Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD v. Nichia Corporation”
Everlight Electronics Co. v. Nichia Corp.public domain
Opinion and Order Granting Judgment in Favor of Nichia on Everlight’s INEQUITABLE CONDUCT CLAIMS GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, United States District Judge I. Introduction Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Ever-light”), commenced this suit seeking a declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of Nichia Corporation’s (“Nichia”), United States Patent No. 5,998,925 (the “’
Everlight Electronics Co. v. Nichia Corp.public domain
*868 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING NICHIA CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS EVERLIGHT’S CLAIMS FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF UNENFORCEABILITY OF NICHIA’S PATENTS L#24] GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff, Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Everlight”), filed the instant action seeking a declara
Nichia Corp. v. Everlight Elecs. Co.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Nichia Corporation v. Everlight Americas, Inc.public domain
STOLL, Circuit Judge. Nichia Corporation sued Everlight Electronics Co., LTD., Everlight Americas, INC., and Zenaro Lighting, Inc. (collectively, “Everlight”) for infringement of three of its patents. Following a bench trial, the district court found Everlight infringed all three patents and' had not proved them invalid. The court denied, however, Nichia’s request for a perman
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Saris, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION The defendants, Everlight and Epistar, have asserted the affirmative defense of laches, alleging that they should not be liable for any pre-suit damages because the plaintiff, Trustees of Boston University (BU), unreasonably delayed in filing suit against them, and this delay, caused the defendants material economic prejudice. BU re
ACCEPTED 15-25-00001-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/13/2025 10:46 PM Case No. 15-25-00001-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________________________
Skedco, Inc. v. Strategic Operations, Inc.public domain
HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff Skedco, Inc. brings this action against Defendant Strategic Operations, Inc., alleging that Defendant infringes Claims 18, 19, and 20 of United States Patent No. 8,342,652 ("the '852 Patent") which discloses a system for simulating hemorrhages in the training of first responders.1 The United States, through the Secretary of the Army, owns the '852 Patent. Plaintiff is
TD Bank NA v. Vernon Hill, IIpublic domain
KRAUSE, Circuit Judge. This case marks the latest chapter in the bitter feud between Commerce Bank, which has since merged with TD Bank, and its former CEO, Vernon W. Hill, II. See generally Hill v. TD Bank, NA , 586 F. App'x 874 (3d Cir. 2014) ;
ACCEPTED 15-25-00001-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/23/2025 2:53 PM No. 15-25-00001-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE