⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Earl M. Moore”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012-08-03 · Published · cited 0× · 474 F. App'x 980
No. 11-5073: Dismissed, and No. 11-5190: Dismissed in part, affirmed in part, by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In Case No. 11-5073, Moya Vantion Moore seeks to appeal his 235-month sentence. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal as barred by Moore’s waiver of the right to appeal included in the p
In Re Benjamin M.public domain
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009-10-30 · Published · cited 23× · 310 S.W.3d 844; 2009 Tenn. App. LEXIS 737; 2009 WL 3518165
310 S.W.3d 844 (2009) In re BENJAMIN M. No. E2009-00209-COA-R3-JV Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Section, at Knoxville. September 15, 2009 Session. October 30, 2009. Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court March 15, 2010. Robert W. Rogers, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jessica M. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorne
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022-03-02 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Josie M. Bostick, Appellant, v. Earl A. Bostick, Sr., Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2019-000157 Appeal From Beaufort County Michèle Patrão Forsythe, Family Court Judge Opinion No. 5898 Heard December 8, 2021 – Filed March 9, 2022 AFFIRMED IN
State v. Moorepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2007-08-03 · Published · cited 20× · 240 S.W.3d 324; 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 6153; 2007 WL 2214545
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 326 OPINION A jury found appellee Billy Moore guilty of driving while intoxicated, for which the court imposed a 100-day term of incarceration. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04 (West 2003). The trial court later granted Moore
State v. Moore/Coenpublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 2010-12-16 · Published · cited 38× · 245 P.3d 101; 349 Or. 371; 2010 Ore. LEXIS 902
245 P.3d 101 (2010) 349 Or. 371 STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review, v. Douglas Carl MOORE, aka Dc Moore, aka Douglas Earl Moore, Respondent on Review. State of Oregon, Petitioner on Review/Respondent on Review, v. Edwin Shane Coen, Respondent on Review/Petitioner on Review. (CC CF050356; CA A134343; SC S057820); (CC 020774FE; CA A135115; SC S058145; S058152). Supr
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-08-19 · Published · cited 33× · 834 F.3d 1168; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15226; 129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 808; 2016 WL 4409291
JORDAN, Circuit Judge: Dr. Ronald E. Moore, Jr. appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims for race discrimination and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Exercising plenary review, see Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc. v. Beech Street Corp., 208 F.3d 1308, 1310 (11th Cir. 2000), and with the benefit of oral argument, we affir
Williams v. Moorepublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012-09-05 · Published · cited 0× · 400 S.C. 90; 733 S.E.2d 224; 2012 WL 3828179; 2012 S.C. App. LEXIS 265
LOCKEMY, J. In this property dispute, Elgie and Larry Moore appeal the trial court’s decision to grant relief to Barbara B. Danley Williams, Sylvia H. Durant Cotton, Janie Durant Ancrum, Tricia Durant Middleton, and Carolyn Durant White (collectively known as Respondents). Specifically, the Moores argue the trial court erred in: (1) basing its decision on the incorrect survey; (2) denying the Moores’ motion for directed verd
M.B. v. E.B.public domain
Delaware Family Court · 2011-07-19 · Published · cited 3× · 28 A.3d 495
OPINION1 HENRIKSEN, J. By way of a certain amount of initial history, the Court entered a Marital Property Division Order on June 01, 2010. Pursuant to that Order, the Court ordered “Husband to pay Wife” the sum of $43,578.25 within 150 days of the mailing date of the Order.2 The Order was mailed June 04, 2010. It appears from undisputed calculations of
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005-09-16 · Published · cited 3× · 275 Ga. App. 526; 621 S.E.2d 535
Phipps, Judge. The parental rights of J. M. T.’s mother and putative father were terminated by the juvenile court.1 The putative father’s relatives contend that the court erred by denying their motion to intervene for purposes of seeking custody of J. M. T. We agree, and therefore reverse the denial of their motion, vacate that portion of the termination order placing custody of the child in the Bu
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014-01-10 · Published · cited 12× · 436 S.W.3d 775; 2014 WL 107976; 2014 Tenn. App. LEXIS 8
OPINION DAVID R. FARMER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ALAN E. HIGHERS, P.J., W.S., and HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., joined. Plaintiffs, eight Shelby County registered voters, filed an action for declaratory judgment challenging the constitutionality of the 2012 Senate Reapportionment Act on the
Watson v. Moorepublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000-01-14 · Published · cited 0× · 8 S.W.3d 909; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 66; 2000 WL 21077
CROW, Presiding Judge. This is a dispute about a 16-foot-wide strip of land. The case reached this court by appeal in 1998, but this court dismissed the appeal because the judgment lacked finality. *911Watson v. Moore, 983 S.W.2d 208 (Mo. App. S.D.1999). Thereafter, the trial court entered judgment disposing of all issue
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2024-07-30 · Published · cited 0×
DEBRA A. CLOUD * NO. 2023-CA-0435 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL EARL M. GIBSON, JR. AND * CHASE MORTGAGE FOURTH CIRCUIT COMPANY-WEST * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIVIL D
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001-06-21 · Published · cited 2× · 150 F. Supp. 2d 1308; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8337; 2001 WL 709114
150 F.Supp.2d 1308 (2001) Andrew P. MOORE II, Plaintiff, v. Harvey E. SCHLESINGER, John E. Steele, Timothy J. Corrigan, Reginald Luster, Charles Truncale, Ralph J. Lee, Maxie Broome, Jr., Earl Johnson, Jr., William J. Henderson, and Egan, Lev & Siwica, Defendants. No. 3:01-cv-108-Orl-31KRS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. June 21, 2001.
Watson v. Moorepublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999-01-08 · Published · cited 4× · 983 S.W.2d 208; 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 18; 1999 WL 5121
983 S.W.2d 208 (1999) Anna M. WATSON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jeffrey L. MOORE and Earl Cole, Defendants-Appellants. No. 22179. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. January 8, 1999. *209 Jacob Y. Garrett, Garrett & Silvey, West Plains, for appellants. John N. Wiles, West Plains, for respondent.<
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2003-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued April 17, 2003 In The Court of Appeals For The
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2023-06-07 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 21-P-916 Appeals Court COMMONWEALTH
Texas Supreme Court · 2011-08-26 · Published · cited 64× · 347 S.W.3d 289; 54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1740; 32 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1344; 2011 Tex. LEXIS 603; 191 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2961; 2011 WL 3796599
347 S.W.3d 289 (2011) TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY-KINGSVILLE, Petitioner, v. Melody YARBROUGH, Respondent. No. 09-0999. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued January 4, 2011. Decided August 26, 2011. Greg W. Abbott, Attorney General of Texas, Clarence Andrew Weber, Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP, David S. Morales, Office of the Attorney General of Texas, Depu
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2006-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 23, 2006 Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 23, 2006. In The
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021-12-22 · Published · cited 3× · 21 F.4th 895
Case: 21-40720 Document: 00516141991 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/22/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED Decem
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2024-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Josie M. Bostick, Respondent, v. Earl A. Bostick Sr., Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2022-000894 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Beaufort County Michèle Patrão Forsythe, Family Court Judge Opinion No. 28226 Heard May 21,