Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Earl Francis Morris”
Earl Raymond Campos v. Joana Campospublic domain
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA EARL RAYMOND CAMPOS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-5857 JOANA CAMPOS, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed October
United States v. Wakinyan McArthurpublic domain
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Anthony Cree, William Morris, and Wakinyan McArthur of criminal offenses stemming from their involvement with the Native Mob, a Minnesota prison and street gang. All three appeal and argue that the district court erred as to the sufficiency of the evidence, jury instructions, or sentencing. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand
United States v. Wakinyan McArthurpublic domain
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Anthony Cree, William Morris, and Wakinyan McArthur of criminal offenses stemming from their involvement with the Native Mob, a.Minnesota prison and street gang. All three appeal and argue that the district court erred as to the sufficiency of the evidence, jury instructions, or sentencing. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand fo
Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp. v. Earl's Tire Service, Inc. (In Re Earl's Tire Service, Inc.)public domain
6 B.R. 1019 (1980) In re EARL'S TIRE SERVICE, INC., a/k/a Earle's Tire Service, Inc., Debtor. DUNLOP TIRE AND RUBBER CORPORATION, a corporation of the State of Delaware, Plaintiff, v. EARL'S TIRE SERVICE, INC., a/k/a Earle's Tire Service, Inc., a corporation of the State of Delaware, and Pirelli Sales Atlantic, Inc., Defendants, and John I. Ellis, Trustee, Counterclaimant. Civ. A. No. 80-154.
Mood v. Kronos Products, Inc.public domain
245 S.W.3d 8 (2007) Paul MOOD, Individually and D/B/A K & M Distributors, Appellant, v. KRONOS PRODUCTS, INC., Appellee. No. 05-06-00111-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. November 28, 2007. *10 Mark L. Nastri, LaDawn Conway, Munsch, Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C., Holly M. Church, Dallas, for appellant. Thomas M. Mic
Morris v. Carter Global Lee, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Timothy C. Morris (“Morris” or “Plaintiff’) brings this action pro se against Defendant Carter Global Lee, Inc. (“CGL” or “Defendant”) 1 , asserting a variety of claims arising out
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00422-CV Patrick Earl Conely, Appellant v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice et al., Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-07-001319, HONORABLE GUS J. STRAUSS, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDU
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00422-CV Patrick Earl Conely, Appellant v.
Alfred Earl Toles v. United Statespublic domain
EAST, District Judge. INDICTMENT AND JUDGMENT OF CONVICTIONS In December, 1960, Alfred Earl Toles, John Preston Goldsmith, Herbert Lee Tate, Charles Shelton Bruce and John Henry Rainey were jointly indicted and charged in Count I with conspiracy 1 t
Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-04-381-CV JAMES R. DUNNAGAN AND APPELLANTS PARKER COUNTY’S SQUAW AND APPELLEES <
</
Farris Genner Morris, Jr. v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 6, 2006 Session FARRIS GENNER MORRIS, JR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C01-50 John Franklin Murchison, Judge No. W2005-00426-CCA-R3-PD - Filed October 10, 2006 Capital Petitioner, Farris Genner Morris, Jr., appeals as of right the judgm
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
Morris Associates, Inc. v. Priddypublic domain
383 S.E.2d 770 (1989) MORRIS ASSOCIATES, INC., et al. v. Max E. PRIDDY. No. 18690. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. August 2, 1989. Warren A. Thornhill, III, Beckley, for Morris Associates. Clyde A. Smith, Jr., Lynch, Mann, Smith & Bibb, Beckley, for Max E. Priddy. MILLER, Justice: This is an appeal by the plaintiffs below, Morris
Andrews v. Morrispublic domain
607 P.2d 816 (1980) William ANDREWS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Lawrence MORRIS, Warden of the Utah State Prison, Defendant and Respondent. No. 16168. Supreme Court of Utah. February 13, 1980. *818 John T. Caine, Richard W. Giauque of Berman & Giauque, Salt Lake City, Timothy K. Ford, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff and appell
Lee v. Boothepublic domain
235 S.W.3d 448 (2007) Tammie Kay LEE, Appellant v. William A. BOOTHE, M.D., d/b/a Boothe Eye Care and Laser Center, Appellee. No. 05-06-00776-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. October 3, 2007. *449 Mark M. Donheiser, Mathis & Donheiser, P.C., Dallas, for Appellant. Heather R Johnson, John A. Scully, Diana L. Faust
In re Pet Food Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM. Donald Earl, pro se, appeals from the District Court’s order denying his motion *859to intervene and his Rule 60(b) motion to vacate. For the reasons that follow, we shall affirm the District Court’s order. This case relates to a civil class action products liability lawsuit filed in the District of New Jersey
In re Pet Food Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM. Donald Earl, pro se, appeals from the District Court’s order denying his motion *859to intervene and his Rule 60(b) motion to vacate. For the reasons that follow, we shall affirm the District Court’s order. This case relates to a civil class action products liability lawsuit filed in the District of New Jersey
Francis v. Statepublic domain
OPINION OLIVER, Judge. Represented by retained counsel below and here, Francis has duly perfected an appeal in the nature of a writ of error to this Court challenging the validity of his second degree murder conviction and 10-to-15-year penitentiary sentence adjudged by the Criminal Court of Bradley County where he was tried upon an indictment charging him with the first degree murder of Kenneth L. Wright.