Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Eddie Lee Jones”
Eddie Lee Denhardt v. Carl E. Jonespublic domain
FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, P. J., GOBEIL and PINSON, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules May
Eddie Willie Taylor, Jr. v. Ruby Lee Taylor Jonespublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13-00147-CV EDDIE WILLIE TAYLOR, JR., Appellant v. RUBY LEE TAYLOR JONES, Appellee From the 335th District Court Burleson County, Texas Trial Court No. 27,06
Eddie Willie Taylor, Jr. v. Ruby Lee Taylor Jonespublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13-00147-CV EDDIE WILLIE TAYLOR, JR., Appellant v. RUBY LEE TAYLOR JONES, Appellee From the 335th District Court Burleson County, Texas Trial Court No. 27,069
Jones v. Jonespublic domain
DREW, J. pNotwithstanding the multiple volumes in this appeal, the sole issue before this court is whether the trial court abused its *26discretion in denying Hurie Jones’ Motion to Reopen the Succession of John Jones, Sr. (date of death: August 19, 2006). This record is filled with myriad complaints and issues asserted by the appellant. We can discern
Eddie Humes, Sr. v. Misty Jonespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2202 ___________________________ Eddie Humes, Sr. Plaintiff - Appellee v. Misty Jones, Lt., in his/her individual and official capacities as Sheriff Deputy for White
EDDIE JAMES JONES v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D23-751 Lower Tribunal No. 22-CF-014220 _____________________________ EDDIE JAMES JONES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA,
Eddie Lee Daugherty v. Taylor ReAnn Pinkstonpublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00207-CV ___________________________ EDDIE LEE DAUGHERTY, Appellant V. TAYLOR REANN PINKSTON, Appellee On Appeal from the 231st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 231-707831-21 Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr
Jones v. Statepublic domain
CARLTON, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Eddie Ray Jones was convicted in the Circuit Court of Bolivar County of aggravated assault and sentenced as a habitual offender to twenty years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC). Thereafter, Jones filed a post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), which was denied by the trial court. Jones then filed a post-trial motion
State v. Leepublic domain
LEON A. CANNIZZARO, JR., Judge. hThe defendant, David Lee, is appealing a decision by the trial court refusing to set aside his convictions and sentences. Mr. Lee contends that his right to due process was violated and that, therefore, he should be granted a new trial. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Mr. Lee was charged by a bill of information with one count each of (1) aggravated rape, (2) agg
State v. Eddie Lee Anthonypublic domain
N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. ¶ 1. On August 20, 2010, Eddie Lee Anthony (Anthony) killed S.J., the mother of his children. The evidence showed that Anthony beat and stabbed S.J. 45 times with an ice *122pick while their children hid in a closet in the next room. In addition to the puncture wounds, S.J. suffered four broken ribs, as well as numerous abrasions and contusio
United States v. Mathis, Eddie J.public domain
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON. KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Appellants Eddie Mathis, Walter Mathis and Maurice Lee were convicted on a single count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with the intent to distribute heroin and cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The appellants challenge their convicti
United States v. Eddie Leepublic domain
ROVNER, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted defendant-appellant Eddie Lee of conspiring to distribute and possessing with the intent to distribute 50 or more grams of a substance containing cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. The district court ordered him to serve a prison term of 20 years. Lee appeals, contending that the district court a
Jones v. Statepublic domain
John I. Purtle, Justice. A Craighead County jury convicted appellant of the offenses of rape, kidnapping, and theft of property. He was sentenced to consecutive terms of life, life, and 10 years, respectively, in the Arkansas Department of Correction. He argues seven points for reversal. We find that none of the assignments of error were prejudicial to the appellant, and accordingly affirm.
Jones v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. We reject appellant’s contention that the trial court’s failure to conduct a Richardson * hearing or to grant a continuance entitles him to a new trial. As to the first point, a review of the record reveals that the state supplied Jones with all the information in its possession, thereby removing the need for a Richardson hearing. See Marshall v.
Clark v. Eddie Bauer LLCpublic domain
No. 16 June 29, 2023 177 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Susan CLARK, for herself and/or on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. EDDIE BAUER LLC and Eddie Bauer Parent, LLC, Appellees. (United States Court of Ap
United States v. Eddie Lee Strongpublic domain
*987 RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. A jury found Eddie Strong, a felon, guilty of possessing ammunition but acquitted him of possessing a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He was sentenced to 62 months’ imprisonment. Evidence was admitted at trial demonstrating that drugs were sold at the
Eddie Orcutt v. Charles Chamblisspublic domain
GRIFFIS, P.J., CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART: ¶ 38. Here, the majority affirms a judgment that concludes a parcel of property is ownerless and awards a monetary judgment against no one. I find that there are fundamental errors in the chancellor's judgment that require we reverse and remand this case for a new trial. I therefore respectfully dissent from the decision to affirm
Jones v. Buchananpublic domain
Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge DAVIS joined. Judge LUTTIG wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises out of an incident in which a North Carolina deputy sheriff *523knocked Edward Arthur Jones to the fl
Henry Lee Jones v. State of Floridapublic domain
PER CURIAM. Henry Lee Jones appeals his conviction for the first-degree murder of Carlos Perez and sentence of death. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons explained below, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND On August 27, 2003, the body of nineteen-year-old Carlos Perez was found in a motel room in Melbourne, Florida. Jones was indicted for the murder in 2011.
Jones v. Buchananpublic domain
325 F.3d 520 Edward Arthur JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Richard BUCHANAN, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Avery County; Lee Keller, individually and in his official capacity as a Deputy of the Avery County Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellees, andEddie Hughes, individually and in his official capacity as a Deputy of the Avery County Sheriff's Department; Avery County, North Carolina, a Body Corporate and Po