Cases

ORDER HARRY S. MATTICE, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 140). For the reasons stated hereafter, Defendant’s Motion will be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that Defendant is only seeking summary judgment as to the Government’s use of statistical sampl

945 F.Supp. 468 (1996) CHAMPLAIN ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a CommutAir, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America and Beech Aircraft Company, Defendants. No. 94-CV-1356. United States District Court, N.D. New York. November 20, 1996. *469 *470 Kroll & Tract, New York City (William C. Brown, of c

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION The above-captioned matter involves eight remaining defendants1 (collectively, "Defendants") named in a 46-count Second Superseding Indictment (Dkt. 33) ("Indictment") returned on March 16, 2016, alleging various crimes, including a conspiracy in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Org

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge BACKGROUND The above-captioned matter involves 12 remaining defendants1 (collectively, "Defendants") named in a 46-count Second Superseding Indictment (Dkt. 33) ("Indictment") returned on March 16, 2016, alleging various crimes, including a conspiracy in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge *589INTRODUCTION The above-captioned matter involves 12 remaining defendants1 named in a 46-count Second Superseding Indictment (Dkt. 33) ("Indictment") returned on March 16, 2016, alleging various crimes, including a conspiracy in violati

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge BACKGROUND, The above-captioned matter involves 12 remaining defendants1 named in a 46-count Second Superseding Indictment (Dkt. 33) (“Indictment”) returned on March 16, 2016, alleging various crimes, including a conspiracy in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization

KING, Circuit Judge: Appellant German de Jesus Ventura and his co-defendant, Kevin Garcia Fuertes, ran several brothels in Annapolis, Maryland. Eventually, their seedy empire was exposed, resulting in the prosecution of Ventura and Fuertes in the District of Maryland, In a seven-count indictment, Ventura was charged with sex trafficking and related offenses. After a jury found V

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THESE MATTERS are before the Court on the above-named defendants’ motions to dismiss the Indictments in their respective cases for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [CR-15 Docs. 77, 80; CR-16 Docs. 77, 78, 86, 99, 100, and 103].1 Further, the defendants have filed motions to dismiss the Indictments due t

Case: 14-10396 Date Filed: 09/13/2016 Page: 1 of 88 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-10396 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20630-KMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appelle

No. 13-4755 affirmed; No. 13-4931 affirmed in part and vacated and remanded in part by published opinion. Senior Judge DAVIS wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge KEENAN joined. DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge: These appeals arise from the prosecution of two members of an enterprise engaged in interstate prostitution. Following a two-week trial, a ju

Motion In Limine; Expert Disclosures; Fed. R. Evi. 701, 702; RCFC 26(a)(2); Distinction Between Lay and Expert Opinion Testimony. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE WILLIAMS, Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion in limine to preclude Plaintiff from introducing expert testimony

788 F.Supp.2d 847 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Billy WILLIAMS, Sr., Defendant. No. CR 10-4083-2-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. April 7, 2011. *848 Shawn Stephen Wehde, U.S. attorney's Office, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff. Jay Elliott Denne, Munger, Reinschmidt & Denne

786 F.Supp.2d 617 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Damien BANNISTER, Darrell Bannister, Christopher Hall, Cyril McCray, Eric Morris, Roger Patrick, James Ross, Derrick Tatum, Indio Tatum, Jawara Tatum, and Pedro Torres, Defendants. No. 10-CR-0053. United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 8, 2011. *621 Loretta Lynch, U

501 F.3d 59 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David TURNER, Defendant, Appellant. No. 03-2608. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard September 15, 2006. Decided August 31, 2007. *60 *61 *62

266 B.R. 423 (2001) In re COLEMAN ENTERPRISES, INC., and American Cyber Corporation, Inc., Debtors. Nos. 00-33476, 00-33477. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division. September 5, 2001. *424 *425 Robert T. Kugler, Robins, Kaplan Miller & Ciresi, Minneapolis, MN, Robert P. Goe,

(2008) WHOLE ENCHILADA, INC., Plaintiff, v. TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-1533. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. September 29, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintif

501 F.Supp.2d 200 (2007) Richard BOUCHARD, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Civil No. 05-187-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. August 13, 2007. *201 *202 *203 Benjamin R. Gideon, Berman & Simmons, P.A., Lewiston, ME, for Plaintiff.

598 F.3d 257 (2010) TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, fka The Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois; Travelers Casualty & Surety Company, fka The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. HILLERICH & BRADSBY COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 09-5113, 09-5136. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

361 F.Supp.2d 102 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Arthur COFFEY, Harold Daggett, Albert Cernadas and Lawrence Ricci, Defendants. No. 04-CR-651(ILG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 29, 2005. *103 *104 *105

454 F.3d 1300 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David E. MARTINELLI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-13977. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. July 10, 2006. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Edward T.M. Garland, Donald F. Samuel, Garland, Samuel & Loeb, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Defe