Cases

MEMORANDUM * James Earl Wynn (Wynn) appeals his conviction and sentence for aiding and abetting in the filing of false tax returns. Because Wynn failed to object in the district court, our review is for plain error. See United States v. Santiago, 466 F.3d 801, 803 (9th Cir.2006). 1. The district court’s statements regarding the need to reach a verdict did not coerce the jury. T

KERR, District Judge. Appellant is presently confined in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary, McAlester, Oklahoma, serving a sentence of twenty years imposed by the District Court of Muskogee County, Oklahoma. He appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma which denied the writ of habe

DAVID T. LEWIS, Circuit Judge. This case reaches us as an offshoot of events following our decision in Wynn v. Page, 10 Cir., 369 F.2d 930, and directly as an appeal from an order of the District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma denying appellant’s application to enforce an order of that court by extraordinary writ directe

MEMORANDUM & ORDER DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction...............................................................132 II. History of Zyprexa Litigation................................................132 III. Facts...............................................................

RILEY, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE [1] Appellant-Plaintiff, Liter’s of Indiana, Inc. (Liter’s), appeals the trial court’s judgment entered pursuant to a jury’s verdict in favor of the Appellees-Defendants, Earl Bennett (Bennett) and Daniel Bodine (Bodine) (collectively, the Appellees). [2] We affirm, and remand with

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 314PA21 Filed 15 December 2023 PAUL STEVEN WYNN v. REX FREDERICK, in his official capacity as a magistrate, and GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 278 N.C. App. 596, 863 S.E.2d 790 (2021), affirming an order entered on 15 January 2020 by Judge Joh

595 S.E.2d 190 (2004) Mohamed Saleh ZUBAIDI and Abdo A. Hafeed, Plaintiffs, v. EARL L. PICKETT ENTERPRISES, INC. and Earl L. Pickett, Defendants. No. COA03-685. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 4, 2004. *192 Wardell & Associates, PLLC, by Bryan E. Wardell, Raleigh, for plaintiffs-appellees. Loflin & Loflin,

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge. The Beau Rivage Homeowners Association (“plaintiff’) appeals the order of the trial court denying its Motion to Amend Complaint and Add Additional Parties and granting the motion to dismiss of Billy Earl, L.L.C., and Carolina Green Estates, L.L.C., (“defendants”). For the reasons addressed herein, we affirm the order of the trial court. The pertinent facts to the instant appeal are

[1] Earl Wynn, #71080, files herein his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner is presently confined in the state penitentiary at McAlester, where he is serving a sentence of twenty years assessed by the district court of Muskogee County on a conviction of robbery with firearms. [2] The records before the Court indicate that this petitioner heretofore filed a petition for release by habeas corpus, wherein he failed to state any facts which would entitle him to be releas

401 P.2d 534 (1965) Earl WYNN, Petitioner, v. Ray H. PAGE, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, and the State of Oklahoma, Respondents. No. A-13629. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. April 21, 1965. Earl Wynn, pro se. Charles Nesbitt, Atty. Gen., Hugh H. Collum, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents. *535 BUSSEY, P

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 12-1-00034-9, Thomas J. Wynne, J., entered March 27, 2013. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Verellen, A.C.J., concurred in by Appelwick and Schindler, JJ.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7305 Doc: 52 Filed: 06/14/2024 Pg: 1 of 37 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-7305 EARL D. JOHNSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LT. RICHARD ROBINETTE; CHAD ZIMMERMAN, Officer,

Conley Byrd, Justice. In Byler v. State, 257 Ark. 15, 513 S.W. 801 (1974), we quoted liberally from the American Bar Association’s “Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty” and in doing so we stated: “. . . we must observe that compliance with the Standards will go far toward achieving the twofold purpose of (1) assuring justice both to the accused and the public and

/«7?-/V ORIGINAL No. PD-1679-14 UUUKI Ul- UKIMflNHL HI-TtftLb IN THE MAR 02 2015 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS Abel Acosta, Clerk

LINN, Circuit Judge. Earl E. Thompson, Sr. (“Thompson”) appeals the judgment,' pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b), of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (1)- holding, on the counterclaims of defendants Henry T. Haynes,Fluid Controls, Inc., and Mighty Clean Corporation (collectively “Fluid Controls”), that Thompson’s sale of his swivel devices c

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 12, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-175 Lower Tribunal No. F17-23762 ________________ Earl Brannon, Appellant,

386 A.2d 695 (1978) Joseph A. WYNN, II, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 11226. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued March 16, 1978. Decided May 12, 1978. *696 Gaillard T. Hunt, Washington, D. C., appointed by this court, for appellant. Michael L. Lehr, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4257 Doc: 97 Filed: 08/14/2026 Pg: 1 of 30 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4257 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EARL LEROY GRIFFIN, JR., Defendant -

RICH, Judge: These two appeals have been consolidated for hearing and decision on the Government’s motion. Appellants Westover and Roberts were each convicted, after a jury trial, of conspiracy to smuggle and import merchandise 1 illegally, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and smuggling and illegal importation of merc

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christopher Earl Cottrell petitions for a ■writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed ruling on his in forma pauperis application and his petition filed under 28 U.S.C, § 2254 (2012). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Because our review of the district court’s docket