Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “ESCOBAR MOLINA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOSÉ ESCOBAR MOLINA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-3417 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs B.S.R., N.S., and R.S.M. are former and current D.C. residents with pending asylum applications. See ECF N
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOSÉ ESCOBAR MOLINA, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Civil Action No. 25-3417 (BAH) Plaintiffs, Judge Beryl A. Howell v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al.,
Escobar v. Mukaseypublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Erick Alfonso Escobar, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for subs
Quijada Escobar v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Edwin Elias Quijada Escobar, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings held in absentia. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 7
Kattra v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Boutros Albert Kattra (“Kattra”), a native and citizen of Lebanon, asks us to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review denials of motions to reopen under an abuse of discretion standard. Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002
Kattra v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Boutros Albert Kattra (“Kattra”), a native and citizen of Lebanon, asks us to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review denials of motions to reopen under an abuse of discretion standard. Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002
Anibowei v. Morganpublic domain
Case: 20-10059 Document: 00516791350 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June 19, 2023
Loredo Rangel v. Garlandpublic domain
Case: 23-60089 Document: 81-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/01/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED May 1, 2024 No. 23-60089
Chmukh v. Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VITALIY CHMUKH, No. 21-1096 Agency No. Petitioner, A079-176-419 v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argu
United States v. Ortiz-Rodriguezpublic domain
Case: 24-50213 Document: 82-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/23/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit _____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-50213 consolidated with FILED
Alicia Naranjo Garcia v. Robert Wilkinsonpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALICIA NARANJO GARCIA, No. 19-72803 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A215-670-558 ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of a
Corpeno-Romero v. Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CANDELARIA DE LOS ANGELES No. 23-576 CORPENO-ROMERO; JAVI Agency Nos. ALEXANDER CORNEJO- A215-944-680 CORPENO, A215-944-681 Petitioners, OPINION v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Resp
Winston Gutierrez-Alm v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WINSTON IVAN GUTIERREZ- No. 17-71012 ALM, Agency No. Petitioner, A070-031-172 v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Khanal v. Bondipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 14-1572 NIRANJAN KHANAL; GITA KHANAL, Petitioners, v. PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,* Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before Montecalvo and Kayatta,**
Reyna Alfaro-Zelaya v. Pamela Bondipublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2069 Doc: 57 Filed: 10/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 31 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2069 REYNA ELISA ALFARO-ZELAYA; E.J.A.Z., Petitioners, v. PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petitio
Ronald Streck v. Eli Lilly and Companypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 23-2134, 23-2216, 23-2958, 23-3035, 24-1352, & 24-1884 UNITED STATES, et al., ex. rel., RONALD J. STRECK, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. _____________
Ronald Streck v. Eli Lilly and Companypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 23-2134, 23-2216, 23-2958, 23-3035, 24-1352, & 24-1884 UNITED STATES, et al., ex. rel., RONALD J. STRECK, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. _____________
Ronald J. Streck v. Eli Lilly and Companypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 23-2134, 23-2216, 23-2958, 23-3035, 24-1352, & 24-1884 UNITED STATES, et al., ex. rel., RONALD J. STRECK, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. _____________
Ronald Streck v. Eli Lilly and Companypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 23-2134, 23-2216, 23-2958, 23-3035, 24-1352, & 24-1884 UNITED STATES, et al., ex. rel., RONALD J. STRECK, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. _____________
Ronald J. Streck v. Eli Lilly and Companypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 23-2134, 23-2216, 23-2958, 23-3035, 24-1352, & 24-1884 UNITED STATES, et al., ex. rel., RONALD J. STRECK, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. _____________