Cases

*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 27-MAY-2020 09:02 AM IN THE SUPREME

*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 27-MAY-2020 12:27 PM IN THE

J-A14033-17 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. STEWART ENOS, Appellee No. 1131 EDA 2016 Appeal from the Order March 22, 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-46-CR-0008798-2014 BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.

[Cite as State v. Enos, 2015-Ohio-5466.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2015-P-0029 - vs - : GARY W. ENOS, JR.,

380 S.C. 295 (2008) 669 S.E.2d 619 April D. ENOS, Appellant, v. John DOE and Travelers Indemnity Insurance Co., Defendants, of whom: John Doe is the, Respondent. No. 4444. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard October 8, 2008. Decided October 14, 2008. Rehearing Denied December 19, 2008.

OPINION Justice FLAHERTY, for the Court. This case came before the Supreme Court on May 10, 2011, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda of the parties, we are satisfied that cause has not been shown. Accordingly, we shall dec

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Eric Holder and Robert Mueller, III (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #32) Plaintiffs’ Richard Enos (“Enos”), Jeff Bastasini (“Bastasini”), Louie Mercado (“Mercado”), Walter Groves (“Groves”), Manuel Monteiro (“Monteiro”), Edward Erickson (“Erickson”),

187 Cal.App.4th 1242 (2010) DAVID CRITZER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. JERRY ENOS et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. H033913. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. August 30, 2010. *1245 Greene, Chauvel, Descalso & Minoletti, A.K. Abraham and Kenneth M. Weinfield for Plaintiffs and Appellants. L

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 922 OPINION April Chapman (Chapman) appeals from a judgment upon a special verdict finding in favor of defendants Bruce Enos (Enos) and the County of Sonoma (County) on her causes of action for sexual harassment and retaliation. The pivotal issue for liability was whether the alleged harasser, E

OPINION Wells, Judge: The petition in the instant case was filed in response to a Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330 (notice of determination).1 In the notice of determination, respondent determined that collection should proceed against petitioners to collect a liability for accrued interest on p

Flannery, J. On December 1, 1995, Margaret Enos, a woman of some ninety years, was living in her home in St. Petersburg, Florida, with her dog Molly. Nearby were her sister Ellie, in a nursing home, and her niece Maiy Lambert. *361In July, 1994, in a guardianship proceeding, the Probate Division of the Pinellas County, Florida, Circuit Court had determined Enos to

DECISION Plaintiffs Gary and Jane Enos ask this Court to declare that two contiguous lots of land that they own are exempt from the merger provisions of the Town of Richmond Zoning Ordinance. Plaintiffs further ask this Court to issue a writ of mandamus to order the Town to correct its records to reflect this exemption. Defendants Kathy Damicis, in her capacity as Treasurer of the Town of Richmond, and Elizabeth J. Fou

909 S.W.2d 293 (1995) Dennis Wayne ENOS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-92-100-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. October 19, 1995. *294 Alan K. Butcher, John C. Beatty, and Tom Hill, Hill, Beatty, Butcher & Gallagher, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Tim Curry, Criminal District Attorney; Betty Marsh

Gillerman, J. The plaintiffs are fourteen taxpayers domiciled in Plymouth who own property in the vicinity of the Eel River. They have brought a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that a certificate of compliance issued by the Secretary of Environmental Affairs (Secretary) to the town of Plymouth *240regarding the proposed construction of a sewage treatment plant is

73 S.W.3d 784 (2002) Richard R. ENOS and Loraine A. Enos, Appellants, v. RYDER AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS, INC., f/k/a Delavan, Respondent. No. ED 79167. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. March 19, 2002. Rehearing Denied April 25, 2002. *787 Brian M. Wendler, Collinsville, IL, Roger K. Ezra, C

903 P.2d 1273 (1995) 79 Hawai`i 452 John H. ENOS, Jr. and Aileen H. Enos, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PACIFIC TRANSFER & WAREHOUSE, INC., a Hawai`i corporation, and Maynard Koa, Defendants-Appellees, and John Does 1-10, and Doe Entities 1-10, Defendants, and Leslie S. Fukumoto, Party in Interest-Appellant. No. 18438. Supreme Court of Hawai`i. September

910 P.2d 116 (1996) 80 Hawai`i 345 John H. ENOS, Jr. and Aileen H. Enos, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PACIFIC TRANSFER & WAREHOUSE, INC., a Hawai`i corporation, and Maynard Koa, Defendants-Appellees, and John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, and Doe Entities 1-10, Defendants, and Leslie S. Fukumoto, Party in Interest-Appellant. No. 18128. Supreme Court of Hawai`i.

206 B.R. 89 (1996) In re METROPOLITAN METALS, INC., Debtor. Joseph F. and Caroline ENOS, Plaintiffs, v. Charles J. DeHART, III Trustee in Bankruptcy for Metropolitan Metals, Inc., Defendant, and UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 79-318, Adversary No. 5-95-0331A. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. April 24, 1996.

616 F.Supp. 32 (1984) Eric M. ENOS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John O. MARSH, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 82-0571. United States District Court, D. Hawaii. January 5, 1984. *33 *34 *35 Alan T. Murakami, John Harris Paer, Boyce R. Brown, Jr., Honolulu, Hawaii,

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 27 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 28 OPINION Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of second degree burglary. (Pen. Code, §