Cases

No. 16 June 29, 2023 177 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Susan CLARK, for herself and/or on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. EDDIE BAUER LLC and Eddie Bauer Parent, LLC, Appellees. (United States Court of Ap

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SUSAN CLARK, for herself No. 21-35334 and/or on behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:20-cv-01106-JCC v. ORDER CERTIFYING EDDIE BAUER LLC; EDDIE QUESTION TO THE BAUER PARENT, LLC, OREGON SUPREME Defendants-Appellees.

JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Before the court is Defendant Eddie Bauer, LLC's ("Eddie Bauer") motion to dismiss (2d MTD (Dkt. # 40) ) Plaintiff Veridian Credit Union's ("Veridian") first amended putative class action complaint (FAC (Dkt. # 36) ).1 The court has considered Eddie Bauer's motion, Veridian's response (Resp. (Dkt. # 53) ), Eddie

239 S.W.3d 693 (2007) Brian FISHER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BAUER CORPORATION, Defendant, and Adzick Construction Co., LLC, Defendant/Respondent. No. ED 89432. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. December 4, 2007. *696 Alan S. Mandel, Michael J. Sudekum, Schlueter, Mandel & Mandel, LLP, St. Louis, M

*1176 ORDER RE: CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MOTIONS TO STRIKE GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., District Judge. Columbia Sportswear USA Corp. (“Columbia”) and Eddie Bauer LLC (“Eddie Bauer”) each seek summary judgment on the claims in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF Nos. 125, 126.) Plaintiff opposes each motion and also

283 S.W.3d 300 (2009) Beverly EDDY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Sheila ARMSTRONG, Defendant/Respondent. No. ED 91257. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. May 19, 2009. J. Richard McEachern, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Susan F. Jacobsen, Carter Bauer Soule, LLC, Clayton, MO, for respondent. Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Thomas A. Haynes, Plaintiff Below, Petitioner vs) No. 15-1203 (Harrison County 14-C-145) Antero Resources Corporation and Eddie Rush Southern, Defendants Below, Respondents MEMORANDUM DECISION Petitioner Thomas A. Haynes, by counsel Stephen A. Wickland, appeals the November 18, 2015, order of the Circuit Court of Harrison County that denied his motio

OPINION MOTZ, Senior District Judge: Chris Kohler appeals the district court’s rulings in favor of defendant Eddie Bauer following a bench trial on Kohler’s claims under the “Americans with Disabilities Act” (“ADA”). Eddie Bauer cross-appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for attorneys’ fees. We vacate and remand in part and affirm in part

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SHAWNNA MONTES, on behalf of No. 23-35496 herself and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00201- Plaintiff-Appellant, TOR v. ORDER CERTIFYING SPARC GROUP, LLC, QUESTION TO

Hon. William Q. Hayes, United States District Judge The matter before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 100) filed by Defendant Monterey Financial Services, LLC. I. Background On October 15, 2013, Plaintiff Tiffany Brinkley initiated this action by filing a Complaint (ECF No. 1-3) against Monterey Financial Services, Inc. in the Superior Court of the State of California in

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON APRIL 2, 2026 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON APRIL 2, 2026 SARAH R. PENDLETON

By report and recommendation dated July 12, 2018, Judge Orenstein recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff's motion ("R & R"). (See generally R & R, Docket Entry No. 76.) Plaintiff filed objections to the R & R on July 18, 2018. (Pl. Obj. to R & R ("Pl. Obj."), Docket Entry No. 77.) Defendants responded to the objections on August 1, 2018. (Defs. Resp. to Pl. Obj. ("Defs. Resp."), Docket Entry No. 78.) For the reasons set forth belo

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Christa Robey v. SPARC Group LLC (A-50-22) (087981) Argued November 6, 2023 -- Decided March 25, 2024 SOLOMON, J., writing for the Court. The core issue in this appeal is whether plaintiff

MEMORANDUM * Plaintiffs, a class of “consumers of tobacco products,” allege that the states of California and Utah, the city of San Francisco, and several tobacco companies (collectively, Defendants) violated their rights to equal protection and due process when Defendants entered into the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA). The district court dismissed the action, holding that Plaintiffs do not have standing

*897 ORDER K. J. MUELLER, District Judge. This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment brought by plaintiff Lary Feezor (“Feezor” or “plaintiff’) and defendant Eddie Bauer LLC (“Eddie Bauer”). Also before the court are the cross-motions for summary judgment brought by defendant Hanesbrands Direct, LLC (“Hanesbrands”

MEMORANDUM OPINION CYNTHIA REED EDDY, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION For the reasons set forth below, Edward Constant’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus will be denied in part and granted in part. A. Double Jeopardy And Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Federal habeas relief is not warranted on petitioner’s claim that trial cou

ORDER Eddie Rainey applied for temporary work as a truck driver for United Parcel Sendee in five different years from 1997 through 2011. He was hired in three of those years yet still sued UPS claiming that he was turned down the other times because he is black. The district court granted summary judgment for UPS, and Rainey appeals. We affirm the judgment. *607

420 F.Supp.2d 1217 (2005) OVERSTOCK.COM, INC., Plaintiff, v. FURNACE BROOK, LLC, Defendant. No. 2:05-CV-00679 PGC. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. October 31, 2005. John P. Ashton, Sam Meziani, Thomas R. Barton, Van Cott Bagley Cornwall & McCarthy, Salt Lake City, UT, John H. Barr, Jr., Richard F. Whiteley, Bracewell & Guiliani, Hous

22 April 1, 2026 No. 229 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Sonja BOHR, Tamara Barnes, Karen Foglesong, and Mary Wood, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. TILLAMOOK COUNTY CREAMERY ASSOCIATION, an Oregon cooperative corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

727 F.Supp.2d 1038 (2010) GREAT NECK SAW MANUFACTURERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. STAR ASIA U.S.A., LLC, Defendant. No. C06-647Z. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. July 23, 2010. *1040 Joseph J. Previto, Collard & Roe, Roslyn, NY, Jerry A. Riedinger, Ryan McBrayer, Perkins Coie, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff.<