⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “EMILY LOUISE BELL”

Bell v. 3M Co.public domain
District Court, D. Colorado · 2018-09-25 · Published · cited 7× · 344 F. Supp. 3d 1207
R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge Defendants Tyco Fire Products, Chemguard and 3M move to dismiss plaintiffs' medical monitoring claims, arguing that Colorado's appellate courts have not recognized such a cause of action. Tyco and Chemguard alternatively request that the issue be certified to the Colorado Supreme Court. Several other defendants ask to join one or both of the motions to dismiss. I decline to certify the
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998-10-23 · Published · cited 1× · 159 F.3d 422; 14 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 849; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 26958; 1998 WL 736372
ORDER We certify the following question to the Supreme Court of California all as set forth in the attached request: Once an employer’s unilaterally adopted policy — which requires employees to be retained so long as a specified condition does not occur — has become a part of the employment contract, may the employer thereafter unilaterally rescind the policy, even though the specified condition has not occur
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 1 F. App'x 683
MEMORANDUM1 On October 23, 1998, we filed a Memorandum affirming the district court’s grant of summary judgment against the plaintiffs/appellees on their claims of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and discrimination in violation of ERISA. We held in abeyance the defendants/appellants’ cross-appeal of summary judgment in favor of eight plaintiffs on their breach of contract claim, and as to that issue, cert
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-08-15 · Published · cited 15× · 202 F. Supp. 3d 376; 120 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1117; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111803; 2016 WL 4399289
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Louise Rams and Alexander Flemming filed this action on April 13, 2015 in the Central District of California against Defendants Def Jam Recordings, Inc. (“Def Jam”), Universal Music Group Recordings, Inc. (“UMG”), Jeremih Fel-ton, Mick Schultz Productions, and Does 1-10 Inclusive (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintif
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991-03-05 · Published · cited 46× · 927 F.2d 259; 19 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 64; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 3464; 1991 WL 25996
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge. In this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, Allen Friedman appeals the summary dismissal of his claims for malicious prosecution, false arrest, and false imprisonment. Friedman’s malicious prosecution claim is that the district court erred in finding the United States had probable cause to prosecute him for violations of the
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998-10-23 · Published · cited 2× · 159 F.3d 422
159 F.3d 422 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7952, 98 Daily JournalD.A.R. 11,047Craig ASMUS, William J. Vasquez; Pacific Telesis GroupManagement Force Allocation Plan, and/or the Pacific TelesisGroup Surplus Management Severance Plan aka MFAP; PhylyssApel; Gloria Alas; Eldridge Aubrey; James Banks; AreleenCastille; Barbara Clark; John Gary Eidell Jr.; MargaretEmerick; Juanita Evans; Jeffrey E. Fulton; Camille Galyk;<
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-07-26 · Published · cited 0× · 198 F. Supp. 3d 881; 2016 WL 3997598; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96964
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge Citibank, N.A. has sued the Municipal Employee’s Officer’s and Official’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago (the Fund), prank Galvin, and James Galvin. The Court has jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. In 2012, the Fund directed Northern Trust Bank to debit the Citibank account of William Galvin, a deceased pensioner, for a lit
Farley v. Hollerpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007-08-07 · Published · cited 9× · 647 S.E.2d 675; 185 N.C. App. 130; 2007 N.C. App. LEXIS 1732
647 S.E.2d 675 (2007) Monique R. FARLEY, John N. Meehan, Marcia J. Meehan, Patrick S. O'Hara, Emily C. O'Hara, Alexis G. Blanchard, William J. Lee, Millie L. Lee, Monty R. Willis, Luz M. Willis, and George D. Phillips, Plaintiffs, v. Larry HOLLER, Sharon Y. Holler, Robert E. Lee, Jr., Jane D. Lee, Theron Levon McLamb, Larry C. Lewis, Becky Lewis, Victor A. Armstrong, June J. Armstrong, Charles E. Rumbley, Patricia D. Rumbley, Curtis Northrop Stra
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2019-08-20 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIAR EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PEREZ, ANTHONY WILLIAMS, ANNIE J. BUTLER, ANTHO
Washington Supreme Court · 2018-08-02 · Published · cited 12× · 422 P.3d 891
WIGGINS, J. ¶ 1 These four consolidated cases present the same question: May Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) condemn the city of Seattle's electrical transmission line easements located in the city of Bellevue to extend Sound Transit's regional light rail system? For the following reasons, we affirm the trial courts in part and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We hold that
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015-01-29 · Published · cited 76× · 777 F.3d 892
ROVNER, Circuit Judge. For thirteen years Yaroslav SMyarsky worked as a custodian at a Chicago office building. His employer changed several times during that period, and in April 2010 he began working for Harvard Maintenance when that company was awarded the building’s contract for janitorial services. Almost immediately Harvard supervisors began disciplining Sklyarsky. He comp
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2023-05-17 · Published · cited 0×
FILED May 17 2023, 8:39 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017-02-28 · Published · cited 0× · 238 F. Supp. 3d 751; 122 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1040; 2017 WL 782291; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27711
ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, United States District Judge This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss, pursuant to Fed*753eral Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (DE 92, 101). The issues presented are ripe for ruling. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is granted. BACKGROUND On Octob
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007-05-10 · Published · cited 1× · 869 N.E.2d 401; 373 Ill. App. 3d 479
869 N.E.2d 401 (2007) The NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, Trustee of the Caroline E. Haskell Trust, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elizabeth Yates KNOX, Michael Lloyd Yates, Elizabeth Lee Loughran, Deborah Lee Heller, Walter W. Bell, not individually but as Trustee of The Deborah Lee Trust, Cynthia Healy Ellis, Winston Healy Jr., Jonathan L. Healy, Elizabeth Condict Lange, Carolyn G. Lange Clarke, Stacy Lange Columbo, Connie Lee Foster, Gerritt Davis Foster, III
Whitford v. Nicholpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015-12-17 · Published · cited 0× · 151 F. Supp. 3d 918; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168650; 2015 WL 9239016
OPINION and ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge In this civil action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiffs are Wisconsin residents and Democratic voters who are challenging the 2012 districting plan for the Wisconsin Assembly on the ground that the plan is an example of “extreme partisan gerrymandering.” Cpt. ¶2, dkt. #1. Plaintiffs contend that the plan violates the First and Fourteenth Amendment
District Court, N.D. California · 2010-06-08 · Published · cited 3× · 270 F.R.D. 477; 23 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 667; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62704; 2010 WL 2348659
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge. This case is about the implementation of cuts to the wages paid to In-Home Support Services (IHSS) providers, who provide in-home assistance to low-income elderly and disabled individuals through California’s Medi-Cal program. Plaintiffs are a proposed class of tens of thousands of individuals who currently receive a
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014-04-18 · Published · cited 0× · 16 F. Supp. 3d 944; 2014 WL 1577837; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54671
OPINION AND ORDER PHILIP P. SIMON, Chief Judge. The Environmental Protection Agency and three similar state agencies from Indiana, Michigan and Illinois filed a complaint against U.S. Steel Corporation alleging violations of the Clean Air Act relating to plants U.S. Steel operates in those three states. In Count One of its complaint, the EPA sought both damages and an injunction for alleged vio
Whitford v. Gillpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016-11-21 · Published · cited 9× · 218 F. Supp. 3d 837; 101 Fed. R. Serv. 1472; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160811; 2016 WL 6837229
OPINION and ORDER RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. OPINION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Background.. .843 A. Reapportionment in Wisconsin. . .844 B. Drafting of Act 43... 846 C. Prior Court Challenges to Act 43...853 II. Procedural History.. .854 A. Allegations of the Complaint.. .854
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2001-06-14 · Published · cited 20× · 68 S.W.3d 712; 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 3960; 2001 WL 665002
68 S.W.3d 712 (2001) Teresa GONZALEZ and Richard Gonzalez, Individually and as Surviving Parents of Emily Gonzalez, Deceased, Appellants, v. EL PASO HOSPITAL DISTRICT, Operating as R.E. Thomason General Hospital, Texas Tech University, Operating as Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Dr. Mariann Louise Zakarian, Dr. Tamara Kincaid, Dr. Robert W. Vera, Dr. J. Garcia (Believed to be Dr. Jerry Garcia), and Nurses Lorena Sanchez, R.N., R.N.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2019-08-20 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued August 20, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIAR EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PERE