-CCA-R3-CD A Madiso

456 S.W.2d 931 (1970) Eddie BYRD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 43045. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. July 22, 1970. *932 Grady O. Trimble, Jr., Kountze, for appellant. R. S. (Stanley) Coe, Dist. Atty., and Dwayne V. Overstreet, County Atty., Kountze, Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the St

597 F.Supp.2d 730 (2009) Fay E. WILLIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeffery Michael WALLACE, et al., Defendants. No. 3:08 CV 295. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. February 5, 2009. *731 Fan Zhang, C. William Bair, Wagoner & Steinberg, Holland, OH, for Plaintiffs. J. Mark Trimble, Kate E. Schuyler,

[Cite as State v. McNear, 2022-Ohio-2365.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 111007 v. : D’SHAUN MCNEAR, :

[Cite as State v. Mutter & Mutter, 2016-Ohio-512.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Case Nos. 15CA3690 15CA3691 Plaintiff-Appellant, : v. : DECISION A

403 S.W.2d 145 (1966) Robert Eddie Louis JACKSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 38841. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. February 16, 1966. Rehearing Denied April 13, 1966. Second Motion for Rehearing Denied May 25, 1966. *146 Sid S. Stover, Jasper, for appellant. Grady

749 F.Supp. 142 (1990) Wayne TUCKER and Elna Tucker, Plaintiffs, v. AQUA YACHT HARBOR CORP., Chrysler Motor Corp., and Aluminum Cruisers, Inc., Defendants. No. DC89-W114-S-O. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division. October 24, 1990. *143 Michael Lewis, Luckett Law Firm, P.A., Clarksdale, Miss., for plainti

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 97-1390EA _____________ Jerry X. Ellis, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Michael D. Walker; Eddie Gray, Jr.; * Shahid Taqwa, als

BRYAN, Justice (dissenting). I agree that, under our current precedent, a wrongful-death action commenced by someone other than the personal representative is a nullity. However, I believe that precedent is out of line with the modern trend and should be overruled. The plaintiff, Paula B. Noble (“Paula”), has placed this issue squarely before us by asking us to overrule that precedent. I believe her request i

261 F.Supp.2d 1047 (2003) Theresa M. ZEIGLER, individually; and Theresa M. Zeigler, as mother and next friend of Madisen Zeigler, Plaintiff, v. FISHER-PRICE, INC., Defendant. No. C01-3089-PAZ. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. May 8, 2003. Stephen F. Avery, Cornwall, Avery, Bjornstad, Scott, Spencer, I A, for plaintiff. Cheryl Possent

Tom Glaze, Justice. Petitioner Andrew Engram has filed a motion to recall the mandate and reopen his case. Engram was charged in the June 10, 1997, capital murder and rape of Laura White, a security guard working at Sears in North Little Rock. Ajury convicted him on both counts on January 28, 1999, and sentenced him to death. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by this court on May 4, 2000. See Engra

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 12–1378 Filed January 31, 2014 STAR EQUIPMENT, LTD., Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee, and MANATT’S, INC. and SHORT’S CONCRETE CUTTING CO., Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Adair County, John D. Lloyd, Judge. Subcontractors appeal ruling on scope of remedies under Iowa Code section 5

179 F.3d 1078,Jerry X. ELLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,Michael D. Walker; Eddie Gray, Jr.; Shahid Taqwa, also knownas John Smith, Plaintiffs,v.Larry B. NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department ofCorrection; R. Toney, Arkansas Department of Correction;Mrs. McQuilliams, Arkansas Department of Correction; L.Inmon, Arkansas Department of Correction; Mrs. Day, ArkansasDepartment of Correction; C.A. Collins, Arkansas Departmentof Correction; D. Gunt

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-3783 ___________________________ United States ex rel. Eric Fields lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District,

*876 KELLY, Circuit Judge. Bi-State Development Agency (Bi-State) appeals the denial of its motion for summary judgment. It argues that the district court 1 erred in holding that Bi-State was not an arm of the state and therefore not entitled to