⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Ed Map, Inc.”

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-02-04 · Published · cited 2× · 2020 Ohio 358
[Cite as Ed Map, Inc. v. Delta Career Edn. Corp., 2020-Ohio-358.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Ed Map, Inc., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 18AP-712 v. : (C.P.C. No. 18CV-2305) Delta Career Educati
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Hocking County · 2017-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 94 N.E.3d 51; 2017 Ohio 5731
McFarland, J. {¶ 1} Jonathan D. Freed appeals the Hocking County Court of Common Pleas' decision affirming the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission's decision allowing his unemployment compensation benefits, but reducing them to zero based upon its determination that Appellant received deductible remuneration in the form of separation pay that exceeded
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016-03-08 · Published · cited 6× · 168 F. Supp. 3d 881; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30590; 2016 WL 1031295
MEMORANDUM OPINION Liam O’Grady, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant *883Rouse Properties Inc. (“Rouse”). Plaintiff Peschke Map Technologies LLC (“Pesch-ke”) filed a Complaint against Rouse on October 20, 2015, claiming patent infringement.1 Rouse, in
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010-09-07 · Published · cited 0× · 725 F. Supp. 2d 597; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92757
725 F.Supp.2d 597 (2010) W. Lynn FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. MAP OIL TOOLS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. C-10-4. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division. July 16, 2010. Order Denying Reconsideration September 7, 2010. *599 Finley L. Edmonds, Finley L. Edmonds Inc., Corpus Christi, TX, Ro
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012-03-20 · Published · cited 7× · 876 F. Supp. 2d 122; 2012 WL 968016; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37240
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFFS’ BILL OF COSTS AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE COSTS (Document Nos. 52 and 51) NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Peter and Lisa Hillman (“Plaintiffs”), having accepted an Offer of Judgment from Berkshire Medical Center, Inc. (“BMC”), seek reimbursement for various costs, amounting in total to $11,101.39, in connection with their claims again
District Court, District of Columbia · 2015-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 128 F. Supp. 3d 46; 2015 WL 4932305
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Art Drauglis brought this copyright action against defendant Kappa Map Group, LLC, arising out of defendant’s use of a photograph taken by plaintiff as the cover art for a commercially-released Montgomery County, Maryland street atlas. Compl. [Dkt. # 1]. In Count I, plaintiff claims that defendant infringed his valid copyri
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016-10-18 · Published · cited 0×
[J-44A-2016 and J-44B-2016] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, JJ. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE : No. 11 MAP 2015 EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, BY LYNNE : WILSON, GENERAL COUNSEL, : Appeal from the Order of the WILLIAM MCGILL, F. DARLENE : Commonwealth Court at No. 396 MD ALBAUGH, HEATHER KOLANICH, : 2009 dated February 17,
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013-09-17 · Published · cited 1× · 145 Conn. App. 718; 78 A.3d 148; 2013 WL 4792451; 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 452
Opinion ROBINSON, J. The defendants DSBNC, LLC, D.H. Williams, Inc., Moosehom Road, LLC (Moosehom, LLC), and John H. Parks1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Ed Lally & Associates, Inc., following a court trial, for the foreclosure of two mechanic’s hens, breach of contract and quantum meruit. On appeal, the defendants cla
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2025-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Jersey City United Against the New Ward Map v. Jersey City Ward Commission (A-10/11-24) (089292) Argued January 6, 2025 -- Decided June 18, 2025 PATTERSON, J., writing for the Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2024-03-12 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-0356-22 A-0560-22 JERSEY CITY UNITED AGAINST THE NEW WARD MAP, DOWNTOWN COALITION OF APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS, March 12, 2024 GREENVILLE
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-11-20 · Published · cited 0×
[J-20-2024] [MO: Wecht, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., : No. 8 MAP 2023 : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court at No. 803 FR
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-11-20 · Published · cited 0×
[J-20-2024] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., : No. 8 MAP 2023 : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth C
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023-11-22 · Published · cited 0×
[J-15-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. GLENN O. HAWBAKER, INC., : No. 20 MAP 2022 : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court at No.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2025-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
[J-16-2025] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. INTERSTATE GAS SUPPLY, INC. D/B/A : No. 10 MAP 2024 IGS ENERGY, NRG ENERGY, INC. AND : SHIPLEY CHOICE LLC D/B/A SHIPLEY : Appeal from the Order of the ENERGY, : Commonwealth Cour
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA William Penn School District; : Panther Valley School District; : The School District of Lancaster; : Greater Johnstown School District; : Wilkes-Barre Area School District; : Shenandoah Valley School District; : Jamella and Bryant Miller, parents of : K.M., a minor; Sheila Armstrong, : parent of S.A., minor; Tracey Hughes, : parent of P.M.H., minor; Pennsylvania : Association of R
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-02-21 · Published · cited 0×
[J-31-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. VINCULUM, INC., : No. 74 MAP 2022 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Superior Court dated Novem
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019-04-26 · Published · cited 31× · 206 A.3d 1096
SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. OPINION CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR This matter arises due to the failure of a New Jersey couple to pay for their adult son's stay at a Pennsylvania nonprofit residential facility. It primarily raises a choice-of-law issue in relation to the two states' f
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008-08-19 · Published · cited 98× · 953 A.2d 514; 598 Pa. 16; 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1332
953 A.2d 514 (2008) Robert C. JUBELIRER, Senator and President Pro Tempore of the Pennsylvania Senate, and John M. Perzel, Representative and Speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, Appellants v. Edward G. RENDELL, Governor of Pennsylvania; Robin L. Wiessmann, State Treasurer of Pennsylvania; Michael J. Masch, Secretary of Budget and Administration of Pennsylvania; Estelle Richman, Secretary of Public Welfare of Pennsylvania; Pennsy
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019-04-26 · Published · cited 34× · 207 A.3d 855
JUSTICE DONOHUE, Dissenting In my view, the unambiguous language of 21 P.S. § 3511 requires the conclusion that the recording of all deeds and other conveyances of real property2 is mandatory in Pennsylvania. The Majority believes that the use of "shall" in section 351 is ambiguous and reaches the opposite conclusion. While I do not agree that the statute is ambiguous, if th
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989-08-31 · Published · cited 5× · 105 B.R. 5; 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1456; 1989 WL 100707
105 B.R. 5 (1989) In re MAP INTERNATIONAL, INC., Debtor. In re MOLDED ACOUSTICAL PRODUCTS OF WEST VIRGINIA, INC., Debtor. In re MOLDED ACOUSTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Debtor. In re MOLDED ACOUSTICAL PRODUCTS OF INDIANA, INC., Debtor. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 31, 1989. Charles M. Golden, Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell & Hippel, Philadelphia, Pa., for