Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief Judge. Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendations (“R & R”) (Doc. 60) filed on March 19, 2013 by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Also before the Court are Defendant Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company’s (“SFB”) Objections (Doc. 61), Plaintiff V

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Integrand Assurance Company Peticionaria v. Codeco, Cigna Insurance Co., Jonh Doe, Richard Doe, Compañía de Seguros X, Y y Z Recurridos Marcelino Fernández Corp., Newport Cold Storage, Inc., Food Services, Inc., Frozens, Inc., Fronda, Inc. Demandantes-Interventores y Apelantes, ahora Apelada v. Integrand Assurance Co., Codeco (hoy Promoexport) y Cigna Insurance Company

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: American States Insurance Company (“American States”) filed suit seeking a declaration of rights under its policy relating to claims brought against its insureds, painting and repair contractors and a franchisor, by customer Mary Jane Nethery (“Nethery”). The district court granted partial judgment as a matter of law to the insureds, and American S

La Jueza Asociada Señora Fiol Matta emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Se cuestiona en este recurso si la doctrina de la antisu-brogación, que le niega a una aseguradora el derecho a subrogarse contra su propio asegurado, tiene cabida en nuestro ordenamiento jurídico. Si resolvemos en la afirma-tiva, tenemos que precisar los contornos de dicha doctrina y su aplicación a los hechos particulares de este caso. De igu

FAY, Senior Circuit Judge: I. BACKGROUND Gary Studenic became a licensed chiropractor in 1979. He opened his own chiropractic clinic after obtaining his license and by 1984, had opened a second clinic. In 1980 and 1984, Studenic entered into three disability insurance contracts with Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (“Equitable”). The

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 14-1806 BRYANA BIBLE, Individually and on Behalf of the Proposed Class, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STUDENT AID FUNDS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the Un

639 So.2d 1038 (1994) Lemuel B. MAGSIPOC, as personal representative of the Estate of Loraine Magsipoc and Lemuel B. Magsipoc and Estralita Magsipoc, individually, Appellant, v. Ralph LARSEN and Maria Larsen, his wife, Appellees. No. 92-2562. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. July 8, 1994. *1039 Robert M. Molet

130 F.Supp.2d 450 (2001) PRIMAVERA FAMILIENSTIFUNG, Plaintiffs, v. David J. ASKIN, et al., Defendants. ABF Capital Management, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Askin Capital Management, L.P., et al., Defendants. Granite Partners, L.P., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation, et al., Defendants. Montpellier Resources Limited, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Askin Capital Management, L.P., et

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman

This appeal is from a decree in a declaratory judgment proceeding in equity denying complainant-appellant's right to renew its lease for five years. Respondents filed a cross bill and the relief prayed for therein was denied. Respondents have filed cross-assignments of error. The premises leased consisted of commercial space located in the middle of the Eastwood Mall aisle in Birmingham. Appellant's first lease was with Eastwood Corporation in 1960 for five years. Eastwood rene

265 Cal.App.2d 576 (1968) 71 Cal. Rptr. 739 ANGELA RIVERA et al., Petitioners, v. DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL WELFARE et al., Respondents; CALIFORNIA STATE FLORISTS' ASSOCIATION et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. 12023. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. September 10, 1968. *579 Sheldon L

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS