Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER, et al. : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 06-1942 (GK) : DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al. : : Defendant. : ______________________________:

741 F.Supp.2d 273 (2010) EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER, et al., Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-1942 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 5, 2010. *276 Eugene I. Goldman, Johnny H. Walker, III, Joshua David Rogaczewski McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Elizabeth Elaine G

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 17-cv-1272 (KBJ) ) UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case N0. 06cvl991 (RJL) ) POST PROPERTIES, INC. and POST GP ) HOLDINGS, INC. and POST ) APARTMENTS HOMES, L.P., ) ) FILED Defendants, ) JUL 2 8 20" 'l"'*" C|erk, U.S. Distn'ct & Bankruptcy MEM()RANDUM ORDER Cuurfs for the District of CO|umbla (July jjzoi 1) On June 16, 2010, while on appeal, the Equal Rights Center ("ERC") moved the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

PER CURIAM: Appellant Equal Rights Center (ERC), a non-profit advocacy organization, filed a complaint against appellees Ernest Banks and Properties International, alleging a violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (DCHRA), D.C.Code §§ 2-1401.01 to 2-1404.04 (2012 Repl.). The trial court dismissed the complaint, concluding that appellant lacked standing to bring the

657 F.Supp.2d 197 (2009) EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER, Plaintiff, v. POST PROPERTIES, INC. and Post GP Holdings, Inc. and Post Apartments Homes, L.P., Defendants, and United States of America, Movant. Civil Case No. 06cv1991 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 28, 2009. Douglas W. Baruch, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 06cv1991 (RJL) ) POST PROPERTIES, INC. and POST GP ) HOLDINGS, INC. and POST ) AP

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ALAN KAY, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery [69], Defendants’ Opposition [70] and Plaintiffs Reply [71], I. Background On November 21, 2006, Plaintiff Equal Rights Center (“ERC”) filed a Complaint alleging that Defendants (coll

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ALAN KAY, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Compel Discovery [59], Plaintiffs Opposition [61], and Defendants’ Reply [62]. Defendants request that the Court order Plaintiff to (1) provide more complete answers in response to Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories, (2) produce additional documents in re

522 F.Supp.2d 1 (2007) EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER, Plaintiff, v. POST PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06cv1991 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 25, 2007. *2 *3 Isabelle M. Thabault, Donald Lee Kahl, Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights & Ur

573 F.Supp.2d 205 (2008) EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-00498 (HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 2, 2008. *207 Thomas W. Brunner, Andrew Stephen Krulwich, Brendan J. Morrissey, Brian H. Pandya, Ch

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. As has been noted by Fifth Circuit Judge Robert M. Parker in United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203, 272 (2001) (“The fact that the 84 pages of dicta contained in [the majority opinion] are interesting, scholarly, and well written does not change the fact that they are dicta and amount to at best an advisory treatise on this long-running debate.”) (Par

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-CV-0669 TAMU TURNER, APPELLANT, V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF HUM

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 21-TX-0473 & 21-TX-0627 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, APPELLANT, V. DESIGN CENTER OWNER (D

(Slip Opinion) Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment Congress has constitutional authority to impose a deadline for ratifying a proposed constitutional amendment. It exercised this authority when proposing the Equal Rights Amendment and, because three-fourths of the state legislatures did not ratify before the deadline that Congress imposed, the Equal Rights Amendment has failed of adop- tion and is no longer pending before the States. Accordingly, even if one or more s

(Slip Opinion) Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment Congress has constitutional authority to impose a deadline for ratifying a proposed constitutional amendment. It exercised this authority when proposing the Equal Rights Amendment and, because three-fourths of the state legislatures did not ratify before the deadline that Congress imposed, the Equal Rights Amendment has failed of adop- tion and is no longer pending before the States. Accordingly, even if one or more s

798 F.Supp.2d 707 (2011) EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER v. EQUITY RESIDENTIAL, et al. Civil Action No. CCB-06-1060. United States District Court, D. Maryland. July 22, 2011. *711 Isabelle Marie Thabault, Robert Mark Bruskin, Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, Joseph M. Sellers, Matthew Keith Handley, Peter Romer-Friedman, Cohen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA L.N., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 24-cv-109-TSC-MJS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This case requires the Court to determine whether the District of Columbia Public Schools (“DCPS” or the “District”) met its statutory ob

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALAN E. FISCHER III, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 24-cv-00044 (CRC) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Alan E. (“AJ”) Fischer III was indicted on seven criminal charges—including several vio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MALAIKA LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 22-3369 (RDM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case involves two separate encounters that Plaintiff Malaika Lewis and her minor daughter, Pl