Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Eat Here Brands LLC”
Johnson v. So Others Might Eat, Inc.public domain
BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge: Petitioner Aaron Johnson seeks review of a Final Order concluding that he was discharged by respondent So Others Might Eat, Inc., (“SOME”) for gross misconduct.1 Because SOME failed to establish any nexus between petitioner’s conduct and his employment with SOME, we conclude that petitioner’s conduct did not amount to gross or simple misconduct. Therefore, we re
Pim Brands Inc v. Haribo of America Incpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 22-2821 _______________ PIM BRANDS INC., Appellant v. HARIBO OF AMERICA INC. _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distri
OPINION TALLMAN, Circuit Judge: Eat Right Foods Ltd. (ERF) appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissal of its claims against Whole Foods Market Services, Inc., and Whole Foods Market Pacific Northwest, Inc. (Whole Foods). ERF, which sold “EatRight”-branded cookies to Whole Foods for many years, argues that its former customer infringed on
792 F.Supp.2d 1242 (2011) ORIGINAL REX, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. BEAUTIFUL BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Rex's Franchise System, LLC, Berry Chic-A-Lo, LLC, Big Rex, LLC, and Coney Beacha, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 10-CV-424-GKF-FHM. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. May 27, 2011. *1243
Opinion dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge REYNA. TARANTO, Circuit Judge. Kraft Foods Global Brands LLC (now called Intercontinental Great Brands) owns U.S. Patent No. 6,918,532, which issued in 2005 and was supplemented with additional claims on reexamination in 2011. The ’532. patent, describes and claims a food package that, after opening, can be resealed to maintain the freshness of the food it
In re Yum! Brands, Inc. Securities Litigationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES R. SIMPSON III, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (DN 82) of Defendants Yum! Brands, Inc. (‘Yum!” or the “Company”), David C. Novak, Richard T. Carucci, and Jing-Shyh S. Su (“Individual Defendants”). Defendants request that the Court dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) (DN 72) with prejudice for fai
Stonefire Grill, Inc. v. FGF Brands, Inc.public domain
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JESUS G. BERNAL, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant FGF Brands, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (“Motion,” Doc. No. 71.) After considering the papers timely filed and the arguments presented at the July 29, 2013 hearing, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural
US Ghost Adventures, LLC v. Miss Lizzie's Coffee LLCpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-2000 US GHOST ADVENTURES, LLC, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. MISS LIZZIE'S COFFEE LLC and JOSEPH PEREIRA, Individually, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Leo T. Sorokin, U.S. Distri
Craft Smith, LLC v. Ec Design, LLCpublic domain
Dee Benson, U.S. District Judge On April 5, 2019 the court heard oral argument on EC Design's Motion for Partial *1392Summary Judgment on First Claim for Copyright Infringement, Craft Smith and Michaels' Motion for Summary Judgment, as well as Craft Smith and Michaels' Motion to Exclude Richard S. Hoffman and EC Design's Motion to Exclude E
Phx. Entm't Partners, LLC v. Kwench, LLCpublic domain
RONNIE L. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC ("Phoenix") brings this action RJ International, Inc. ("RJ International"), a mobile entertainment business, and Kwench LLC ("Kwench"), an eating and drinking establishment, alleging the two defendants are liable under §§ 32 and 43(a) of the Lanham Act,
Cappello v. Restaurant Depot, LLCpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1368 ANTHONY CAPPELLO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. RESTAURANT DEPOT, LLC; D'ARRIGO BROS., CO., Defendants, Appellees, CICCHETTI, LLC, d/b/a IL PANINO ITALIAN DELI; ADAM BROS. FARMING, INC., Defendants. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED S
Phx. Entm't Partners, LLC v. Ryco Enters., LLCpublic domain
RONNIE L. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC ("Phoenix") brings this action against Jason Church d/b/a Music Works Entertainment ("Church"), a mobile entertainment business, and Ryco Enterprises d/b/a Leo's Pub & Grill ("Ryco"), an eating and drinking establishment, alleging the two Defendants are liable under §§ 32 and 43(a) of the Lanham Act,
General Mills, Inc. v. Chobani, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM — DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This is a dispute between plaintiff General Mills, Inc. (“General Mills”) and defendant Chobani, LLC (“Chobani”), direct competitors in the yogurt market, over what constitutes fair play in advertising. General Mills initially filed this action in the United States District Court for the Distric
Phx. Entm't Partners, LLC v. Sports Legends, LLCpublic domain
RONNIE L. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC ("Phoenix") brings this action against three eating and drinking establishments-Sports Legends LLC ("Sports"), doing business as the Blarney Stone Sports Bar & Grill; Kann Inc. ("Kann"), doing business as KT's Smokehouse Saloon; and Borgettis Bar & Grill, Inc. ("Borgettis)-and an individual, Anthony Utz ("Utz"), owner of Mo' Karaoke & DJ Se
Tysons Corner Hotel Plaza LLC v. Fairfax Countypublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Chaney, Frucci and Senior Judge Annunziata Argued by videoconference TYSONS CORNER HOTEL PLAZA LLC OPINION BY v. Record No. 1655-23-4 JUDGE ROSEMARIE ANNUNZIATA
OPINION Sue L. Robinson, Senior District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This consolidated case arises out of the filing of Abbreviated New Drug Applications (“ANDAs”) by defendants Sigmap-harm Laboratories, LLC (“Sigmapharm”); Breckenridge : Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“Breckenridge”); Hikma. Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, PLC, and West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corporation (collectively, “Hi
John Karczewski v. Dch Mission Valley LLCpublic domain
Concurrence by Judge BYBEE, dubitante OPINION GRABER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff John Karczewski, who is paralyzed from the waist down, sought to test-drive one of the cars offered for sale by Defendant DCH Mission Valley LLC. He requested that Defendant temporarily install hand controls so that he could test-drive the car, but Def
Perez v. Super Maid, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN J. THARP, Jr., United States District Judge The Secretary of Labor (the “Secretary”) filed this suit against Super Maid, LLC (“Supermaid”2) and its president and owner, Paul Krawczyk. The Secretary alleges that the defendants violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) minimum wage, overtime, and recordkeeping provisions. The
Ibarrola v. Kind, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER SARA L. ELLIS, United States District Judge Plaintiff Rochelle Ibarrola1 brings this putative class action against Kind, LLC, a maker of food products. Ibarrola purchased one of Kind’s products — Vanilla Blueberry Clusters with Flax Seeds (“Vanilla Blueberry Clusters”) — on two occasions in 2013. Ibarrola brings this suit pursuant to the Illinois C
Grubhub, Inc. v. Relish Labs LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1950 GRUBHUB INC. and TAKEAWAY.COM CENTRAL CORE B.V., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. RELISH LABS LLC and THE KROGER CO., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States D