Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “ERNEST C. LAMIRAND”
United States v. Lamirandpublic domain
669 F.3d 1091 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keenan Anthony LAMIRAND, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-6033. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. January 5, 2012. Chris Eulberg of Eulberg Law Offices, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant-Appellant. Jonathon E. Boatman, Assistant United States Attorney (Sanford C. Coats, United States
United States v. Lefflerpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 19, 2019 Elisabeth A. Shumaker
United States v. Wrightpublic domain
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Bruce Carlton Wright of conspiracy to commit bank fraud and of eleven counts of bank fraud arising from his participation in a scheme to submit false draw requests and invoices to obtain bank loans. The district court sentenced Wright to thirty-three months’ imprisonment and ordered him to pay $1,094,490.60 in restitution. Wright raises
United States v. Llantadapublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit March 8, 2016 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNIT
United States v. Murphypublic domain
O'BRIEN, Circuit Judge. *1187 Aaron Wilkie Murphy is a convicted drug dealer and admitted addict. He used his home for drug-related activity. The only issue is whether that use of his home was enough to warrant an enhancement to his sentence under USSG § 2D1.1(b)(12), which increases guid
United States v. McBridepublic domain
Appellate Case: 22-4119 Document: 010111009992 Date Filed: 03/05/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 5, 2024 FO
United States v. Deiterpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 24, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker
United States v. MacKaypublic domain
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. The bedrock principle that “no person shall be made to suffer the onus of a criminal conviction except upon ... evidence necessary to convince a trier of fact beyond a reasonable doubt of the existence of every element of the offense” is well-settled in our criminal jurisprudence. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 316, 99 S.Ct. 2781,
United States v. Deiterpublic domain
O'BRIEN, Circuit Judge. This case raises a run-of-the-mill ineffective assistance of counsel claim. It also presents an interesting Johnson II claim-whether aiding and abetting ( 18 U.S.C. § 2 ) federal bank robbery ( <
Whyte Monkee Productions v. Netflixpublic domain
Appellate Case: 22-6086 Document: 010111022699 Date Filed: 03/27/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 27, 2024
Abernathy v. Wandespublic domain
HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Gary Abernathy, a federal prisoner, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, which dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. By way of § 2241, Mr. Abernathy seeks to have an alleged error of law in the calculation of his sentence corrected based upon a subsequently iss
United States v. Rodebaughpublic domain
*1287 PER CURIAM. In this appeal, the court affirms on all issues. This disposition is addressed in two opinions: one by Judge Matheson and one by Judge Bacharach. Parts I and II(A)-(D) of Judge Matheson’s opinion represent the unanimous opinion of the court. There, the court a
United States v. De Vaughnpublic domain
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. Defendant Jay Stuart De Vaughn mailed twelve hoax anthrax letters to the President of the United States, seven members of Congress, and two Argentine consulates in the United States. He pleaded guilty to multiple counts of mailing threatening *1143 communications in violat
Rodriguez v. Statepublic domain
DAVIS, Chief Justice. [¶1] A jury convicted Rogelio Rodriguez, Jr. of delivery of a controlled substance. On appeal, he claims his right to due process was violated when the district court admitted into evidence a witness identification that was based on a single photo, rather than a photo array. We conclude that because Mr. Rodriguez did not file a pretrial motion to suppress evidence of the identification, as required by W.R.Cr.P.
Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. This appeal was brought by the Court Clerk for Tulsa County, Oklahoma, asking us to overturn a decision by the district court declaring unenforceable the Oklahoma state constitutional prohibition on issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. It followed quickly on the heels of an analogous appeal brought by State of Utah officials requesting similar relief. Recognizing that the ruling in the Utah c
Whyte Monkee Productions v. Netflixpublic domain
Appellate Case: 22-6086 Document: 213-1 Date Filed: 04/30/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 30, 2026
Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 18, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of