Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
3 opinions for “Earskine v. United States”
United States v. Sloanpublic domain
SULLIVAN, Chief Judge (concurring): I join the principal opinion today in its decision not to overturn that portion of United States v. Allen, 33 M.J. 209 (CMA 1991), concerning the reduction in grade and pay of court-martialed retired members. However, I am not adverse to revisiting this issue in a Navy case. As for appellant, I think that, as a matter of constitutional law and codal intent, he is ent
Van Sickle v. Hallmark & Associates, Inc.public domain
SANDSTROM, Justice. [¶ 1] Earl and Harold Van Sickle (“Van Sickles”) appeal and Hallmark & Associ *96 ates, Inc., Frank Celeste, William R. Austin, Phoenix Energy, Bobby Lankford, and Earskine Williams (“Interest Holders”), and Missouri Breaks, LLC, cross-appeal from an amended judgment holding M
Van Sickle v. Hallmark & Associates, Inc.public domain
2008 ND 12 Earl R. Van Sickle and Harold R. Van Sickle, Plaintiffs and Appellants v. Hallmark & Associates, Inc., Frank Celeste, William R. Austin, Phoenix Energy, Bobby Lankford and Earskine Williams, collectively known as "Interest Holders" NEWCO, and their successors in interest, Missouri Breaks, LLC, Defendants and Appellees. No. 20070154 Supreme Court of North Dakota.