Cases

Case: 09-40544 Document: 00511871251 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 30, 2012 No. 09-40544 Ly

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge: Joseph Ebron was sentenced to death for the murder of a fellow inmate. He now appeals his conviction and sentence. In addition, he is also challenging the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. For the following reasons, we affirm his conviction, sentence, and the denial of his motion. I.

Opinion KELLER, J. The petitioner, Travis Wright, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the habeas court abused its discretion when it denied the petition for certification to appeal and that it improperly rejected his claims that (1) his tria

61 N.J. 146 (1972) 293 A.2d 380 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. ARTHUR WRIGHT, JR., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued April 25, 1972. Decided July 21, 1972. *147 Mr. David Noah Dubrow, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Joseph P. Lord

James C. Mahan, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Presently before the court is plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company's *1117("plaintiff") motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 41). Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") filed a response (ECF No. 46), to which plaintiff replied (ECF No. 49). Also before the court

ORDER RICHARD F, BOULWARE, II, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This is a quiet title and wrongful foreclosure action brought by Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”). Chase, which was the beneficiary of a deed of trust encumbering certain real property in Las Vegas, Nevada, brought suit seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief against a homeowners ass

MIRANDA M. DU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *933I. SUMMARY This dispute arises from the foreclosure sale of property to satisfy a homeowners' association lien. Before the Court are Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's ("SFR") motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 109); Plaintiff Bank of New York Mellon's ("

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA CHRISTIANA TRUST, A DIVISION OF No. 81713 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS : INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT AS TRUSTEE OF ARLP TRUST 3, PILE Appellant, vs. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Res • ondent. ORDER OF REVERSAL AND REMAND This is an appeal from a district court j

ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the court is SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s (“SFR”) motion for security for costs pursuant to NRS 118.130(1). ECF No. 9. This case involves a homeowners association’s (“HOA”) non-judicial foreclosure of real property in Sparks, Nevada. ECF No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank is the beneficiary of the subject property’s deed o

Garry, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Montgomery County (Catena, J.), rendered June 20, 2014, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts). In November 2013, defendant’s parole officer discovered heroin during a ro

ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE, United States Magistrate Judge Pending before the Court is the motion to compel and the motion for sanctions filed by Plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (“Na-tionstar”). Docket No. 60. Defendant SFR Investment Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) filed a response in opposition, and Nationstar filed a reply. Docket Nos. 64, 66. The motions are properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-443 No. COA21-483 Filed 5 July 2022 Wake County, No. 14 CVD 2713 KIMBERLY BOSSIAN, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS BOSSIAN, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from orders entered 29 April 2021 and 24 May 2021 by Judge Mark Stevens in Wake County District Court. Heard in the

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 03/23/2018 08:14 AM CDT - 522 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 298 Nebraska R eports STATE v. HUFF Cite as 298 Neb. 522 State of Nebraska

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-443 No. COA21-483 Filed 5 July 2022 Wake County, No. 14 CVD 2713 KIMBERLY BOSSIAN, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS BOSSIAN, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from orders entered 29 April 2021 and 24 May 2021 by Judge Mark Stevens in Wake County District Court. Heard in the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID EARL WATTLETON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No.: 19-1893 (BAH) ) Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell

OPINION WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge: Nevada has a statute that gives a homeowners’ association lien priority over “all other liens and encumbrances” (subject to some limited exceptions) for up to nine months of unpaid HOA fees. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.3116(2)-(3) (2012). This statute has engendered substantial litigation in both state and federal courts.

Case: 20-20094 Document: 00516699213 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/03/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED April 3, 2023

Garry, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Giardino, J.), rendered March 21, 2012, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of assault in the second degree (two counts), aggravated criminal contempt, criminal contempt in the first degree (two counts) and menacing in the second degree. In August 2010, defendant visited his paramour, Kimmarie Stokes, in an apartment in

ORDER James C. Mahan, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Presently before the court is defendant Maplewood Springs Homeowners’ Association’s (the “HOA”) renewed motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 75). Plaintiff/counter-defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (“Nationstar”) filed a response (ECF No. 84), as did defendant/counterclaimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) (ECF No. 78), to which the HOA replied (ECF Nos.

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr